647
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How Do Shared IT Applications Influence Agility? Theory and Evidence of a Convex Relationship

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bagozzi, R.P.; and Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1 (1988), 74–94.
  • Barnett, M.L.; and Salomon, R.M. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 11 (2006), 1101–1122.
  • Benbya, H.; Nan, N.; Tanriverdi, H.; and Yoo, Y. Complexity and information systems research in the emerging digital world. MIS Quarterly, 44, 1 (2020), 1–17.
  • Boh, W.F., and Yellin, D. Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 3 (2007), 163–207.
  • Bridoux, F.; and Stoelhorst, J. Stakeholder governance: Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 47, 2 (2020), 214–236.
  • Bstieler, L. The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on new product development and time efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 3 (2005), 267–284.
  • Chakravarty, A.; Grewal, R.; and Sambamurthy, V. Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24, 4 (2013), 976–997.
  • Chang, J.C.-J.; and King, W.R. Measuring the performance of information systems: A functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 1 (2005), 85–115.
  • Chau, D.C.; Ngai, E.W.; Gerow, J.E.; and Thatcher, J.B. The effects of business-IT strategic alignment and IT governance on firm performance: A moderated polynomial regression analysis. MIS Quarterly, 44, 4 (2020), 1679-1703.
  • Chen, M.; Kaul, A.; and Wu, B. Adaptation across multiple landscapes: Relatedness, complexity, and the long run effects of coordination in diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 40, 11 (2019), 1791-1821.
  • Chirico, F.; Criaco, G.; Baù, M.; Naldi, L.; Gomez-Mejia, L.R.; and Kotlar, J. To patent or not to patent: That is the question. Intellectual property protection in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44, 2 (2020), 339–367.
  • Cram, W.A.; Brohman, K.; and Gallupe, R.B. Information systems control: A review and framework for emerging information systems processes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 4 (2016), 216–266.
  • Dutt, N.; and Joseph, J. Regulatory uncertainty, corporate structure, and strategic agendas: Evidence from the US renewable electricity industry. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 3 (2019), 800–827.
  • Felipe, C.M.; Leidner, D.E.; Roldán, J.L.; and Leal‐Rodríguez, A.L. Impact of IS capabilities on firm performance: The roles of organizational agility and industry technology intensity. Decision Sciences, 51, 3 (2020), 575–619.
  • Fornell, C.; and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
  • Gaba, V.; and Joseph, J. Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in m-form firms. Organization Science, 24, 4 (2013), 1102–1119.
  • Haans, R.F.; Pieters, C.; and He, Z.L. Thinking about u: Theorizing and testing u‐and inverted u‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 7 (2016), 1177–1195.
  • Hair, J.; Black, W.; Babin, B.; and Anderson, R. Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
  • Hirst, G.; Van Knippenberg, D.; Zhou, Q.; Zhu, C.J.; and Tsai, P.C.-F. Exploitation and exploration climates’ influence on performance and creativity: Diminishing returns as function of self-efficacy. Journal of Management, 44, 3 (2018), 870–891.
  • Hoffmann, C.P.; Lutz, C.; and Meckel, M. Digital natives or digital immigrants? The impact of user characteristics on online trust. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 3 (2014), 138–171.
  • Hsu, C.; Lee, J.-N.; Fang, Y.; Straub, D.W.; Su, N.; and Ryu, H.-S. The role of vendor legitimacy in IT outsourcing performance: Theory and evidence. Information Systems Research, 33, 1 (2022), 337–361.
  • Jaccard, J.; and Turrisi, R. Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003.
  • Jorgensen, B.; Li, J.; and Sadka, G. Earnings dispersion and aggregate stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 1 (2012), 1–20.
  • Kappelman, L.; Torres, R.; McLean, E.R.; Maurer, C.; Johnson, V.L.; Snyder, M.; and Guerra, K. The 2021 SIM IT issues and trends study. MIS Quarterly Executive, 21, 1 ( 2022), 75–114.
