Attitudes of children toward an unfamiliar peer using an AAC device with and without voice output

References

• Aiken, L. R. (1996). Rating scales and checklists: Evaluating behaviour, personality, and attitudes. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Alant, E. (1999). Students with little or no functional speech in schools for students with severe mental retardation in South Africa. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., & Dennis, M. (1996). Attitudes of children toward a similar-aged child who uses augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Fritz, H., Keller, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Calculator, S. N., & Molineux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative commu-nication system user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,1105–1113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alter-native communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., Armstrong, R. W., O'Connor, A., & Freeman, R. (1993). Children's attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication tech-niques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, D. (1995). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, R. S. (1993). Understanding psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, C. R., & Simpson, R. L. (1987). Modifying the attitudes of nonhandicapped high school students toward handicapped peers. Exceptional Children, 53,342–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., Crain, S. S., & Elder, P. S. (1994). Engineering the preschool environment for interactive symbolic communication. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Con-ference Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, C. W., & Gorenflo, D. W. (1991). The effects of informa-tion and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. Journal of Speech and Hear-ing Research, 34, 19–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorenflo, D. W., & Gorenflo, C. W. (1997). Effects of synthetic speech, gender and perceived similarity on attitudes toward the augmented communicator. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 13, 87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology & edu-cation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Helander, E., Mendis, P., Nelson, G., & Goerdt, A. (1989). Train-ing in the community for people with disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Hoag, L. A., Bedrosian J. L., Johnson, D. E., & Molineux, B. (1994). Variables affecting perceptions of social aspects of the com-municative competence of an adult AAC user. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Kisanji, J. (1995). Growing up disabled. In P. Zinkin & H. McConachie (Eds.), Disabled children & developing countries (pp. 183–202). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. W. (1987). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report (2nd ed.). Madi-son, WI: Trace Research and Development Centre, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R., & Arvidson, H. H. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication. A handbook of principles and practices. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. M., & Ursprung, A. W. (1990). Children's attitudes toward people with disabilities: A review of the literature. In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (pp. 158–164). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
   Google Scholar
• NCSCET (National Commission on Special Needs in Education and Training). (1997). Education for all. Cape Town, South Africa: University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, B. M., Brown, L., & Schuller, R. (1998). Identification and rankings of communication aid features by five groups. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A. N. (1973). Questionnaire design and attitude mea-surement. London: Heinmann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A. N. (1994). Questionnaire design, interviewing, and attitude measurement. London: Printa Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. L., Armstrong, R. W., & King, S. M. (1986). Chil-dren's attitudes toward disabled peers: A self-report measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 517–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis, M. M., & Reid, D. H. (1995). Effects of a voice output com-munication aid on interactions between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behav-ior Analysis, 28, 73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voeltz, L. M. (1980). Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 455–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wisely, D. W., & Morgan, S. (1981). Children's ratings of peers pre-sented as mentally retarded and physically handicapped. Amer-ican Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 281–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar