Influence of length of augmented message on children's attitudes toward Peers who use augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Beck, A., & Dennis, M. (1996). Attitudes of children toward a sim-ilar-aged child who uses augmentative communication. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Fritz, H., Keller, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use AAC. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Rennels, K., & Bova, L. (1997, November). Integration of children in special education: A case study. Poster session pre-sented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Convention, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J., Hoag, L., Calculator, S., & Molineux, B. (1992). Vari-ables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative communication system user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1105–1113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disor-ders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1989). Augmentative Communication News, 2(3), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1993). Augmentative Communication News, 6(4), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., Armstrong, R., O'Connor, A., & Freeman, R. (1993). Children's attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication tech-niques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, V. (1994). Children's perceptions of peers who demonstrate phonological, voice, or fluency disorders: Implications for caseload inclusion. Unpublished master's thesis, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Chiba, C. (1984). Children's attitudes toward emotionally disturbed peers. In R. Jones (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in spe-cial education: Theory and practice (pp. 171–183). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behaviors: The MODE model as an integrated framework. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–108). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, C., & Gorenflo, D. (1991). The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34,19–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorenflo, C., Gorenflo, D., & Santer, S. (1994). Effects of syn-thetic voice output on attitudes toward the augmented commu-nicator. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37,64–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorenflo, D., & Gorenflo, C. (1997). Effects of synthetic speech, gender, and perceived similarity on attitudes toward the aug-mented communicator. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, /3,87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, J., Corman, L., & Curci, R. (1984). Attitudes toward men-tally retarded children. In R. Jones (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice (pp. 143–156). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Guralnick, M. (1981). The social behavior of preschool children of different developmental levels: Effects of group composition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, L., & Bedrosian, J. (1992). Effects of speech output type, message length, and reauditorization on perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult AAC user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,1363–1366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson Co. (1993). The Picture Communication Symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. (1993). Trait-behavior relations and dispositional infer-ence. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 586–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., Armstrong, R., & King, S. (1986). Children's atti-tudes toward disabled peers: A self-report measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 517–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. (1981). Developmental differences in reactions to the physically disabled. Human Development, 24, 240–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M., & Wright, J. (1967). Scales for the measurement of atti-tudes. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Siller, J. (1984). Attitudes toward the physically disabled. In R. Jones (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice (pp. 184–205). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., & Graham, S. (1984). An attributional approach to emotional development. In C. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 167–191). Cam-bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windows Boardmaker (Version 1.0.0) [Computer software]. (1994). Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (1993). Supplementing tests of statistical significance: Variation accounted for. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 644–656.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar