Generalization of skills using pictographic and voice output communication devices

References

• Baumgart, D., Johnson, J., & Helmstetter, E. (1990). Augmenta-tive and alternative communication systems for persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1999). AAC efficacy research: Challenges for the new century. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R. (1999). Scholarly writing: Managing the compe-tition for time and attention. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 15, 212–214.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W. (1989). Augmentative communication services in the schools. Asha, 31, 61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blischak, D. M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1996). Multimodal augmentative and alternative communication: Case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, S. 0., & Dashiell, S. E. (1984). Interaction checklist for augmentative communication INCH: An observation tool to assess interactive behavior (Rev. ed.). Bisbee, AZ: lmaginart Communications Products.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Dollaghan, C. (1982). The use of communication boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 281–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Ill. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Dyches, T. T. (1998). Effects of switch training on the communi-cation of children with autism and severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, J. B., & Campbell, P. H. (1987). Technology for persons with severe disabilities: Practical and ethical considerations. Journal of Special Education, 21, 122–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, C. W., & Gorenflo, D. W. (1991). The effects of informa-tion and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. Journal of Speech and Hear-ing Research, 34, 19–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodson, B. W. (1985). Computer analysis of phonological processes. Taylorville, IL: Phono Comp.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J., Bronicki, G. J. B, & Guess, D. (1987). Opportunities to express preferences and make choices among participants with severe disabilities in classroom settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson, R. (1991). The Picture Communication Symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, L. K., Brady, N. C., McLean, J. E., & Behrens, G. A. (1999). Communication forms and functions of children and adults with severe mental retardation in community and institu-tional settings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & Angelo, D. H. (1996). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication impact on families: Trends and future direc-tions. Journal of Special Education, 30, 77–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1994). Peer-directed communicative interactions of augmented language learners with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 527–538.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schepis, M. M., & Reid, D. H. (1995). Effects of a voice output com-munication aid on interactions between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behav-ior Analysis, 28, 73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., Behrmann, M. M., & Sutton, K. A. (1998). Increasing communicative interactions of young chil-dren with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Comparing efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Lee, D. L. (2000). Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communica-tion: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 208–226.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, F. H. (1995). Communication for the speechless (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Slosson, R. L. (1984). Slosson Intelligence Test. New York: Slos-son Educational Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1985). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guid-ance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, T., & Baer, D. (1987). Toward an implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–368.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, K., & Provost, 0. (1996). The effect of communication skills instruction on the integration of workers with severe disabilities in supported employment settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Todman, J., & Dugard, P. (1999). Accessible randomization tests for single case and small-n experimental designs in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P.M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompt-ing strategies. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar