Core vocabulary in written personal narratives of school-age children

References

• Banajee, M., Dicarlo, C., & Buras Stricklin, S. (2003). Core vocabulary determination for toddlers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 67–73. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112034.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D.R., Jones, R.S., & Rowan, M. (1989). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 171–185. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275883.
   Google Scholar
• Boenisch, J., & Soto, G. (2015). The oral core vocabulary of typically developing English speaking school-aged children: Implications for AAC practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 77–84. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.1001521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokova, I. (2014, August 28). UNESCO World Literacy Day. Retrieved from http://www.americaspromise.org/news/unesco-world-literacy-day.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J.S., & Herwantoro, S. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools: Immigration and the No Child Left Behind Act. Urban Institute (NJ1).
   Google Scholar
• Clendon, S.A., & Erickson, K.A. (2008). The vocabulary of beginning writers: Implications for children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 281–293. doi:10.1080/07434610802463999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clendon, S.A., Sturm, J.M., & Cali, K.S. (2013). Vocabulary use across genres: Implications for students with complex communication needs. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 61–72. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2012/10-0112).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, V., Dockrell, J.E. Walter, K., & Critten, S. (2012). Predicting the quality of composition and written language bursts from oral language, spelling, and handwriting skills in children with and without specific language impairment. Written Communication, 29, 278–302. doi:10.1177/0741088312451109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crestani, C-A. M., Clendon, S.A., & Hemsley, B. (2010). Words needed for sharing a story:Implications for vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 35, 268–278. doi:10.3109/13668250.2010.513966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curenton, S.M., & Justice, L.M. (2004). African American and Caucasian preschoolers’ use of decontextualized language: Literate language features in oral narratives. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 240–253. doi:0161-1461/04/3503-0240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J.E., Ricketts, J., Charman, T., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Exploring writing products in students with language impairments and autism spectrum disorders. Learning and Instruction, 32, 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, K.A., Light, J.C., & Paige, T.K. (2001). Enhancing vocabulary selection for preschoolers who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 881–894. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for nonspeaking preschool children based on developmental and environmental language sources. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 41–56. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276033.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. (1975). An examination of the writing process of seven-year-old children. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, S.R., Roberts, J.E., Nelson, L., Zeisel, S., & Fannin, D.K. (2010). Preschool predictors of narrative writing skills in elementary school children. American Psychological Association School Psychology Quarterly, 25(1), 1. doi:10.1037/a001888329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J.F., & Merves, J.S. (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienemann, T.O., Graham, S., Leader-Janssen, B., & Reid, R. (2006). Improving the writing performance of struggling writers in the second grade. Journal of Special Education, 40, 66–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, J.S., & Beukelman, D.R. (1989). Vocabulary requirements for writing activities for the academically mainstreamed student with disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 183–191. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275186.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.F., & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT), English & Spanish (Version 12) [Computer software]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin – Madison, Waisman Center, Language Analysis Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., & McArdle, P. (2011). Reflections on the need for continued research on writing. Reading and Writing, 24, 121–132. doi:10.1007/s11145-101-9267-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineo, B.A., Peischl, D., & Pennington, C. (2008). Moving targets: The effect of animation on identification of action word representations. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 24, 162–173. doi:10.1080/07434610802109915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, C., Furrow, D., Chiasson, L., & Patriquin, M. (1994). Developmental relationships between production and comprehension of mental terms. First Language, 14, 1–17. doi:10.1177/014272379401404001.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D.R., Mirenda, P., Beukelman, D.R., & Yorkston, K.M. (1993). Vocabulary selection for augmentative communication systems: A comparison of three techniques. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2, 19–30. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275883.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., & Fisher, R. (2010). Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 1–3. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01428.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2005). Learning to write. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 233–273). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, B., & Bashir, A. (2004). Developmental variations in writing composition skills. In C.A., Stone, E.R. Silliman, B.J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy development and disorders (pp. 559–582). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Grove, N. (1996). Input/output asymmetries – Implications for language development in AAC. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vancouver, Canada, August 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, M.R., Stoner, J.B., & Angell, M.E. (2013). Teaching conceptually referenced core vocabulary for initial augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 322–333. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.848932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm, J.M., & Clendon, S.A. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication, language, and literacy: Fostering the relationship. Topics in Language Disorders, 24, 76–91. doi:10.1097/00011363-200401000-00008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., & Nippold, M.A. (2012). Narrative writing in children and adolescents: Examining the literate lexicon. Language Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 43, 2–13. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0099).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281271.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.E., Hart, S.A., Mikolajewski, A.J., & Schatschneider, C. (2013). An update on the Florida state twin registry. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 471–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J.J., & Wilkinson, K.M. (2015). Building evidence-based practice in AAC display design for young children: Current practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 124–136. doi:10.31109/07434618.2015.1035798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trembath, D., Balandin, S., & Togher, L. (2007). Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 291–301. doi:10.1080/13668250701689298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G.A. (2007). Research in writing instruction: What we know and what we need to know. In M. Pressley, A. Billman, K. Perry, K. Refitt, & J.M. Reynolds (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 129–156). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1256–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIATT-II). London: Pearson:Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, J.C., Sevcik, R.A., Morris, R.D., Lovett, M.D., & Wolf, W. (2007). The relationship among receptive and expressive vocabulary, listening comprehension, pre-reading skills,word identification skills, and reading comprehension by children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1093–1109. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/076).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkowski, D., & Baker, B. (2012). Addressing the content vocabulary with core: Theory and practice for nonliterate or emerging literate students. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 74–81. doi:10.1044/aac21.3.1-ce.
   Google Scholar