Interpretation of graphic symbol utterances

References

• Ball, L., Marvin, C., Beukelman, D., Lasker, J., & Rupp, D. (1999). Generic talk use by preschool children. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 15, 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1990). The role of rate in communication. Aug-mentative Communication News, 3(5), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1999). Communication partners. Augmentative Communication News, 12(1 & 3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., & Sutton, A. (in press). Towards linguistic com-petence: The language experiences and knowledge of children with extremely limited speech. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, R. (1980). Communication rates of nonspeech expression as a function of manual tasks and linguistic constraints. In Pro-ceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering (pp. 83–87). Toronto, ON: RESNA.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, R. (1987). Guest editorial. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,169.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. (2001, February). Finding structure in language: More noise is better. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science, San Fran-cisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmquist, E., & Sandberg, A. (1996). Sounds and silence: Inter-action in aided language use. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 137–152). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Hoag, L., Bedrosian, J., Johnson, D., & Molineux, B. (1994). Vari-ables affecting perceptions of social aspects of the commu-nicative competence of an adult AAC user. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Toronto, ON: Cana-dian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K. (1999). Latent semantic analysis: A theory of the psychology of language and mind. Discourse Processes, 27, 303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Beer, D., Buchert, L., Casey, E., DiMarco R., & Dolan, K. (1995, December). The effect of grammatical completeness on the communicative competence of AAC users. Poster session presented at the American Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative interac-tion between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: I. Discourse patterns. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 1, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Dattilo, J., English, J., Gutierrez, L., & Hartz, J. (1992). Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 35,865–875.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Klieg, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson Co. (1993). Boardmaker 3.0 for the Macintosh: User's guide and manual. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., Arnott, J., Booth, L., Beattie, W., Brophy, B., & Ricketts, I. (1992). Effect of the "PAL" word prediction system on the quality and quantity of text generation. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 8, 304–311.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., & Jefferson, L. (1999). Natural and synthetic speech comprehension: Comparison of children from two age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 174–182.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tet- zchner and M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London: Whu rr.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1999). Understanding the impact of graphic sign use on the message structure. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, and L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communi-cation: New directions in research and practice. London: Whu rr.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Gallagher, T., Morford, J., & Shahnaz, N. (2000). Con-stituent order patterns and syntactic distinctions in relative clause sentences produced using AAC systems. Applied Psy-cholinguistics, 21, 473–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Morford, J. (1998). Constituent order in picture point-ing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balkom, H., & Welle Donker-Gimbrere, M. (1996). A psy-cholinguistic approach to graphic language use. In S. von Tet-zchner and M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 153–170). London: Whu rr.
   Google Scholar