The Understandability of AAC: A Conversation Analysis Study of Acquired Dysarthria

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), (pp. ix - xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barefoot, S. M., Bochner, J. H., Johnson, B. A., & Eigen, B. A. v. (1993). Rating deaf speakers' comprehensibility: an exploratory investigation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2(3), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., Clarke, M., & Collins, S. (2001). Conversation Analysis and AAC: From principle to practice. Commu-nication Matters, 15(2), 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Tarplee, C. (2000, August). Children using AAC systems with peers: Exploring turns in talk. Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Conference of the Interna-tional Society of Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Markova, I. (1999). Interaction between impaired and unimpaired speakers: Inter-subjectivity and the interplay of culturally shared and situation specific knowledge. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 339–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, S., Markova, I., & Murphy, J. (1997). Bringing conversations to a close: the management of closings in interactions between AAC users and 'natural' speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11(6), 467–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrie, P., Mackenzie, C., & McCall, J. (2001). The influence of acquired dysarthria on conversational turn taking. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15(5), 383–398.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). 'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnornethodology. Cam-bridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. (2003). Formulating research questions: linking theory to the research process. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: toward evidence-based practice (pp. 43–55). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D., & Wilkins, D. (1999). Slipping through the timestream: social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. In D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan & M. Maxwell (Eds.), Constructing (in) competence: dis-abling evaluations in clinical and social interaction (pp. 49–82). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hustad, K., & Beukelman, D. (2000). Integrating AAC strategies with natural speech in adults. In D. Beukelman, K. Yorkston & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neuro-logic disorders (pp. 83–106). Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hustad, K., & Beukelman, D. (2001). Effects of linguistic cues and stimulus cohesion on intelligibility of severely dysarthric speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Re-search, 44, 497–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K., & Beukelman, D. (2002). Listener comprehen-sion of severely dysarthric speech: effects of linguistic cues and stimulus cohesion. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 45, 545–558.
   Google Scholar
• Hustad, K., Beukelman, D., & Yorkston, K. (1998). Functional outcome assessment in dysarthria. Seminars in Speech and Language, 19(3), 291–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Woofitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Burke, R., Elliot, J., & Ross, M. (2001). Communication interaction differences between natural speaker and AAC users with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 9(1), 70–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, W., Mathy, P., Azuma, T., & Liss, J. (2004). The effect of aging and synthetic topic cues on the intellig-ibility of dysarthric speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(1), 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1990). On the communication process: speaker-listener interaction and the development of speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 220–230.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., & Bryan, K. (2001). SPPARC (supporting partners of people with aphasia in relationships and conversation): a resource pack. Bicester: Speechmark.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy, P., Yorkston, K., & Gutmann, M. (2000). AAC for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In D. Beukelman & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neuro-logic disorders (pp. 183–231). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & West, C. (1992). Future directions in the study of interactions involving AAC users. Paper presented at the 2nd ISAAC Research Symposium in AAC, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay, A., & Newell, A. (1992). Conversation analysis in AAC. Paper presented at the 2nd ISAAC Research Symposium in AAC, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Willer, E., & Soto, G. (2000, August). Capturing the complexity of aided conversations: a conversation analysis perspective. Paper presented at the Sixth Biennial Research Symposium of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Wa-shington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Willer, E., & Soto, G. (2002). Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: Variations across partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M., & Damico, J. (1998). Joint productions as a conversational strategy in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 12(6), 459–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation Analysis: the study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, A. (1999). Meaning of a disability - the lived experience of paralysis. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis (pp. 2–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (2000). When 'others' initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair In conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: social science & conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweidel, G. (1992). Management strategies in the commu-nication of speaking persons and persons with a speech disability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Beukelman, D., & Ball, L. (2002). Manage-ment of dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Geriatrics and Aging, 5(1), 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Strand, E., & Kennedy, M. (1996). Compre-hensibility of dysarthric speech: implications for assess-ment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5(1), 55–66.
   Google Scholar