A systematic review of Functional Communication Training (FCT) interventions involving augmentative and alternative communication in school settings

References

• Andzik, N.R., Cannella-Malone, H.I., & Sigafoos, J. 2016. Practitioner-implemented functional communication training: A review of the literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41, 79–89. doi:10.1177/1540796916633874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (Eds.). 2013. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, F., Anderson, J., & De Pry, R. L. (Eds.). 2015. Individualized positive behavior supports: A standards-based guide to school and community settings. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• *Buckley, S.D., & Newchok, D.K. 2005. Differential impact of response effort within a response chain on use of mands in a student with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 77–85. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E.G., & Durand, V.M. 1985. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Casey, S.D., & Merical, C.L. 2006. The use of functional communication training without additional treatment procedures in an inclusive school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 46–54. doi:10.1177/019874290603200102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (Eds.). 2009. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• *Davis, D.H., Fredrick, L.D., Alberto, P.A., & Gama, R. 2012. Functional communication training without extinction using concurrent schedules of differing magnitudes of reinforcement in classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 162–172. doi:10.1177/1098300711429597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Day, R., Rea, J., Schussler, N., Larsen, S., & Johnson, W. 1988. A functionally based approach to the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Behavior Modification, 12, 565–589. doi:10.1177/01454455880124005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Donovan, A.L. 2003. Functional communication training in young deaf children: Effects of reinforcement magnitude on requesting and time on task (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (UMI No. 3087747)
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, G., & Carr, E.G. 2007. Positive behavior support and developmental disabilities: A summary and analysis of research. In S.L., Odom, R.H., Horner, M., Snell, J. & Blacher, (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 469–482). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• *Durand, V.M. 1993. Functional communication training using assistive devices: Effects on challenging behavior and affect. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 168–176. doi:10.1177/01454455880124005
   Google Scholar
• *Durand, V.M. 1999. Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 247–267. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, V.M., & Carr, E.G. 1991. Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: Maintenance and application in new settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 251–264. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, V.M., & Crimmins, D. 1992. The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS). Topeka, KS: Monaco & Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, V.M., & Moskowitz, L. 2015. Functional communication training: Thirty years of treating challenging behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 116–126. doi:10.1177/0271121415569509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dwyer, K., Rozewski, D., & Simonsen, B. 2012. A comparison of function-based replacement behaviors for escape-motivated students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 115–125. doi:10.1177/1063426610387432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Flynn, S.D., & Lo, Y. 2016. Teacher implementation of trial-based functional analysis and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior for students with challenging behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 1–31. doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9231-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Franco, J.H., Lang, R.L., O’reilly, M.F., Chan, J.M., Sigafoos, J., & Rispoli, M. 2009. Functional analysis and treatment of inappropriate vocalizations using a speech-generating device for a child with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 146–155. doi:10.1177/1088357609338380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, A.E., & Bambara, L.M. 2012. Individualized positive behavior supports in school settings: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 271–286. doi:10.1177/1088357609338380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrower, J., & Dunlap, G. 2001. Including children with autism in general education classrooms: A review of effective strategies. Behavior Modification, 25, 762–785. doi:10.1177/0145445501255006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A.K., Ganz, J., Parker, R., Burke, M., & Ninci, J. 2015. A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2, 155–166. doi:10.1007/s40489-014-0044-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hetzroni, O.E., & Roth, T. 2003. Effects of a positive support approach to enhance communicative behaviors of children with mental retardation who have challenging behaviors. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Holburn, S. 2002. How science can evaluate and enhance person-centered planning. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 27, 250–260. doi:10.2511/rpsd.27.4.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Horner, R.H., Sprague, J.R., O’Brien, M., & Heathfield, L.T. 1990. The role of response efficiency in the reduction of problem behaviors through functional equivalence training: A case study. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 15, 91–97. doi:10.1177/154079699001500205
   Google Scholar
• *Hunt, S.T. 1999. Using functional communication training to alleviate problem behaviors in young children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company (UMI No. 9839546).
   Google Scholar
• Iwata, B.A., Dorsey, M.F., Slifer, K.J., Bauman, K.E., & Richman, G.S. 1982. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20. doi:10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kelley, M.E., Lerman, D.C., & Van Camp, C.M. 2002. The effects of competing reinforcement schedules on the acquisition of functional communication. The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 59–63. doi:10.1901/jaba.2002.35-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinert, H., Towles-Reeves, E., Quenemoen, R., Thurlow, M., Fluegge, L., Weseman, L., & Kerbel, A. 2015. Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81, 312–328. doi:10.1177/0014402914563697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T.K., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R.H., Levin, J.R., Odom, S.L., Rindskopf, D.M., & Shadish, W.R. 2010. Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearninghouse website: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510743.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, P.F., Boelter, E.W., Jarmolowicz, D.P., Chin, M.D., & Hagopian, L.P. 2011. An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2935–2942. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledford, J.R., Lane, J.D., & Gast, D.L. 2018. Dependent variables, measurement, and reliability. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 97–103). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, B.P., & Kennedy, C.H. 2014. Assessment and treatment of challenging behaviour for individuals with intellectual disability: A research review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27, 187–199. doi:10.1111/jar.12089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggin, D., Briesch, A., & Chafouleas, S.M. 2013. An application of the What Works Clearinghouse standards for evaluation single-subject research: Synthesis of the self-management literature base. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 44–58. doi:10.1177/0741932511435176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancil, G.R. 2006. Functional communication training: A review of literature related to children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. 1997. Supporting individuals with challenging behavior through functional communication training and AAC: Research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 207–225. doi:10.1080/07434619712331278048
   Google Scholar
• Moeyaert, M., Zimmerman, K.N., & Ledford, J.R. 2018. Synthesis and meta-analysis of single case research. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 393–416). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morningstar, M.E., Allcock, H.C., White, J.M., Taub, D., Kurth, J.A., Gonsier-Gerdin, J., … Jorgensen, C.M. 2016. Inclusive education national research advocacy agenda: A call to action. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41, 209–215. doi:10.1177/1540796916650975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Northup, J., Wacker, D.P., Berg, W.K., Kelly, L., Sasso, G., & DeRaad, A. 1994. The treatment of severe behavior problems in school settings using a technical assistance model. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 33–47. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, R.E., Albin, R.W., Storey, K., Horner, R.H., & Sprague, J.R. 2015. Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• *O’Neill, R.E., & Sweetland-Baker, M. 2001. Brief report: An assessment of stimulus generalization and contingency effects in functional communication training with two students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 235–240. doi:10.1023/A:1010711518182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., & Vannest, K.J. 2009. An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs). Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., Vannest, K.J., & Brown, L. 2009. The improvement rate difference for single case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150. doi:10.1177/001440290907500201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., Vannest, K.J., Davis, J.L., & Sauber, S.B. 2011. Combining non-overlap and trend for single case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 24, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   Google Scholar
• *Peck Peterson, S.M., Caniglia, C., Royster, A.J., Macfarlane, E., Plowman, K., Baird, S.J., & Wu, N. 2005. Blending functional communication training and choice making to improve task engagement and decrease problem behavior. Educational Psychology, 25, 257–274. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301193
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Chen, M. 2016. Challenging behavior and communicative alternatives. In R. A. Sevcik, & M. Romski (Eds.), Communication interventions for individuals with severe disabilities: Exploring research challenges and opportunities (pp. 35–74). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Wacker, D.P. 2017. Functional communication training for problem behavior. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G. 1987. The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33. doi:10.1177/074193258700800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., Brasil, I.C., Illingworth, D.A., White, K.D., Galindo, R., Nagler, E.D., & Rindskopf, D.M. 2009. Using UnGraph to extract data from image files: Verification of reliability and validity. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 177–183. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J. 2000. Communication development and aberrant behavior in children with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 168–176.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, M.E., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B.T., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., … Sevcik, R. 2010. Twenty years of communication intervention research for individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-115-5.364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snell, M.E., Chen, L., & Hoover, K. 2006. Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research 1997-2003. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 203–214. doi:10.1177/154079690603100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Hagan-Burke, S. 2000. Overview of the functional behavioral assessment process. Exceptionality, 8, 149–160. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX0803_2
   Google Scholar
• Tiger, J.H., Hanley, G.P., & Bruzek, J. 2008. Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 16–23. doi:10.1007/BF03391716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biosoft. 2004. UnGraph for Windows (Version 5.0) [Computer software]. Cambridge, UK: Biosoft.
   Google Scholar
• Vannest, K.J., & Ninci, J. 2015. Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93, 403–411. doi:10.1002/jcad.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K.J., Parker, R.I., & Gonen, O. 2011. Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis. (Version 1.0) [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Available from singlecaseresearch.org
   Google Scholar
• von der Embse, N., Brown, A., & Fortain, J. 2011. Facilitating inclusion by reducing problem behaviors for students with autism spectrum disorders. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47, 22–30. doi:10.1177/1053451211406545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, V.L., Chung, Y., & Bonnet, L.K. 2017. Function-based intervention in inclusive school settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1098300717718350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, V.L., & Snell, M.E. 2013. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 117–131. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.785020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar