To Be or Not to Be …Human? Theorizing the Role of Human-Like Competencies in Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agents

References

• Affectiva. Affectiva Automotive AI For Occupant Experience Monitoring. 2020. https://www.affectiva.com/product/affectiva-automotive-ai-for-occupant-monitoring/ (accessed on 20 October 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R.; and Karahanna, E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 4 (2000), 665–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, M.K.; and Thatcher, J.B. Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 29, 3 (2005), 427–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R. Why Artificial Intelligence Is Different From Previous Technology Waves. 2017. https://medium.com/machine-learning-in-practice/why-artificial-intelligence-is-different-from-previous-technology-waves-764d7710df8b#:~:text=The%20key%20that%20makes%20AI,is%20its%20strong%20research%20background.&text=When%20it%20comes%20to%20AI,body%20that%20approves%20new%20advances (accessed on 15 September 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J.D.; and Krueger, A.B. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 4 (2001), 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, T. Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 8 (2018), 183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Beane, M. Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 1 (2019), 87–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbya, H.; Pachidi, S.; and Jarvenpaa, S. Special issue editorial: Artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 2 (2021), 281–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstein, B. This Is Why AI Has Yet To Reshape Most Businesses. 2019. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612897/this-is-why-ai-has-yet-to-reshape-most-businesses/ (accessed on 1 September 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H.R. Interviewing: Unstructured and semistructured. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Oxford, England: AltaMira Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A.; and Premkumar, G. Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28, 2 (2004), 229–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A.; Davis, C.J.; Connolly, A.J.; and Hikmet, N. User response to mandatory IT use: A coping theory perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 27, 4 (2018), 395–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biocca, F.; Harms, C.; and Burgoon, J.K. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12, 5 (2003), 456–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G.E.; Mizrahi, M.; Hoffman, G.; Reis, H.T.; Finkel, E.J.; and Sass, O. What robots can teach us about intimacy: The reassuring effects of robot responsiveness to human disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 10 (2016), 416–423.
   Google Scholar
• Blasco-Arcas, L.; Hernandez-Ortega, B.; and Jimenez-Martinez, J. Adopting television as a new channel for e-commerce. The influence of interactive technologies on consumer behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 4 (2013), 457–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, S. Chatbots On Websites: How Effective Are They? 2019. https://obj.ca/article/chatbots-websites-how-effective-are-they (accessed on 16 May 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R.E. The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.; Fuller, R.; and Thatcher, S.M. Impression formation and durability in mediated communication. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 9 (2016), 614–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J.K.; Bonito, J.A.; Bengtsson, B.; Ramirez Jr, A.; Dunbar, N.E.; and Miczo, N. Testing the interactivity model: Communication processes, partner assessments, and the quality of collaborative work. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 3 (1999), 33–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones, A.; and Gallivan, M.J. Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 657–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones, A.; Stein, M.-K., and Mishra, A. IS Use. 2017. http://misq.org/research-curations (accessed on 15 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, S.; Srivastava, S.C.; and Theng, Y.L. Cognitive absorption and trust for workplace collaboration in virtual worlds: An information processing decision making perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 10 (2012), 797–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, P.; Selvarajah, S.; and Webster, J. Engagement in multimedia training systems. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers: IEEE, 1999, pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cheatham, B.; Javanmardian, K., and Samandari, H. Confronting the Risks of Artificial Intelligence. 2019. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/confronting-the-risks-of-artificial-intelligence# (accessed on 16 May 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Cognizant. The Chatbot Imperative: Intelligence, Personalization And Utilitarian Design 2017. https://www.cognizant.com/whitepapers/the-chatbot-imperative-intelligence-personalization-and-utilitarian-design-codex2469.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Columbus, L. What’s New In Gartner’s Hype Cycle For AI, 2020. 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2020/10/04/whats-new-in-gartners-hype-cycle-for-ai-2020/?sh=5c8b467a335c (accessed on 2 June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, F.G.; Schober, M.F.; Jans, M.; Orlowski, R.A.; Nielsen, D.; and Levenstein, R. Comprehension and engagement in survey interviews with virtual agents. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, October (2015), 1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davenport, T.H.; and Ronanki, R. Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96, 1 (2018), 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (1989), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreede, T.; Nguyen, C.; De Vreede, G.-J.; Boughzala, I.; Oh, O.; and Reiter-Palmon, R. A theoretical model of user engagement in crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Collaboration and Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, pp. 94–109.
   Google Scholar
• DeRosa, D.M.; Hantula, D.A.; Kock, N.; and D’Arcy, J. Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in Alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 43, 2‐3 (2004), 219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S.; and Kohli, R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49, 3 (2003), 273–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devraj, S.; Easley, R.F.; and Crant, J.M. How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information Systems Research, 19, 1 (2008), 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, L.; Kim, C.; and Orey, M. Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 12 (2017), 126–142.
