Common Questions about AAC Services in Early Intervention

References

• Akhtar, N., Dunham, F., & Dunham, P. (1991). Directive interactions and early vocabulary development: The role of joint attentional focus. Journal of Child Language, 18, 41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASHA (1991). American Speech-Language-Hearing Asso-ciation Report: Augmentative and alternative commu-nication. ASHA, 33 (Suppl. 5), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Basil, C. (1992). Social interaction and learned helplessness in severely disabled children. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 8, 188–199.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., O'Connell, B., & Shore, C. (1987). Language and communication in infancy. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd edn) (pp. 149–203). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Lahm, L. (1983). Critical learning: Multiply handicapped babies get on-line. In M. Behr-mann & L. Lahm (Eds.), Proceedings of the National Conference on the Use of Microcomputers in Special Education. Hartford, CT: ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, DR., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe com-munication disorders in children and adults (2nd edn). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Billeaud, F.P. (1998). Role of the speech-language patholo-gist in the neonatal intensive care unit: Preemies, micropreemies, and medically fragile infants. In F. P. Billeaud (Ed.), Communication disorders in infants and toddlers: Assessment and intervention (2nd edn) (pp. 85–100). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, M., Rose, S., & Berlin, L. (1978). The language of learning: The preschool years. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1993). The transition from infancy to language: Acquiring the power of expression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, A., & Dodd, B. (1996). Do all speech-disordered children have motor deficits? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10, 77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N.C. (2000). Improved comprehension of object names following voice output communication aid use: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 16, 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., & Halle, J.W. (2002). Breakdowns and repairs in conversations between beginning AAC users and their partners. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Implementing an augmentative communication system: Exemplary strategies for beginning communicators (pp. 219–272). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., McLean, J. E., McLean, L. K., & Johnston, S. (1995). Initiation and repair of intentional communica-tion acts by adults with severe to profound cognitive disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1334–1348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brinker, R. P., & Lewis, M. (1982). Making the world work with microcomputers: A learning prosthesis for handi-capped infants. Exceptional Children, 49(2), 163–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M. J., & Lunger, J. (1995). Empowering system users in peer training. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1988). Promoting the acquisition and generalization of conversational skills by individuals with severe disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 4, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Dollaghan, C. (1982). The use of communication boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 47, 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N., & Jorgensen, C.M. (1992). A technical assistance model for promoting integrated communica-tion supports and services for students with severe disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 13, 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, T. C. (1999). Early understanding and production of graphic symbols. Child Development, 70, 1314–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. (2002). Communicative spontaneity in individuals with high support needs: An exploratory consideration of causation. International Journal of Disability, Develop-ment, and Education, 49, 225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. (2003). Communicative spontaneity of children with high support needs who use augmentative and alternative communication systems II: Antecedents and effectiveness of communication. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 19, 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S., Remington, B., & Light, P. (1986). The role of referential speech in sign learning by mentally retarded children: A comparison of total communication and sign-alone training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 419–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crais, E. (1992). Fast-mapping: A new look at word learning. In R. Chapman, (Ed.), Processes in language acquisition and disorders (pp. 159–185). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C., & Ball, L. (1998). Strategies for promoting vocal development in young children relying on AAC: Three case illustrations. Proceedings of the 21st Annual RESNA Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. (2001). A communication "tools" model for AAC intervention with early communicators. Proceedings of the 24th Annual RESNA Conference, Reno NV.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. (2002). Expanding children's early augmented behaviors to support symbolic development. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Implementing an augmentative communication system: Exemplary stra-tegies for beginning communicators (pp. 219–272). Balti-more: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C., Shapley, K., Linke, M., Clark, J., Elliott, J., Bartels, K., Aaron, E. (2000) Characteristics of intentional communication in young children with physical impair-ments. Presentation at the 9th Biennial ISAAC Interna-tional Conference on AAC, Washington, DC: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. (1989). Developmental apraxia and augmentative or alternative communication: A case example. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 5, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cumley, G. (1997) Introduction of an augmentative and alternative modality: Effects on the quality and quantity of communication interactions of children with severe phono-logical disorders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, L. S., & Reichle, J. (1991). Replacing excess behavior with an initial communicative repertoire. In J. Reichle, J. York, & J. Sigafoos (Eds.), Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P. A., & Marriner, N. A. (1995). Augmentative and alternative communication: Treatment principles and strategies. Seminars in Speech and Language, 16, 140–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downing, J. (1988). Active versus passive programming: A critique of IEP objectives for students with the most severe disabilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 197–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst, C., & Lowe, L. W. (1986). From reflex to symbol: Describing, explaining and fostering communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 2, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, W. (1984). Yes/No answers and the verbally delayed child. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., et al. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. San Diego: Singular Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, L. J., Fell, H. J., Mooraj, Z., Delta, H., & Moscoe, D. (1996). Baby-babble blanket: Infant interface with automatic data collection. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 110–119.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, S., Timler, G., & Yoder, D.E. (1985). Strategies for the prevention and repair of communication breakdown in interactions with communication board users. