2,543
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A meta-synthesis of team members’ voices: what we need and what we do to support students who use AAC

&
Pages 175-186 | Received 02 Jan 2016, Accepted 08 Jul 2016, Published online: 09 Aug 2016

References

  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Augmentative and alternative communication: Knowledge and skills for service delivery. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/html/KS2002-00067.html#sec1.1.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: position statement. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/policy/PS2005-00113.htm#sec1.1.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Information for AAC users. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/InfoAACUsers.htm.
  • Bailey, R.L., Parette Jr., H.P., Stoner, J.B., Angell, M.E., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/006).
  • *Bailey, R.L., Stoner, J.B., Parette, H., & Angell, M.E. (2006). AAC team perceptions: Augmentative and alternative communication device use. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 139–154.
  • Barbour, R.S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115–1117.
  • Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high‐technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47, 115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x.
  • Beukelman, D.R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Binger, C., Ball, L., Dietz, A., Kent-Walsh, J., Lasker, J., Lund, S., … & Quach, W. (2012). Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 278–288. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.716079.
  • Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207. doi:10.1177/001440290507100205.
  • Brown, C.P., & Lan, Yi-Chin. (2015). A qualitative metasynthesis comparing U.S. teachers’ conceptions of school readiness to and after the implementation of NCLB. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.012.
  • Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 359–380). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • *Crisp, C., Draucker, C.B., & Ellett, M.L.C. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to children’s use of speech‐generating devices: A descriptive qualitative study of mothers’ perspectives. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 19, 229–237. doi:10.1111/jspn.12074.
  • Erwin, E.J., Brotherson, M.J., & Summers, J.A. (2011). Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 186–200, doi:10.1177/1053815111425493.
  • *Finke, E.H., McNaughton, D.B., & Drager, K.D.R. (2009). “All children can and should have the opportunity to learn”: General education teachers’ perspectives on including children with autism spectrum disorder who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 110–122. doi:10.1080/07434610902886206.
  • Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., & Worthen, B.R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Friend, M. & Cook, L. (2010). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school Professionals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., & Wrenn, M. (1997). Promoting interactive partnerships in inclusive educational settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 127–137. doi:10.1177/154079699702200301.
  • Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., & Doering, K. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69, 315–332. doi:10.1177/001440290306900304.
  • Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Müller, E., & Goetz, L. (2002). Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 20–35. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.20.35.
  • *Kent-Walsh, J., & Light, J. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 104–124. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112043.
  • Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K.A., Malani, M.D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 120 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
  • Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013). Putting people first: Re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 299–309. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.848935.
  • Light, R.J., & Pillemer, D.B. (1984) Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • *Lund, S.K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III–Contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 323–335. doi:10.1080/02656730701189123.
  • *McCord, M.S., & Soto, G. (2004). Perceptions of AAC: An ethnographic investigation of Mexican-American families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 209–227. doi:10.1080/07434610400005648.
  • *McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M.B., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55. doi:10.1080/07434610701421007.
  • Major, C.H., & Savin-Baden, M. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Rubin, K.H., Bukowski, W.M. & Laursen, B. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & McDuffie, K.A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416. doi:10.1177/001440290707300401.
  • Smith, H., Foxx, J.R.E., & Trayner, P. (2015). The lived experiences of individuals with Tourette syndrome or tic disorders: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 609–634.
  • Snell, M.E., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B.T., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., … & Sevcik, R. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-115-5.364.
  • *Soto, G., Müller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001a). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 62–72. doi:10.1080/aac.17.2.62.72.
  • Soto, G., Müller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001b). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 51–56. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2001/005).
  • Stoner, J.B., Angell, M.E., & Bailey, R.L. (2010). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive educational settings: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 122–135. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481092.
  • Subihi, A.S. (2013). Saudi special education student teachers’ knowledge of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). International Journal of Special Education, 28, 93–103.
  • Indicates reviewed study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.