The profiles of students with significant cognitive disabilities and complex communication needs

References

• Alant, E. (1999). Students with little or no functional speech in schools for students with severe mental retardation in South Africa, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 83–94. doi:10.1080/07434619912331278595.
   Google Scholar
• Albus, D., & Thurlow, M. (2012). Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) participation policies (Synthesis Report 88). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Allor, J., Mathes, P., Roberts, J. Cheatham, J., & Champlin, T. (2010). Comprehensive reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Findings from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 445–466. doi:10.1002/pits.20482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 200–208. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N., Thiemann-Bourque, K., Fleming, K., & Mathews, K. (2013). Predicting language outcomes for children learning augmentative and alternative communication: Child and environmental factors. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56, 1595–1612. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0102).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D., Flowers, C., & Wakeman, S. (2008). Facilitating participation in assessments and the general curriculum: Level of symbolic communication classification for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15, 137–151. doi:10.1080/09695940802164176.
   Google Scholar
• Browder, D., & Spooner, F. (2011). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browder, D., Wakeman, S., Spooner, F., Ahlgrin-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafiero, J. (2001). The effect of an augmentative communication intervention on the communication, behavior, and academic program of an adolescent with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 179–193. doi:10.1177/108835760101600306.
   Google Scholar
• Cameto, R., Bergland, F., Knokey, A., Nagle, K., Sanford, C., Kalb, S., … & Lauer, K. (2010). Teacher perspectives of school-level implementation of alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities. A Report from the National Study on Alternate Assessments [NCSER 2010-3007]. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20103007/pdf/20103007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C., Reichle, J., & Southard, K. (2000). High-probability requests and preferred items as a distractor: Increasing successful transitions in children with behavior problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Dessemontet, R., Bless, G., & Morin, D. (2012). Effects of inclusion on the academic achievement and adaptive behaviour of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 579–587. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01497.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Postal, V., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in two preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynamic Learning Maps (2012). DLM Member States Monthly Call: November 13, 2012. Lawrence, KS: Center for Educational Evaluation and Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Dynamic Learning Maps (2013). First contact survey. Lawrence, KS: Center for Educational Evaluation and Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. (2013). Who are students with significant cognitive disabilities? Lawrence, KS: Center for Educational Evaluation and Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., Hanser, G., Hatch, P., & Sanders, E. (2009). Research-based practices for creating access to the general curriculum in reading and literacy for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2009/Research_Based_Practices_Reading_2009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., Koppenhaver, D., Yoder, D., and Nance, J. (1997). Integrated communication and literacy instruction for a child with multiple disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 142–150. doi:10.1177/108835769701200302.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, A., & Bondy, L. (2001). The picture exchange communication system. Behavior Modification, 25, 725–744. doi:10.1177/0145445501255004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hild, U., Hey, C., Baumann, U., Montgomery, J., Euler, H., & Neumann, K. (2008). High prevalence of hearing disorders at the Special Olympics indicate need to screen persons with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 520–528. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01059.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004). Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/download/statute.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, J., Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H., Kleinert, J., & Thomas, M. (2011). Characteristics of and implications for students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards, Journal of Special Education, 45, 3–14, doi:10.1177/0022466909344223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinert, H., Towles-Reeves, E., Quenemoen, R., Thurlow, M., Fluegge, L., Weseman, L., & Kerbel, A. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught. Exceptional Children, 81, 312–328. doi:10.1177/0014402914563697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoors, H., & Vervloed, M. (2003). Educational programming for deaf children with multiple disabilities. In M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education (pp. 82–94). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., Hendrix, M., & Williams, A. (2007). Toward evidence-based literacy interventions for children with severe and multiple disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 79–90. doi:10.1055/s-2007-967932.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meuwese-Jongejeugd, A., Vink, M., van Zanten, B., Verschuure, H., Eichhorn, E., Koopman, D., … & Evenhuis, H. (2006). Prevalence of hearing loss in 1598 adults with an intellectual disability: cross-sectional population based study. International Journal of Audiology, 45, 660–669. doi:10.1080/14992020600920812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, M.P., Tomblin, J.B., Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Connor, C.M., & Jerger, S. (2007). Current state of knowledge: Language and literacy of children with hearing impairment. Ear and Hearing, 28, 740–753. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318157f07f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Marková, I., Moodie, E., Scott, J., & Boa, S. (1995). Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: Demographic survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 26–36. doi:10.1080/07434619512331277119.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., Dettmer, G., Euler, H., Giebel, A., Gross, M., Herer, G., … & Montgomery, J. (2006). Auditory status of persons with intellectual disability at the German Special Olympic Games. International Journal of Audiology, 45, 83–90. doi:10.1080/14992020500376891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics (2013). Qualtrics [Computer software]. Provo, UT: Qualtrics Retrieved from http://www.qualtrics.com.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.A., & Sevcik, R. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 281–285. doi:10.1080/07434619312331276701.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.A., & Sevcik, R. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R., Cheslock, M., & Barton, A. (2006). The system for augmenting language: AAC and emerging language intervention. In McCauley R.J., & Fey M.E. (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 123–147). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, J. (2012). An enriched writers’ workshop for beginning writers with developmental disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 1–35. doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e318272609b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towles-Reeves, E., Kearns, J., Flowers, C., Hart, L., Kerbel, A., Kleinert, H., … & Thurlow, M. (2012). Learner characteristics inventory project report (A product of the NCSC validity evaluation). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.ncscpartners.org/media/default/pdfs/lci-project-report-08-21-12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Towles-Reeves, E., Kearns, J., Kleinert, H., & Kleinert, J. (2009). An analysis of the learning characteristics of students taking alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. Journal of Special Education, 42, 241–254. doi:10.1177/0022466907313451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trief, E., Cascella, P., & Bruce, S. (2013). A field study of a standardized symbol system for learners who are visually impaired and have multiple disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 107, 180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., Alborz, A., & Gayle, V. (2008). Predictors of academic attainments of young people with Down’s syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 380–392. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.01038.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (2005). Alternate achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/altguidance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, P.L., Seligman-Wine, J., Lebel, T., Arzi, N., & Yalon Chamovitz, S. (2005). A demographic survey of children and adolescents with complex communication needs in Israel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 56–66. doi:10.1080/07434610412331272910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70185/1/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, S., & Moeller, M.P. (2007). Red flags for disabilities in children who are deaf/hard of hearing. The ASHA Leader, 12, 8–29. doi:10.1044/leader.FTR3.12012007.8.
   Google Scholar
• Worah, S. (2011). A survey of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) services in Connecticut. State Education Resource Center. Retrieved from http://ctserc.org/aacsurvey/.
   Google Scholar