Moving Targets: The Effect of Animation on Identification of Action Word Representations

References

• Ainsworth S. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 2006; 16: 183–198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth S., VanLabeke N. Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction 2004; 14: 241–255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom L. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1970
   Google Scholar
• Bloom L. Language development from two to three. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991
   Google Scholar
• Bloom L., Lahey M. Language development and language disorders. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Brady N., McLean L. Simultaneous and delayed matching to sample in gesture users and speakers with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1998; 19: 409–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan T. C. Factors affecting graphic symbol understanding in the third year: Language, similarity and iconicity. Cognitive Development 2000; 15: 207–236
   Google Scholar
• Catrambone R., Seay A. F. Using animation to help students learn computer algorithms. Human Factors 2002; 44: 495–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanLin L. Attributes of animation for learning scientific knowledge. Journal of Instructional Psychology 2000; 27: 228–238
   Google Scholar
• Cook M. P. Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education 2006; 90: 1073–1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. S., Burns N. M. Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition 1994; 52: 83–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. S., Mendoza O. A. P., Anderson K. M. Multiple factors in early symbol use: Instructions, similarity, and age in understanding a symbol-referent relation. Cognitive Development 1999; 14: 299–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. S., Pierroutsakos S. L., Troseth G. L. The three R's of pictorial competence. Annals of Child Development 1996; 12: 1–48
   Google Scholar
• Dixon L. A functional analysis of photo-object matching skills or severely retarded adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1981; 14: 465–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs E., Jenkins S. J. The effects of grade level, type of motion, cueing strategy, pictorial complexity, and color on children's interpretation of implied motion in pictures. Journal of Experimental Education 2001; 69: 229–242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn L. M., Dunn L. M. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test3rd ed. American Guidance Service, Inc, Circle Pines, MN 1997
   Google Scholar
• Franklin K., Mirenda P., Phillips G. Comparison of five symbol assessment protocols with nondisabled preschoolers and learners with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 63–77
   Google Scholar
• Friedman S., Stevenson M. Developmental changes in the understanding of implied motion in two-dimensional pictures. Child Development 1975; 46: 773–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman S. R. Learning in complex domains: When and why do multiple representations help. Learning and Instruction 2003; 13: 239–244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein L. H., Oakley D. A. Color versus orientation discrimination in severely brain-damaged and normal adults. Cortex 1986; 22: 261–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross D., Soken N., Rosengren K. S., Pick A. D., Pillow B. H., Melendez P. Children's understanding of action lines and the static representation of speed of locomotion. Child Development 1991; 62: 1124–1141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty M. Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction 2004; 14: 343–351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher J., Smiley P., Charney R. Emergence of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review 1983; 90: 72–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagaroo V., Wilkinson K. Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2008; 24: 29–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kose G., Beilin H., O'Connor J. Children's comprehension of actions depicted in photographs. Developmental Psychology 1983; 19: 636–643
   Google Scholar
• Kozma R. The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction 2003; 13: 205–226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard L. Meaning in child language. Grune and Stratton, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Levin B., Rappaport Hovav M. Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 1991; 41: 123–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe R. Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction 2004; 14: 257–274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe R., Pramono H. Using graphics to support comprehension of dynamic information in texts. Information Design Journal 2006; 14: 22–34
   Google Scholar
• Mayer R. E., Hegarty M., Mayer S., Campbell J. When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2005; 11: 256–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall S. J. P., De Bruijn O., Curry M. B. Exploring the effects of icon characteristics on user performance: The role of icon concreteness, complexity, & distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2000; 6: 291–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineo Mollica B. Representational competence. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC, J. Light, D. Beukelman, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 2003; 107–146
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P., Locke P. A. A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 131–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molinari G., Tapiero I. Integration of new domain-related states and events from texts and illustrations by subjects with high and low prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction 2007; 17: 304–321
   Google Scholar
• Park O., Hopkins R. Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: A review. Instructional Science 1993; 21: 427–449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petre M., Green T. R.G. Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that ‘seeing’ an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 1993; 4: 55–70
   Google Scholar
• Ploetzner R., Lowe R. Dynamic visualizations and learning. Learning and Instruction 2004; 14: 235–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramer A. Syntactic styles in emerging language. Journal of Child Language 1976; 3: 48–62
   Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A., Adamson L. B. Framework for studying how children with developmental disabilities develop language through augmented means. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1997; 13: 172–178
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum L. D., Saldana H. M., Carello C. Dynamical constraints on pictorial action lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993; 19: 381–396
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheiter K., Gerjets P., Catrambone R. Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures. Computers in Human Behavior 2006; 22: 9–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik R. A., Romski M. A. Representational matching skills of persons with severe retardation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1986; 2: 160–164
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson M. B., Friedman S. L. Developmental changes in the understanding of pictorial representations of sound. Developmental Psychology 1986; 22: 686–690
   Google Scholar
• Travers R., Alvarado V. The design of pictures for children in elementary school. AV Communication Review 1970; 10: 47–64
   Google Scholar
• Troseth G. L. Getting a clear picture: Young children's understanding of a televised image. Developmental Science 2003; 6: 247–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky B., Morrison J. B., Betrancourt M. Animation: Can it facilitate. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2002; 57: 247–262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal D. J., Scudder K. V., DeLoache J. S. Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1997; 18: 37–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meij J., deJong T. Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulations-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction 2006; 16: 199–212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar