Recognition and Use of Line Drawings by Children with Severe Intellectual Disabilities: The Effects of Color and Outline Shape

References

• Baldwin D. A. Priorities in children's expectations about object label reference: Form over color. Child Development 1989; 60: 1291–1306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton A., Sevcik R. A., Romski M. A. Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 10–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MA 2005
   Google Scholar
• Biederman I., Ju G. Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1988; 20: 38–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovet D., Vauclair J. Picture recognition in animals and humans. Behavioral Brain Research 2000; 109: 143–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady N. C., McLean L. Simultaneous and delayed matching to sample in gesture users and speakers with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1998; 19: 409–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady N. C., Saunders K. J. Considerations in the effective teaching of object-to-symbol matching. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 112–116
   Google Scholar
• Compic. COMPIC dictionary. Mount Waverly, Vic., COMPIC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Dixon L. S. A functional analysis of photo-matching skills of severely retarded adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1981; 14: 465–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin N. K., Mirenda P., Phillips G. Comparisons of five symbol assessment protocols with nondisabled preschoolers and learners with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 73–77
   Google Scholar
• Graham S. A., Poulin-Dubois D. Infant's reliance on shape to generalize novel labels to animate and inanimate objects. Journal of Child Language 1999; 26: 295–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward W. G. Effects of outline shape in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and performance 1998; 24: 427–440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C. J., Paivio A., Clark J. M. Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin 1996; 120: 113–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh W., Reichle J. Communication intervention for the “difficult-to-teach” severely handicapped. Teaching functional language, S. F Warren, A Rogers-Warren. Pro-Ed, TX 1985; 157–194
   Google Scholar
• Koul R. K., Schlosser R. W. Effects of synthetic speech output in the learning of graphic symbols of varied iconicity. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 1278–1284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer D. A., Spooner F., Test D., Koorland M. A. Extending the application of constant time delay: Teaching requesting skills to students with severe multiple disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children 1993; 16: 235–253
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones T. J., Luckhurst L. Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things. Memory and Cognition 2002; 30: 489–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loncke F. T., Campbell J., England A. M., Haley T. Multimodality: A basis for Augmentative and Alternative Communication – psycholinguistic, cognitive and clinical/educational. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 169–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineo Mollica B. Representational competence. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice, J. C Light, D. R Beukelman, J Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MA 2003; 107–145
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P., Locke P. A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disability. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1989; 54: 131–140
   Google Scholar
• Namy L. L. What's in a name when it isn't a word? 17-months-olds' mapping of non-verbal symbols to object categories. Infancy 2001; 2: 73–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namy L. L., Campbell A. L., Tomasello M. The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development 2004; 5: 37–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSW Department of Education and Training. Special education handbook for schools. NSW Department of Education and Training, Sydney 1998
   Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Breaking the speech barrier. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Augmentative communication and early intervention. Infants and Young Children 2005; 18: 174–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion B., Pourtois G. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface details in basic-level object recognition. Perception 2004; 33: 217–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland C., Schweigert P. Tangible symbols: Symbolic communication for individuals with multi-sensory impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 226–234
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W. Selecting graphic symbols for an initial requesting lexicon. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Towards evidence-based practice, R. W. Scholsser. Academic Press, CA 2003; 347–401
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W., Sigafoos J. Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communicaiton 2002; 18: 102–123
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik R. A., Romski M. A., Wilkinson K. M. Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 161–169
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson J. The effect of color on the recognition and use of line drawings by children with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 44–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J., Linfoot K. W. Pictures as communication symbols for students with severe intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 244–255
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner S., Ovreeide K. D., Jorgensen K. K., Ormhaug B. M., Oxholm B., Warme R. Acquisition of graphic communication by a young girl without comprehension of spoken language. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 1335–1346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann F., T., Sharpe S. L., Gegenfurtner K. R. The contributions of color to recognition memory for natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2002; 28: 509–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurm L. H., Legge G. E., Isenberg L. M., Luebker A. Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993; 19: 899–911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovetich W., Young T. The effects of representativeness and concreteness on the “guessability” of Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4: 35–39
   Google Scholar