The Effect of Direct Instruction and Writer's Workshop on the Early Writing Skills of Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, E. W. & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H. & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R. & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe com-munication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. A. (1989). Phonological awareness and word recognition: Assessment and intervention. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective (pp. 133–158). Bos-ton: College-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, B.A. (1991). Early intervention for children's reading problems: Clinical applications of the research in phonological awareness. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read — a causal connection. Nature, 30 (3), 419–421.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Children's reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Ports-mouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carrow-Wolfolk, E. (1985). Test for auditory comprehension of language-revised. Allen, TX: Developmental Learning Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. M. (1995). Phonics they use: Words for reading and writing (2nd edn). New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A. & Hjelmquist, E. (1996). Phonologic awareness and literacy abilities in nospeaking preschool children with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 138–153.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S. & Bruner, E.C. (1978). DISTAR reading: An instructional system. Chicago: Science Research Associ-ates.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, B. E. (1993). The development of literacy in individuals with severe congenital speech and motor impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, B. E. & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congenital speech impairments. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 15, 156–173.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. R. & Gillet, J. W. (1993). Teaching kids to spell. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Glennen, S. L. & DeCoste, D. C. (1997). The handbook of augmentative and alternative communication. San Diego, CA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. & Harris, K.R. (1994). Implications of constructivism for teaching writing to students with special needs. Journal of Special Education, 28, 275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1994). A fresh look at writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Kameenui, E., Simmons, D., Chard, D., & Dickson, S. (1997). Direct-instruction reading. In S. Stahl & D. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading (pp. 59–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kelford Smith, A., Thurston, S., Light, J., Parnes, P., & O'Keefe, B. (1989). The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled indivi-duals using microcomputers. Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, 5, 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A., Steelman, J. D., Pierce, P., Yoder, D. E., & Staples, A. (1993). Developing augmentative and alternative communication technology in order to devel-op literacy. Technology and Disability, 2, 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A. & Yoder, D. E. (1992). Literacy issues in persons with severe speech and physical impairments. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 156–201). NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A. & Yoder, D. E. (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): What is and what might be. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, I. Y., Rubin, H., Duques, S., & Carlisle, J. (1985). Linguistic abilities and spelling proficiency in kindergartners and adult poor spellers. In D. B. Gray & J. R. Kavanagh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 163–176). Parkton, MD: New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. C. & McNaughton, D. (1993). Literacy and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): The expectations and priorities of parents and teachers. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, V. A. (1986). Phonological awareness: The role of reading experience. Cognition, 24, 65–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson, J. & Apel, K. (2000). Spelling assessment: Charting a path to optimal intervention. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 50–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness, D., McGuinness, C., & Donohue, J. (1995). Phonological training and the alphabet principle: Evi-dence for reciprocal causality. Reading Research Quar-terly, 30, 830–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. & Tawney, J. (1992). Spelling instruction for adults who use augmentative and alternative commu-nication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K. & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Organization for Rare Disorders, Inc.(1996). Retrieved July, 2003, from http://www.rarediseases.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2000). Principles and methods of spelling instruc-tion: Application for poor spellers. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 66–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, D. & Kameenui, E. (1998). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, J. (1995). Phonemic awareness training: Application of principles of direct instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Djfficulties, 11, 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, D. (1992). Blending whole language and systematic direct instruction. The Reading Teacher, 46, 38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traweek, D. & Berninger, V. W. (1997). Comparisons of beginning literacy programs: Alternative paths to the same learning outcome. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 160–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. & Siegle, L. (1995). Phonological recoding and phoneme awareness in early literacy: A develop-mental approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 854–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. & Siegel, L. (1999). Phonological proces-sing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 15, 191–211.
   Google Scholar