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M. (1992). An initial vocabulary for nonspeak-ing preschool children based on developmental and environmental language scores. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 8, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. (1998). Adults with severe aphasia. In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe com-munication disorders in children and adults 2nd edn, (pp. 465–500). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L., & Kimelman, M. D. Z. (2000). AAC and aphasia: Cognitive-linguistic considerations. In D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, H., & Opper, S. (1979). Piaget's theory of intellectual development (2nd edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Glennen, S., & McPartland, L. (1999, November). But won't they stop talking? Speech development after AAC imple-mentation. Paper presented at the 74th annual conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gobbi, L., Cipani, E., Hudson, C., & Lapenta-Neudeck, R. (1986). Developing spontaneous requesting among chil-dren with severe retardation. Mental Retardation, 24, 357–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goossens', C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., CraM, S. & Elder, P. (1992). Engineering the classroom environment for interactive symbolic commu-nication: An emphasis on the developmental period, 18 months to five years. Wauconda, IL: Don Johnston Developmental Equipment, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gur-Arie, P. (2003). Prerequisites for a school-based AAC evaluation. ADVANCE for Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists, January 20, 2003, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Hanzlik, J. R. (1990). Nonverbal interaction patterns of mothers and their infants with cerebral palsy. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 334–343.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J., Bronicki, G. J. B., & Guess, D. (1987). Opportunities to express preferences and make choices among students with severe disabilities in classroom settings. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. C., Morehouse, T. B., & Gutmann, M. (2002). AAC strategies for enhancing the usefulness of natural speech in children with severe intelligibility challenges. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Implementing an augmentative communication system: Exemplary stra-tegies for beginning communicators (pp. 433–452). Balti-more: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Carter, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 14, 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. A., & Duncum, J. E. (1995). Comparison of sign alone and in combination with an electronic communication device in early language intervention: Case study. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 11, 249–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. V. (1981). A comparison of sign and verbal language training with nonverbal retarded children. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 46, 113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, K. A. & Lloyd, L. (1988). Early cognitive skills as prerequisites to augmentative and alternative commu-nication use: What are we waiting for? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Lasker, J. P., & Bedrosian, J. L. (2000). Acceptance of AAC by adults with acquired disorders. In D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K. (1999). Babbling in infants with cerebral palsy. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 13, 249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K (2000). Improving the design of AAC technologies for young children. Presentation at the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication conference,Washington, DC: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communication interaction between young nonspeaking physically dis-abled children and their caretakers: Part 1: Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Roberts, B., DiMarco, R., & Greiner, N. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 153–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. L. (1996). Why do infants begin to talk? Language as an unintended consequence. Journal of Child Lan-guage, 23, 251–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, E. T. (1980). Early identification and treatment of children at risk for speech development. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communica-tion: Analysis and intervention. (pp. 49–80). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mar, H. & Sall, N. (1999). Profiles of the expressive commu-nication skills of children and adolescents with severe cognitive disabilities. Evaluation and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchman, V. A., Miller, R., & Bates, E. A. (1991). Babble and first words in children with focal brain injury. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marfo, K. (1992). Correlates of maternal directiveness with children who are developmentally delayed. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 219–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, L., Kearney, B., & Checkoff, M. (1989). Forms and functions of communication by children with Down syndrome and nonretarded children with their mothers. In S. von Tetzchner, L. S. Siegel, & L. Smith (Eds.), The social and cognitive aspects of normal and atypical language development (pp. 113–127). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• McIlvane, W. J., Bass, R. W., O'Brien, J. M., Gerovac, B. J., & Stoddard, L. T. (1984). Spoken and signed naming of foods after receptive exclusion training in severe retardation. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, C., & Mervis, C. (1988). Role of adult input in young children's category evolution: I. An observational study. Journal of Child Language, 15, 257–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, D., Light, J., & Schlosser, R. (2000, November). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) on natural speech development: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 75th annual conference of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, Wa-shington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Paul, R. (1995). The clinical assessment of language comprehension. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1998). Intervention techniques for functional communication training: A research review. Paper pre-sented at the 8th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, Dublin, Ireland: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Santogrossi, J. (1985). A prompt-free strategy to teach pictorial communication system use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 143–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., Iacono, T., & Williams, R. (1990). Commu-nication options for persons with severe and profound disabilities: State of the art and future directions. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handi-caps, 15, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., Wilk, D., & Carson, P. (2000). A retrospective analysis of technology use patterns of students with autism over a five-year period. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. W. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language competence and performance among AAC users. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Oller, D. K., Eilers, R. E., Neal, A. R., & Cobo-Lewis, A. B. (1998). Late onset canonical babbling: A possible early marker of abnormal development. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 249–263.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, R. (2001). Language development: An introduction (5th edn.). