Perceptions of AAC: An Ethnographic Investigation of Mexican-American Families

References

• Angelo, D. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(1), 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D., Jones, S., & Kokaska, S. (1995). Family perspective on alternative and augmentative communica-tion: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. B., & Battle, D. E. (1993). Cultural diversity in the development of language. In D. E. Battle (Ed.), Communication disorders in multicultural populations (pp. 158–185). Boston: Andover Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (1992). Understanding ethnographic texts (Vol. 25). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan-Brown, J. (2001). Evaluating special education services for learners from ethnically diverse groups: Getting it right. JASH, 26, 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1999). Communication partners. Augmenta-tive Communication News, 12, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, B., & Biklan, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, S. (2000). Delivery of AAC services to a rural American Indian community. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 9(2), 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, S., & Midgette, S. (2000). Augmentative/alternative communication and assistive technology. In T. Coleman (Ed.), Clinical management of communication disorders in culturally diverse children (pp. 285–333). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, M. J. (1992). Ethnic, cultural, and language diversity in intervention settings. In E. W. Lynch & M. J. Hanson (Eds.), Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with young children and their families (pp. 3–18). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, B. (1992). Cultural diversity, families, and the special education system: Communication and empowerment. Teachers College Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, B., Grenot-Scheyer, M., Smith-Lewis, M., Park, H.-S., Xin, F., & Schwartz, I. (1995). Developing culturally inclusive services for individuals with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handi-caps, 20, 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, B., Rueda, R., & Kalyanpur, M. (1999). Cultural reciprocity in sociocultural perspective: Adapting the normalization principle for family collaboration. Excep-tional Children, 66(1), 123–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, O., & Harris, O. (1996). Cultural aspects in the development of AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, O. (2002). Augmentative and alternative commu-nication in Israel: Results from a Family Survey. AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 255–266.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. (1997a, June). Cultural Strategies for AAC. Advance for Directors in Rehabilitation, 6, 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. (1997b). Culturally Inclusive Assessments for Children Using Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication. Journal of Children's Communication Develop-ment, 19(1), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. (2002). Thinking about conducting culturally-sensitive research in augmentative and alternative com-munication. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 18, 267–273.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M., & Saenz, T. I. (2003). Challenges and strategies for conducting survey and focus group research with culturally diverse groups. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 12, 209–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huer, M., & Parette, H. P. (1999). Examining the perspectives of families: Issues related to conducting cross-cultural research. In F. Loncke & J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alter-native communication: New Directions in research and practice (pp. 290–300). London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M., Parette, H., & Saenz, T. I. (2001). Conversations with Mexican Americans regarding children with dis-abilities and augmentative and alternative communica-tion. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22, 197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Hyun, J., & Fowler, S. (1995). Respect, cultural sensitivity, and communication. Teaching Exceptional Children, Fall, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanpur, M. (1999). Special education epistemology as a product of western culture: Implications for non-western families of children with disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22, 111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanpur, M., & Harry, B. (1999). Culture in special education: Building reciprocal family-professional relation-ships. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanpur, M., Harry, B., & Skrtic, T. (2000). Equity and advocacy expectations of culturally diverse families' participation in special education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47, 119–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, C., & Parette, H. (2000). Barriers to minority family involvement in assistive technology decision-making processes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 384–392.
   Google Scholar
• Launonen, K. (2003). Manual sign as a tool of commu-nicative interaction and language: the development of children with Down Syndrome and their parents. In Stephen von Tetzchner and Nicola Grove (Eds.), Devel-opmental Issues in Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication (pp. 83–122). London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, E. W., & Hanson, M. (1992). Developing cross-cultural competence: a guide for working with young children and their families. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McCord, M. S., & Soto, G. (2000). Working with low-income Latino families: issues and strategies. American Speech Language and Hearing Association, Special Inter-est Division: Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 9(2), 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (1997). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & Brotherson, M. J. (1996). Family-centered assistive technology assessment. Intervention in School & Clinic, 32(2), 104–113.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & Angelo, D. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families: Trends and future directions. Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 77–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., Brotherson, M. J., Hoge, D., & Hostetler, S. (1996, December). Family-centered augmentative and alternative communication issues: implications across cultures. Paper presented at the International Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs, Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., Brotherson, M. J., & Huer, M. B. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 177 — 190.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & McMahan, G. A. (2002). What should we expect of assistive technology: Being sensitive to family goals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(1), 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1997). Special education teacher attitudes towards AAC: Preliminary survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 186–197.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (2000). "We have come a long way ... " AAC and multiculturalism: From cultural awareness to cultural responsibility. American Speech Language and Hearing Association, Special Interest Division: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(2), 1 — 3.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Huer, M., & Taylor, O. (1997). Multicultural issues. In L. Lloyd, D. Fuller & H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: a handbook of principles and practices (pp. 406–413).
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. (1998). The ethnographer's method (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S., & Parette, H. P. (2002). Native Americans and augmentative and alternative communication issues. Multiple Voices, 5(1), 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, O., & Clarke, M. (1994). Culture and communica-tion disorders: A theoretical framework. Seminars in Speech and Language, 15(2), 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau, State of California Demo-graphic Profiles. (n.d.) US Bureau of the Census, 2000 [Data File]. Available from US Census Bureau Web site, http//www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html
   Google Scholar