Preschoolers with communication impairments play shrinking Kim: An interactive computer storytelling intervention for teaching Blissymbols

References

• AccessBliss [Computer program]. (1990). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Blissymbolics Communication International.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled sub-jects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 11,6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. K. (1965). Semantography: Blissymbolics (3rd ed.). Syd-ney, Australia: Semantography: Blissymbol Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search for understanding: The case for constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Associa-tion for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli, S., & Shen, Y. (1998). Semantic transparency and translucency in compound Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. 0., Heron T. E., & Heward W. L. (1987). Applied behav-ior analysis. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R. (1997). Initial study into the effects of translucency and complexity on the learning of Blissymbols by children and adults with normal cognitive abilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, 0. E. (1995). The effects of active versus passive com-puter instruction on the learning of Blissymbols while using ele-ments for teaching compounds. Unpublished doctoral disserta-tion, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, 0., & Lloyd, L. L. (2000). Shrinking Kim: The effects of active versus passive computer instruction on the learning of element and compound Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 16, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, 0. E., Quist, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1994). A comparison of computer and instructor presentation on the learning of Blis-symbols by students with communication disorders. Paper pre-sented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Lan-guage-Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1992). Using nondisabled persons in AAC research. In A. Newel & J. Light (Eds.), Augmentative commu-nication research: Proceedings from the Second ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication. Philadelphia, PA: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, /1,2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, J., & Lloyd, L. L. (1985). An investigation of the effect of element explanation on the ability of preschool children to learn Blissymbols. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbut, B. A., lwata, B. A., & Green, J. D. (1982). Nonvocal lan-guage acquisition in adolescents with severe physical disabili-ties: Blissymbol versus iconic stimulus formats. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 241–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HyperCard (Version 2.1) [Computer software]. (1991). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Harding, R. (1998). Identification and production of graphic symbols by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of soft-ware application. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 14, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. New York: Longman. McNaughton, S. (1985). Communicating with Blissymbols. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nail-Chiwatalu, B. J. (1991). The influence of symbol and learner factors on the leamability of Blissymbols by students with men-tal retardation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Uni-versity, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J. A., & Hoffman, P. R. (1990). Language intervention within naturalistic environments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Ser-vices in Schools, 21, 72–84.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1976). The psychology of intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Lit-tlefield Adams.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1993). Effects of initial element teaching in a story-telling context on Blissymbol acquisition and generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 979–995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1997). Effects of paired-associ-ate learning versus symbol explanations on Blissymbol com-prehension and production. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, /3,226–239.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, A., & Haaf, R. G. (1995). Comparison of two training methods in the learning and generalization of Blissymbolics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 154–164.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T., & Gagne, R. M. (1976). Retention of related and unre-lated sentences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 843–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. A. (1992). Blissymbol reference guide. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yopp, R. H., & Dreher, M. J. (1994). Effects of active comprehen-sion instruction on attitudes and motivation in reading. Reading Horizons, 34,288–302.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., & Vicker, B. (1994). A historic perspec-tive on augmentative and alternative communication. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.
   Google Scholar