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Prizant, B. M., Wetherby, A. M., & Rydell, P. J. (2000). Communication intervention issues for children with autism spectrum disorders. In A. M. Wetherby & B. M. Prizant (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders: A transactional developmental perspective (pp. 193–224). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Beukelman, D., & Light, J. (2002). Implementing an augmentative communication system: Exemplary stra-tegies for beginning communicators. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J, Halle, J., & Johnson, S. (1993). Developing an initial communicative repertoire: Applications and issues for persons with severe disabilities. In A. P. Kaiser & D. B. Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children's communication: Research foundations for intervention (pp. 105–138). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Rescorla, L. (1980). Overextension in early language devel-opment. Journal of Child Language, 7, 321–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1989). An analysis of visual-graphic symbol meanings for two nonspeaking adults with severe mental retardation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 9, 281–285.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R., & Adamson, L. (1999). Commu-nication patterns of youth with mental retardation with and without their speech-output communication devices. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 104, 249–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Williams, S., Colbert, N., & Morgan, V. (2001). Communication profiles of toddlers with severe developmental disabilities. Poster session presentation at the 76th annual conference of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Reumann, R., & Pate, J. L. (1989). Youngsters with moderate or severe retardation and severe spoken language impairments. I: Extant communication patterns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 366–373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross, B. R., & Cress, C. J. (2001, November). Comparison of receptive language assessment tools for young non-speaking children. Presentation at the 76th annual conference of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (1993). Analyzing the communication environment to increase functional com-munication. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (2000). Tangible symbols, tangible outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 16, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., & Bashir, A. S. (1980). Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: Preliminary considerations. Journal of Speech and Hear-ing Disorders, 45, 408–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel, E. B., & Cress, C. J. (2002). Overview of the emergence of early AAC behaviors: Progression from communicative to symbolic skills. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Implementing an augmen-tative communication system: Exemplary strategies for beginning communicators (pp. 219–272). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Woodyatt, G., Keen, D., Tait, K., Tucker, M., Roberts-Pennell, D., & Pittendreigh, N. (2000). Identify-ing potential communicative acts in children with developmental and physical disabilities. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, F. H. (1995). Communication for the speechless (3rd ed). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (1989). Understanding social interaction and language acquisition: Sentences are not enough. In M. Bernstein & J. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 83–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (1995). Issues in the study of input: Fine-tuning, universality, individual and developmental differences and necessary causes. In P. Fletcher and B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Handbook of child language (pp. 180–193). Cam-bridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder-McLean, L., Solomonson, B., McLean, J., & Sack, S. (1984). Structuring joint action routines: A strategy for facilitating communication and language development in the classroom. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5, 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, M. S. (1978). Satisfying inquisitive adults: Some simple methods of answering yes/no questions. Journal of Child Language, 5, 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, M., & Lewis, M. (1993). Contingency, means-end skills, and the use of technology in infant intervention. Infants and Young Children, 5, 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• Swinth, Y., Anson, D., & Deitz, J. (1993). Single-switch computer access for infants and toddlers. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 1031–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannock, R. (1988). Mothers' directiveness in their interac-tions with their children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 93, 154–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tannock, R., Girolametto, L. & Siegel, L.S. (1992). Language intervention with children who have develop-mental delays: Effects of an interactive approach. Amer-ican Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 145–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1984). Cognitive bases of lexical development: Object permanence and relational words. Journal of Child Language, 11, 477–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57, 1454–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Lloyd, L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. Blackstone (Edn.), Augmentative Communication: An introduction (pp. 49–162). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hear-ing Association.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1992). Introduction to symbolic and augmentative communication. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherby, A. M., Cain, D. H., Yonclas, D. G., & Walker, V. G. (1988). Analysis of intentional communication of normal children from the prelinguistic to the multiword stage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 240–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wetherby, A., Warren, S., & Reichle, J. (1998). Transitions in prelinguistic communication. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, M.J., Bacon, C.K., & Shannon, M.S. (1995). Prelinguistic intervention: Procedures for young children with disabilities. Presentation at the 70th annual con-ference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Asso-ciation, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Lasker, J., Siegel-Causey, E., Beukelman, D., & Ball, L. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, D., & Kraat, A. (1983). Intervention issues in nonspeech communication. In J. Miller, D. Yoder, & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Non-speech Communication. ASHA Reports, 12, 27–51. Rock-ville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, P. (1987). Relationship between degree of infant handicap and clarity of infant cues. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 91, 639–641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoder, P., & Feagans, L. (1988). Mothers' attributions of communication to prelinguistic behavior of developmen-tally delayed and mentally retarded infants. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 93, 36–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoder, P, & Layton, T. (1988). Speech following sign language training in autistic children with minimal verbal language. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P., & Warren, S. (1998). Maternal responsivity predicts the prelinguistic communication intervention that facilitates generalized intentional communication. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 41, 1207–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P. J., Warren, S. F., & McCathren, R. B. (1998). Determining spoken language prognosis in children with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 7, 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar