The effects of literacy interventions on single-word reading for individuals who use aided AAC: a systematic review

References

• Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Browder, D., & Wood, L. (2014). Effects of systematic instruction and an augmentative communication device on phonics skills acquisition for students with moderate intellectual disability who are nonverbal. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 517–532. Retrieved from http://daddcec.org/Publications/ETADDJournal.aspx
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ainsworth, M.K. (2013). Effectiveness of the ALL Curriculum to teach basic literacy skills to groups of students with severe disabilities and complex communication needs (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University).
   Google Scholar
• Barbetta, P.M., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 111–119. doi:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R.M., Saunders, K.J., & Brady, N.C. (2012). Reading instruction for children who use AAC: Considerations in the pursuit of generalizable results. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 160–170. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D.R. (2016). Precision intervention research for adults with complex communication needs resulting from acquired medical conditions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 233–235. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1252947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Spooner, F., Mims, P.J., & Baker, J.N. (2009). Using Time Delay to Teach Literacy to Students with Severe Developmental Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364. doi:10.1177/001440290907500305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D.M., Courtade-Little, G., Wakeman, S., & Rickelman, R.J. (2006). From sight words to emergent literacy. In D. Browder & F. Spooner (Eds.), Teaching language arts, math and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities (pp. 63–91). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Browder, D.M., Wakeman, S.Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzinexya, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408. doi:10.1177/001440290607200401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D., & Xin, Y. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, 130–153. doi:10.1177/002246699803200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E.J., & Tarver, S.G. (2010). Direct instruction reading (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• *Caron, J. (2016). Effects of adapted instruction on the acquisition of letter-sound correspondences and sight words by pre-adolescent/adolescent learners with complex communication needs and autism spectrum disorders. (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University).
   Google Scholar
• Caron, J., Holyfield, C., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2017). Reading and writing intervention for adults with complex communication needs. Presentation to ISAAC-Norway.
   Google Scholar
• *Coleman-Martin, M.B., Heller, K.W., Cihak, D.F., & Irvine, K.L. (2005). Using computer-assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 80–90. doi:10.1177/10883576050200020401
   Google Scholar
• *Crowley, K., McLaughlin, T., & Kahn, R. (2013). Using direct instruction flashcards and reading racetracks to improve sight word recognition of two elementary students with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 297–311. doi:10.1007/s10882-012-9307-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N., & Carlisle, J. (2011). The development of comprehension. In M. Kamil, P. Pearson, E. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol.4, pp. 199–228). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Durlak, J.A., & Du Pre, E.P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, K.A., Clendon, S.A., Cunningham, J.W., Spadorcia, S., Koppenhaver, D.A., Sturm, J., & Yoder, D.E. (2008). Automatic word recognition: The validity of a universally accessible assessment task. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 64–75. doi:10.1080/07434610701437227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EQUATOR Network. (2017). Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research. Retrieved from http://www.equator-network.org
   Google Scholar
• *Fallon, K.A., Light, J., McNaughton, D., Drager, K., & Hammer, C. (2004). The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1424–1439. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/106)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, B.E., & Wolter, J. (2010). Literacy intervention for transition-aged youth: What is and what could be. In D. McNaughton & D. Beukelman (Eds.), Transition strategies for adolescents and young adults who use AAC (pp. 35–68). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, K., Mirenda, P., & Phillips, G. (1996). Comparison of five symbol-assessment protocols with non-disabled preschoolers and learners with severe cognitive intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 63–77. doi:10.1080/07434619612331277518
   Google Scholar
• *Heller, K.W., Fredrick, L.D., Tumlin, J., & Brineman, D.G. (2002). Teaching decoding for generalization using the nonverbal reading approach. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 19–35. doi:10.1023/A:1013559612238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hetzroni, O.E., & Shalem, U. (2005). From logos to orthographic symbols: A multilevel fading computer program for teaching nonverbal children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 201–212. doi:10.1177/10883576050200040201
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J.P., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 4). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Cupples, L. (2004). Assessment of phonemic awareness and word reading skills of people with complex communication needs. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 437. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/035)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S.S., Davenport, L., & Kanarowski, B. (2009). Teaching sound letter correspondence and consonant- vowel-consonant combinations to young children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 123–125. doi:10.1080/07434610902921409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K.A., Malani, M.D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D.A., & Erickson, K.A. (2003). Natural emergent literacy supports for preschoolers with autism and severe communication impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 283–292. doi:10.1097/00011363-200310000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013). Literacy intervention for individuals with complex communication needs. In D.R. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs, (4th ed., pp. 309–351). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., McNaughton, D., Weyer, M., & Karg, L. (2008). Evidence-based literacy instruction for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A case study of a student with multiple disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 120–132. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1079126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machalicek, W., Sanford, A., Lang, R., Rispoli, M., Molfenter, N., & Mbeseha, M.K. (2010). Literacy interventions for students with physical and developmental disabilities who use aided AAC devices: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 219–240. doi:10.1007/s10882-009-9175-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Tawney, J. (1993). Comparison of two spelling instruction techniques for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 72–82. doi:10.1080/07434619312331276461
   Google Scholar
• Millar, D.C., Light, J.C., & Schlosser, R.W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D.G. & The Prisma Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta- analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, 1–6. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., Vannest, K.J., Davis, J.L., & Sauber, S.B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. 1985. Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, S., Taylor, R., & Ramasamy, R. (2014). Single subject research: Applications in education and clinical settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138–150. doi:10.1080/17489530701560831
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research methodology. And Validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33. doi:10.1177/074193258700800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D.L., & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, J.E. (2011). Sight word instruction for students with autism: An evaluation of the evidence base. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1411–1422. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1165-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Swinehart-Jones, D., & Heller, K.W. (2009). Teaching students with severe speech and physical impairments a decoding strategy using internal speech and motoric indicators. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 131–144. doi:10.1177/0022466908314945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Truxler, J., & O’Keefe, B. (2007). The effects of phonological awareness instruction on beginning word recognition and spelling. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 164–176. doi:10.1080/07434610601151803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Cooijmans, M., Didden, R., Lancioni, G.E., O’Reilly, M.F., … Green, V.A. (2015). An iPad©-based intervention for teaching picture and word matching to a student with ASD and severe communication impairment. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 67–78. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9401-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M.C., & Siegel, L.S. (1995). Phonological recoding and phoneme awareness in early literacy: A developmental approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 854. doi:10.2307/748201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K.J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single‐case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. doi:10.1002/jcad.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zascavage, V.T., & Keefe, C.H. (2004). Students with severe speech and physical impairments: Opportunity barriers to literacy. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 223–234. doi:10.1177/1088357604019004040
   Google Scholar