Grammatical Morphology Acquisition by Children with Complex Communication Needs

References

• Bates, E. (1993). Comprehension and production in early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (Serial No. 233), 222–242.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V., & Gans, B. (1986). Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., McGinnes, J., & Morrow, D. (1991). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 7, 171 — 185.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. (1983). Test for Reception of Grammar. Manche-ster, UK: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D., Brown, B., & Robson, J. (1990). The relationship between phoneme discrimination, speech production and language comprehension in cerebral palsied individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 210–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blockberger, S., & Sutton, A. (2003). Towards linguistic competence: Language experiences and knowledge of children with extremely limited speech. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 63–106). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1974). Talking, understanding, and thinking. In R. Schiefelbusch & L. Lloyd, (Eds.), Language perspec-tives — acquisition, retardation, and intervention (pp. 285–311). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1994). Meaning and expression. In W. Overton & D. Palermo (Eds.), The nature and ontogenesis of meaning (pp. 215–235) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, D., & Fristoe, M. (1987). Effects of test adaptations on test performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J. (1989). Customizing a Minspeak system for a preliterate child: A case example. Augmentative and alternative communication, 5, 89— 100.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. (1982). Language change during language acquisi-tion. In M. Lamb & A. Brown, (Eds.), Advances in child development (pp. 173–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. (1996). Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Hygum Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 80–100). London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test — Revised. Circle Pines MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, M. (1990). Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 17, 607–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, B., Johnston, J., & Brandl, L. (1993). Relationship between mental age and vocabulary development among children with mild mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 97, 541–546.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & Bersani, H. (2000). Speaking up and spelling it out: Personal essays on augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Golinkoff, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1995). Reinterpreting children's sentence comprehension: Toward a new frame-work. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 430–461). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., Dockrell, J., & Woll, B. (1996). The two-word stage in manual signs: Language development in signers with intellectual impairments. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative commu-nication: European perspectives. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, D. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology, (2nd Edn) Boston: PWS-Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., & Schery, T. (1976). The use of grammatical morphemes by children with communication disorders. In D. Morehead & A. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 239–258). Baltimore: Uni-versity Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A., Hemmeter, M., & Hester, P. (1997). The facilitative effects of input on children's language development. In L. Adamson & M. Romski (Eds.), Communication and language acquisition: Discoveries from atypical development (pp. 267–294). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Kelford Smith, A., Thurston, S. Light, J., Parnes, P., & O'Keefe, B. (1989). The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled indivi-duals using microcomputers. Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, 5, 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1991). Methodological issues in the study of language development among children using aided language: Reactant paper 1. In J. Brodin & E. Bjärck-Akesson, (Eds.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 118–123). Vällingby: The Swedish Handicap Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczaj, S. (1983). Crib speech and language play. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative interaction between young non-speaking physically dis-abled children and their primary caregivers: Part 1 - discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 9, 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (4, Serial No. 218).
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, C., Beukelman, D., & Bilyeu, D. (1994). Vocabu-lary-use patterns in preschool children: Effects of context and time sampling. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 10, 224–236.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J., Shi, R., & Allopenna, P. (1996). Perceptual bases of rudimentary grammatical categories: Toward a broad-er conceptualization of bootstrapping. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 263–283). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Newell, A., Alm, N., & Waller, A. (1998). How do members of different language communities compose sentences with a picture-based communication system?A cross-cultural study of picture-based sen-tences constructed by English and Japanese speakers.Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. E. (1991). On differentiated language-learning models and differentiated interventions. In N. Krasnegor, D. Rumbaugh, R. Schiefelbusch, & M. Studdert-Kenne-dy (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 399–428). Hillsdale NJ: Erl-baum.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K.E., & Baker, N. (1984). Recasting. First language, 5, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, S., & Johnston, S. (2001). Evaluating the morphological competence of children with severe speech and physical impairments. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 1362–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Hygum Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (1984). Parent-child interaction and the develop-ment of communicative ability. In R. Schiefelbusch & J. Pickar, (Eds.), The acquisition of communicative compe-tence (pp. 71–107). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., Perlmann, R., & Nathan, D. (1987). Why routines are different: Toward a multiple-factors model of the relation between input and language acquisition. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Children's language, Vol. 6 (pp. 65–97). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stromswold, K. (1990). Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguis-tics.
   Google Scholar
• Stromswold, K. (1994, November). Language comprehension without production: Implications for theories of language acquisition. Paper presented at the Boston Child Lan-guage Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Dench, C. (1998). Connected speech develop-ment in a child with limited language production experience. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 22, 133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Gallagher, T. (1993). Verb class distinctions and AAC language-encoding limitations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1216–1226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Gallagher, T. (1995). Comprehension assess-ment of a child using an AAC system: A comparison of two techniques. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(3), 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Morford, J. (1998). Constituent order in picture pointing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, J. (1996). Words and strategies: Conversations with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 65–88). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. (1994). Adaptations for administering the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised to individuals with severe communication and motor dysfunctions. Mental Retardation, 32, 107–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warren, F. (1999). The power of language. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (1996). Words + outstanding consumer lecture presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, The ISAAC Bulletin, 45, 1–8.
   Google Scholar