The effect of color on the recognition and use of line drawings by children with severe intellectual disabilities

References

• Beukelman D. R., Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults(2nd edn.). Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1998
   Google Scholar
• Bovet J., Vauclair J. Picture recognition in animals and humans. Behavioural Brain Research 2000; 109: 143–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady N. C., McLean L. Simultaneous and delayed matching to sample in gesture users and speakers with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1998; 19: 409–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady N. C., Saunders K. J. Considerations in the effective teaching of object-to-symbol matching. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 112–116
   Google Scholar
• Compic. COMPIC dictionary. Compic, Mount Waverly 1994
   Google Scholar
• Dannemiller J. L. Color constancy and color vision during infancy; Methodological and empirical issues. Perceptual constancy: Why things look as they do, V. Walsh, J. Kulikowski. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 1998
   Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. S., de Mendoza O. A., Anderson K. L. Multiple factors in early symbol use: Instructions, similarity and age in understanding a symbol-referent relation. Cognitive Development 1999; 14: 299–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin N. K., Mirenda P., Phillips G. Comparisons of five symbol assessment protocols with nondisabled preschoolers and learners with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 73–77
   Google Scholar
• Graham S. A., Poulin-Dubois D. Infants' reliance on shape to generalize novel labels to animate and inanimate objects. Journal of Child Language 1999; 26: 295–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C. J., Paivio A., Clark J. M. Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin 1996; 120: 113–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh W. J., Reichle J. Communication intervention for the “difficult-to-teach” severely handicapped. Teaching functional language, S. F. Warren, A. Rogers-Warren. Pro-Ed., TX 1985; 157–194
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer D. A., Spooner F., Test D. W., Koorland M. A. Extending the application of constant time delay; teaching requesting skills to students with severe multiple disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children 1993; 16: 235–253
   Google Scholar
• Mineo Mollica B. Representational competence. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC, J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2003; 107–146
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P., Locke P. A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disability. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1989; 54: 131–140
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Education and Training. Special education handbook for school. New South Wales Department of Education and Training, Sydney 1998
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Education and Training. Disability criteria. New South Wales Department of Education and Training, Sydney 2000
   Google Scholar
• Reichle J., Beukelman D. R., Light J. C. Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2002
   Google Scholar
• Reichle J., Keogh W. J. Communication instruction for learners with severe handicaps: Some unresolved issues. Education of learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary service strategies, R. H. Horner, L. H. Meyer, H. D. B. Fredericks. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1986; 189–219
   Google Scholar
• Reichle J., York J., Sigafoos J. Implementing augmentative and alternative communication; Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1991
   Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 281–285
   Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1996
   Google Scholar
• Rossion B., Pourtois G. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 2004; 33: 217–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland C., Schweigert P. Tangible symbols: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 226–234
   Google Scholar
• Rowland C., Schweigert P. Tangible symbols, tangible outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2000; 16: 61–78
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik R. A., Romski M. A. Representational matching skills of persons with severe retardation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1986; 2: 160–164
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson J., Linfoot K. W. Choice making as a natural context for teaching early communication board use to a ten-year-old boy with no spoken language and with severe intellectual disability. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1995; 20: 263–286
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson J., Linfoot K. W. Pictures as communication symbols for students with severe intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 244–255
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson K. M., McIlvane W. J. Considerations in teaching graphic symbols to beginning communicators. Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC, J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman, J. C. Light. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2002; 273–322
   Google Scholar