   Google Scholar
• Donthu, N.; and Gustafsson, A. Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, September (2020), 284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Y.; Edwards, J.S.; and Dwivedi, Y.K. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, October (2019), 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Emmerling, R.; Boyatzis, R.E.; and Emmerling, R.J. Emotional and social intelligence competencies: Cross cultural implications. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19, 1 (2012), 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, G.E.; Hess, T.M.; and Smith, B.T. The impact of age and motivation on cognitive effort: Implications for cognitive engagement in older adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 28, 2 (2013), 495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esau, N.; Kleinjohann, L.; and Kleinjohann, B. Integrating emotional competence into man-machine collaboration. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Biologically Inspired Collaborative Computing. Boston, MA: Springer, 2008, pp. 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Eschenbrenner, B.; and Nah, F.F.-H. Information systems user competency: A conceptual foundation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, 1 (2014), 1363–1378.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, B.; and Wang, L. Interactivity, engagement, and technology dependence: understanding users’ technology utilisation behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36, 2 (2017), 113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountaine, T.; McCarthy, B.; and Saleh, T. Building the AI-powered organization. Harvard Business Review, 97, 4 (2019), 62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschi, K.; Lee, R.M.; Zanakis, S.H.; and Hinds, D. Engaging group e-learning in virtual worlds. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1 (2009), 73–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B.L.; and Losada, M.F. Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 7 (2005), 678–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D.; and Straub, D. Managing user trust in B2C e-services. E-Service Journal, 2, 2 (2003), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gil Press. AI Stats News: 86% Of Consumers Prefer Humans To Chatbots. 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2019/10/02/ai-stats-news-86-of-consumers-prefer-to-interact-with-a-human-agent-rather-than-a-chatbot/?sh=218e36172d3b (accessed on 30 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Goldmoney Insights. Artificial Intelligence, Or Can Machines Think? 2018. https://www.goldmoney.com/research/goldmoney-insights/artificial-intelligence-or-can-machines-think (accessed on 14 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Gong, L. How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 4 (2008), 1494–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; and Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; and Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 4 (2009), 408–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, G.; Konradt, U.; and Voss, K. Competencies for virtual teamwork: Development and validation of a web-based selection tool for members of distributed teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 4 (2006), 477–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, C.; and Bergner, A. AI-driven sales automation: Using chatbots to boost sales. NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 11, 2 (2019), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J.; Ford, W.R.; and Farreras, I.G. Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 8 (2015), 245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C.-C.; and MacDorman, K.F. Measuring the uncanny valley effect. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9, 1 (2017), 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L.D. Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus. Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 7–8 (2011), 785–807.
   Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L.D.; Glynn, M.S.; and Brodie, R.J. Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 2 (2014), 149–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, W.; Chan, F.K.; Thong, J.Y.; Chasalow, L.C.; and Dhillon, G. A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 25, 1 (2014), 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management, 45, 7 (2008), 499–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L.R.; Choi, C.C.; Ko, C.-H.E.; McNeil, P.K.; Minton, M.K.; Wright, M.A.; and Kim, K.-i. Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 1 (2008), 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. Reflections on the 2016 decade award: Incorporating context in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 42, 4 (2017), 577–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. AI-Based ‘Synthetic Personas’ Can Augment And Transform Audience Research. 2019. https://www.warc.com/newsandopinion/opinion/ai-based-synthetic-personas-can-augment-and-transform-audience-research/3130 (accessed on 6 October 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A.; and Haenlein, M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62, 1 (2019), 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.S. The integrative framework of technology use: An extension and test. MIS Quarterly, 33, 3 (2009), 513–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T.Y.; Cable, D.M.; Kim, S.P.; and Wang, J. Emotional competence and work performance: The mediating effect of proactivity and the moderating effect of job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30, 7 (2009), 983–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.H.; Kim, D.J.; and Wachter, K. A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems, 56, December (2013), 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. The ape that used email: Understanding e-communication behavior through evolution theory. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 5, January (2001), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N. The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science, 15, 3 (2004), 327–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward e-communication tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 2 (2005), 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. Information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psychology: An interdisciplinary review and theory integration framework. MIS Quarterly, 33, 2 (2009), 395–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankton, N.K.; McKnight, D.H.; and Tripp, J. Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 10 (2015), 880–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-T. Exploring high-performers’ required competencies. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1 (2010), 434–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M.K.; and Whitney, D.J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1 (2001), 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D.P.; Lockwood, C.M.; and Williams, J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 1 (2004), 99–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahidhar, V.; and Davenport, T. Why companies that wait to adopt AI may never catch up. Harvard Business Review, 6(2018), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• McCafee, R.P.; Sengupta, A., and Wray, J. This Much-Hyped Technology Is Failing Businesses. Here’s Why. 2020. https://www.fastcompany.com/90449015/this-much-hyped-technology-is-failing-businesses-heres-why#:~:text=When%20it%20comes%20to%20making,shown%20more%20promise%20than%20performance.&text=Most%20organizations%20reported%20failures%20among,to%20a%2050%25%20failure%20rate (accessed on 16 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D.H.; Choudhury, V.; and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 3 (2002), 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcknight, D.H.; Carter, M.; Thatcher, J.B.; and Clay, P.F. Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2, 2 (2011), 12–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mileounis, A.; Cuijpers, R.H.; and Barakova, E.I. Creating robots with personality: The effect of personality on social intelligence. In Proceedings of the International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation. Cham: Springer, 2015, pp. 119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A.M.; and Liu, L.F. Trust in Digital Humans. In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Wellington, New Zealand, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, K.; Boynton, L.; and Mishra, A. Driving employee engagement: The expanded role of internal communications. International Journal of Business Communication, 51, 2 (2014), 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Mollen, A.; and Wilson, H. Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63, 9–10 (2010), 919–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltzau, A. Artificial Intelligence and Trust. 2019. https://becominghuman.ai/artificial-intelligence-and-trust-e2bc1ac548 (accessed on 2 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Mori, M.; MacDorman, K.F.; and Kageki, N. The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19, 2 (2012), 98–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, A.L.; and Maner, J.K. The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 135, 2 (2008), 151–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, K.L.; and Rauh, C. The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1 (2005), 153–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H.L.; and Toms, E.G. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 6 (2008), 938–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H.L.; and Toms, E.G. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1 (2010), 50–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva, T. Will AI Replace Humans In The Customer Service Industry? 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/valleyvoices/2017/08/10/will-ai-replace-humans-in-the-customer-service-industry/#1b6ef73993c4 (accessed on 14 May 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Pardes, A. The Emotional Chatbots Are Here To Probe Our Feelings. 2018. https://www.wired.com/story/replika-open-source/ (accessed on 15 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Petouhoff, N. What Is A Chatbot And How Is It Changing Customer Experience? 2019. https://www.salesforce.com/blog/2019/04/what-is-a-chatbot.html (accessed on 30 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Petter, S.; Straub, D.; and Rai, A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 623–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittenger, L.M. Emotional and social competencies and perceptions of the interpersonal environment of an organization as related to the engagement of IT professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 623 (2015), 1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M.; and Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 4 (1986), 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porra, J.; Lacity, M.; and Parks, M.S. Can computer based human-likeness endanger humanness?”–A philosophical and ethical perspective on digital assistants expressing feelings they can’t have. Information Systems Frontiers, 22, 3 (2019), 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K.J.; and Hayes, A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 4 (2004), 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K.J.; and Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 40, 3 (2008), 879–891.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, C.; Weaven, S.; and Wong, I.A. Linking AI quality performance and customer engagement: The moderating effect of AI preference. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90(2020), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, M.; Zealley, J.; and Maseli, O. The risks of using AI to interpret human emotions. Harvard Business Review, 18(2019), 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.F. The affect of vision and compassion upon role factors in physician leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 442 (2015), 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reese, R.J.; Gillaspy Jr, J.A.; Owen, J.J.; Flora, K.L.; Cunningham, L.C.; Archie, D.; and Marsden, T. The influence of demand characteristics and social desirability on clients’ ratings of the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 7 (2013), 696–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikke, F.D., and Teo, Y.S. Personas. 2020. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/personas-why-and-how-you-should-use-them (accessed on 1 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.; and Wendt, J. Technologies that assist in online group work: A comparison of synchronous and asynchronous computer mediated communication technologies on students’ learning and community. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 24, 3 (2015), 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W.B.; Salanova, M.; González-Romá, V.; and Bakker, A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 1 (2002), 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, S.; and Venkatesh, V. The rise of human machines: How cognitive computing systems challenge assumptions of user-system interaction. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21, 2 (2020), 460–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetzler, R.M.; Giboney, J.S.; Grimes, G.M.; and Nunamaker Jr, J.F. The influence of conversational agent embodiment and conversational relevance on socially desirable responding. Decision Support Systems, 114, October (2018), 94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetzler, R.M.; Grimes, G.M.; and Giboney, J.S. The effect of conversational agent skill on user behavior during deception. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 8 (2019), 250–259.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetzler, R.M.; Grimes, G.M.; and Scott Giboney, J. The impact of chatbot conversational skill on engagement and perceived humanness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 3 (2020), 875–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeger, A.-M.; Pfeiffer, J.; and Heinzl, A. Texting with human-like conversational agents: Designing for anthropomorphism. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 4 (2021), 931–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seering, J.; Luria, M.; Kaufman, G.; and Hammer, J. Beyond dyadic interactions: Considering chatbots as community members. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK, 2019, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, Z.; McNamara, R.; Wootton, S.; Leung, R.; Spencer, L.; Dale, M.; Dennis, S.; and McKeough, Z. People attending pulmonary rehabilitation demonstrate a substantial engagement with technology and willingness to use telerehabilitation: A survey. Journal of Physiotherapy, 63, 3 (2017), 175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, M.; Riemer, K.; and Kay, J. Actors, avatars and agents: Potentials and implications of natural face technology for the creation of realistic visual presence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 10 (2018), 953–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. Can Artificial Intelligence “Think”? 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielshapiro1/2019/10/23/can-artificial-intelligence-think/#6e182ea12d7c (accessed on 26 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Sharek, D.; and Wiebe, E. Measuring video game engagement through the cognitive and affective dimensions. Simulation & Gaming, 45, 4–5 (2014), 569–592.