  • Kim, G.; Shin, B.; Kim, K.K.; and Lee, H.G. IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 7 (2011), 487–517.
  • Klein, P.G.; Mahoney, J.T.; McGahan, A.M.; and Pitelis, C.N. Organizational governance adaptation: Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. Academy of Management Review, 44, 1 (2019), 6–27.
  • Kreutzer, M.; Walter, J.; and Cardinal, L.B. Organizational control as antidote to politics in the pursuit of strategic initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 9 (2015), 1317–1337.
  • Lawson, J. In the digital economy, your software is your competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, (2021). https://hbr.org/2021/01/in-the-digital-economy-your-software-is-your-competitive-advantage. Accessed July 2022.
  • Lee, O.-K.; Sambamurthy, V.; Lim, K.H.; and .Wei, K.K. How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Information Systems Research, 26, 2 (2015), 398–417.
  • Liang, H.; Wang, N.; and Xue, Y. Juggling information technology (IT) exploration and exploitation: A proportional balance view of IT ambidexterity. Information Systems Research, Ahead of print. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1105 (2022), 1–17.
  • Liang, H.; Wang, N.; Xue, Y.; and Ge, S. Unraveling the alignment paradox: How does business—IT alignment shape organizational agility? Information Systems Research, 28, 4 (2017), 863–879.
  • Lind, J.T.; and Mehlum, H. With or without u? The appropriate test for a u‐shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72, 1 (2010), 109–118.
  • Lindgren, R.; Mathiassen, L.; and Schultze, U. The dialectics of technology standardization. MIS Quarterly, 45, 3 (2021), 1187–1212.
  • Lu, Y.; and Ramamurthy, K. Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35, 4 (2011), 931–954.
  • Mitchell, R. Globalized IT operations pay off. Computerworld Magazine (2012), URL: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2505820/globalized-it-operations-pay-off.html. (Accessed July 2022).
  • Nazir, S.; and Pinsonneault, A. Relating agility and electronic integration: The role of knowledge and process coordination mechanisms. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30, 2 (2021), 1–22.
  • Nunnally, J.C.; and Bernstein, I.H. The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 1 (1994), 248–292.
  • Oh, W.; and Pinsonneault, A. On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly, 31, 2 (2007), 239–265.
  • Olson, E.; Slater, S.; and Hult, G. The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69, (2005), 49–65.
  • Park, Y.; El Sawy, O.A.; and Fiss, P. The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: A configurational approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18, 9 (2017), 648–686.
  • Parmigiani, A.; and Holloway, S.S. Actions speak louder than modes: Antecedents and implications of parent implementation capabilities on business unit performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 5 (2011), 457–485.
  • Pfeffer, J.; and Sutton, R.I. The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press, 2000.
  • Powell, T.C.; and Dent-Micallef, A. Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 5 (1997), 375–405.
  • Queiroz, M.; Tallon, P.P.; Coltman, T.; and Sharma, R. Conditional paths to business unit agility: Corporate IT platforms and the moderating role of business unit IT autonomy. European Journal of Information Systems, Ahead of print. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2039564 (2022), 1–20.
  • Ravichandran, T. Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27, 1 (2018), 22–42.
  • Ritala, P. Coopetition strategy–when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23, 3 (2012), 307–324.
  • Roberts, N.; and Grover, V. Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm’s customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 4 (2012), 231–270.
  • Ross, J.W.; and Beath, C.M. Agility and risk management at pacific life: Optimizing business unit autonomy. MIT CISR Working Paper WP 372, (2007), 1–13.
  • Sakhartov, A.V.; and Folta, T.B. Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 12 (2014), 1781-1797.
  • Sambamurthy, V.; Bharadwaj, A.; and Grover, V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27, 2 (2003), 237–263.
  • Schilke, O. On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 2 (2014), 179–203.
  • Schoenherr, T.; and Mabert, V.A. An exploratory study of procurement strategies for multi‐item rfqs in b2b markets: Antecedents and impact on performance. Production and Operations Management, 20, 2 (2011), 214–234.
  • Soh, F.; and Grover, V. Leveraging platform boundary resources: The role of distributed sensemaking. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 2 (2022), 366–394.
  • Stivers, C.T. Firm-level return dispersion and the future volatility of aggregate stock market returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 6, 3 (2003), 389–411.
  • Straub, D.; Boudreau, M.C.; and Gefen, D. Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 24 (2004), 380–427.
  • Tallon, P.P.; and Pinsonneault, A. Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35, 2 (June 2011), 463–486.
  • Tallon, P.P.; Queiroz, M.; Coltman, T.; and Sharma, R. Business process and information technology alignment: Construct conceptualization, empirical illustration, and directions for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 9 (2016), 555–580.
  • Tallon, P.P.; Queiroz, M.; Coltman, T.; and Sharma, R. Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28, 2 (2019), 218–237.
  • Tallon, P.P.; Short, J.E.; and Harkins, M.W. The evolution of information governance at intel. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12, 4 (2013), 189–198.
  • Tanriverdi, H. Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29, 2 (2005), 311–334.
  • Tanriverdi, H. Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (2006), 57–77.
  • Teece, D.; Peteraf, M.; and Leih, S. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58, 4 (2016), 13–35.
  • Teece, D.J. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 1, 3 (1980), 223–247.
  • Teece, D.J. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 1 (1982), 39–63.
  • Teece, D.J.; Rumelt, R.; Dosi, G.; and Winter, S. Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23, 1 (1994), 1–30.
  • Terlap, S. How P&G launched a 24-hour disinfecting spray just as covid-19 hit the U.S. Wall Street Journal (2020), URL: https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-p-g-cleaned-house-before-covid-19-11605279627 (Accessed July 2022).
  • Tiwana, A.; and Kim, S.K. Discriminating IT governance. Information Systems Research, 26, 4 (2015), 656–674.
  • Tsai, H.-T.; and Bagozzi, R.P. Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Quarterly, 38, 1 (2014), 143–163.
  • Venkatesh, V.; and Goyal, S. Impact of an enterprise system implementation on job outcomes: Challenging the linearity assumption. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 1 (2022), 6–40.
  • Wallace, D.W.; Johnson, J.L.; and Umesh, U. Multichannels strategy implementation: The role of channel alignment capabilities. Decision Sciences, 40, 4 (2009), 869–900.
  • Wan, W.P.; Hoskisson, R.E.; Short, J.C.; and Yiu, D.W. Resource-based theory and corporate diversification: Accomplishments and opportunities. Journal of Management, 37, 5 (2011), 1335–1368.
  • Weill, P.; and Ross, J.W. IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
  • Weill, P.; and Woerner, S. Succeeding at digital requires more infrastructure. MIT CISR Research Briefing, XVI, 10 (2016), 1–4.
  • Williams, C.K.; and Karahanna, E. Causal explanation in the coordinating process: A critical realist case study of federated IT governance structures. MIS Quarterly, 37, 3 (2013), 933–964.
  • Wooldridge, J.M. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning, 2012.
  • Wu, S.; Straub, D.; and Liang, T.-P. How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Quarterly, 39, 2 (2015), 497–518.
  • Xue, L.; Mithas, S.; and Ray, G. Commitment to IT investment plans: The interplay of real earnings, management, IT decentralization, and corporate governance. MIS Quarterly, 45, 1 (2021), 193–224.
  • Xue, L.; Ray, G.; and Gu, B. Environmental uncertainty and IT infrastructure governance: A curvilinear relationship. Information Systems Research, 22, 2 (2011), 389–399.
  • Xue, Y.; Liang, H.; and Boulton, W.R. Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: The impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context. MIS Quarterly, 32, 1 (2008), 67–96.
  • Zhou, J.; Fang, Y.; and Grover, V. Managing collective enterprise information systems compliance: A social and performance management context perspective. MIS Quarterly, 46, 1 (2022), 71–99.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.