   Google Scholar
• Shirish, A.; Srivastava, S.C.; and Chandra, S. Impact of mobile connectivity and freedom on fake news propensity during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country empirical examination. European Journal of Information Systems, 30, 3 (2021), 322–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P.E.; and Bolger, N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 4 (2002), 422–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singapore Airlines. Singapore Airlines Launches Chatbot For Customer Queries. 2017. https://www.singaporeair.com/en_UK/tw/media-centre/press-release/article/?q=en_UK/2017/October-December/ne2417-171212 (accessed on 15 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Skjuve, M.; Haugstveit, I.M.; Følstad, A.; and Brandtzaeg, P.B. Help! Is my chatbot falling into the uncanny valley? An empirical study of user experience in human-chatbot interaction. Human Technology, 15, 1 (2019), 30–54.
   Google Scholar
• Spackman, M.P. Can machines adequately simulate human emotion? A test of four theories of emotion. Theory & Psychology, 14, 6 (2004), 755–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S.C.; Chandra, S.; and Shirish, A. Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Information Systems Journal, 25, 4 (2015), 355–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S.C.; Teo, T.S.; and Devaraj, S. You can’t bribe a computer: Dealing with the societal challenge of corruption through ICT. MIS Quarterly, 40, 2 (2016), 511–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S.C.; and Chandra, S. Social presence in virtual world collaboration: An uncertainty reduction perspective using a mixed methods approach. MIS Quarterly, 42, 3 (2018), 779–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M.-K.; Newell, S.; Wagner, E.L.; and Galliers, R.D. Coping with Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 39, 2 (2015), 367–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarnalatha, C.; and Prasanna, T. Employee engagement: The concept. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 3, 12 (2013), 3872–3880.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T.S.H.; Srivastava, S.C.; and Jiang, L. Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 3 (2008), 99–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J.B.; McKnight, D.H.; Baker, E.W.; Arsal, R.E.; and Roberts, N.H. The role of trust in postadoption IT exploration: An empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58, 1 (2010), 56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trantopoulos, K.; von Krogh, G.; Wallin, M.W.; and Woerter, M. External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. MIS Quarterly, 41, 1 (2017), 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turing, A. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 236 (1950), 433–460.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 4 (2004), 695–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, A.; Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C.; and Straub, D.W. Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (2008), 73–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.; and Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1 (2012), 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; and Bala, H. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1 (2013), 21–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; and Sullivan, Y.W. Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 7 (2016), 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; and Benbasat, I. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6, 3 (2005), 72–101.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.; and Haggerty, N. Individual virtual competence and its influence on work outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (2011), 299–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J.; and Ahuja, J.S. Enhancing the design of web navigation systems: The influence of user disorientation on engagement and performance. MIS Quarterly, 30, 3 (2006), 661–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieseke, J.; Geigenmüller, A.; and Kraus, F. On the role of empathy in customer-employee interactions. Journal of Service Research, 15, 3 (2012), 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, H.J.; and Daugherty, P.R. Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review, 96, 4 (2018), 114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. Empathy In Artificial Intelligence. 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/12/17/empathy-in-artificial-intelligence/#4024e69d6327 (accessed on 29 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Z.; Chen, P.-J.; and Lew, A.A. From high-touch to high-tech: COVID-19 drives robotics adoption. Tourism Geographies, 22, 3 (2020), 724–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T.; Agarwal, R.; and Lucas Jr, H.C. The value of IT-enabled retailer learning: personalized product recommendations and customer store loyalty in electronic markets. MIS Quarterly, 35, 4 (2011), 859–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Paul, S.; Demirkan, H.; Yuan, L.; Spohrer, J.; Zhou, M.; and Basu, J. Intelligence augmentation: Towards building human-machine symbiotic relationship. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 2 (2021), 243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M.X.; Mark, G.; Li, J.; and Yang, H. Trusting virtual agents: The effect of personality. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 9, 2–3 (2019), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar