Exploring participation experiences of youth who use AAC in social media settings: impact of an e-mentoring intervention

References

• Adair, B., Ullenhag, A., Keen, D., Granlund, M., & Imms, C. (2015). The effect of interventions aimed at improving participation outcomes for children with disabilities: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 57, 1093–1104. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahola Kohut, S., Stinson, J.N., Ruskin, D., Forgeron, P., Harris, L., van Wyk, M., … Campbell, F. (2016). iPeer2Peer program: A pilot feasibility study in adolescents with chronic pain. Pain, 157, 1146–1155. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016, February 18). 81460DO002_201415 Household use of information technology, Australia, 2014-2015 Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/8146.02014-15?OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, D., & Gorter, J. W. (2015, July 31). GMFCS-E&R self report questionnaire: For young people aged 12- 18 years. Retrieved from http://motorgrowth.canchild.ca/en/GMFCS/resources/GMFCS_self_12-18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., King, G., Mishra, L., & Missiuna, C. (2016). An integrated model of social environment and social context for pediatric rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation, 38, 1204–1215. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1076070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., King, G., Vane, F., Pinto, M., & Raghavendra, P. (2017). Exploring validation of a graphic symbol questionnaire to measure participation experiences of youth in activity settings. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 33, 97–109. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2017.13078741307874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D.R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210– 230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, K., & Light, J. (2000). Use of electronic communication to develop mentor-protégé relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: Pilot study. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 16, 227–238. doi: d10.1080/07434610012331279084
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, D., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 57–91. doi: 10.1177/1529100611414806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, A., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Rösblad, B., Beckung, E., Arner, M., Ohrvall, A., & Rosenbaum, P. (2006). The manual ability classification system (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 48, 549–554. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., & Kopenhaver, D. (2014). AGOSCI Level 2 literacy intensive. Literacy in AAC: Assessments to guide instruction. Whole to part reading assessment. Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Garringer, M., Kupersmidt, J., Rhodes, J., Stelter, R., & Tai, T. (2015, October 2). Elements of effective practice for mentoring: Research-informed and practitioner-approved best practices for creating and sustaining impactful mentoring relationships and strong program services. Retrieved from http://www.mentoring.org/images/uploads/Final_Elements_Publication_Fourth.pdf.program services.
   Google Scholar
• Gliner, J., Morgan, G., & Leech, N. (2017). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, E., Raghavendra, P., Newman, L., Wood, D., & Connell, T. (2014). Learning to use the Internet and online social media: What is the effectiveness of home-based intervention for youth with complex communication needs?. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 141–157. doi: 10.1177/0265659013518565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund, M. (2013). Participation: Challenges in conceptualization, measurement and intervention. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 470–473. doi: 10.1111/cch.12080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., Arvidsson, P., Niia, A., Björck-Åkesson, E., Simeonsson, R., Maxwell, G., … Pless, M. (2012). Differentiating activity and participation of children and youth with disability in Sweden: A third qualifier in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for Children and Youth?. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, S84–S96. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31823d5376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A.D., McGregor, J.C., Perencevich, E.N., Furuno, J.P., Zhu, J., Peterson, D.E., & Finkelstein, J. (2006). The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 16–23. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, E. (2005). Recall bias can be a threat to retrospective and prospective research designs. The Internet Journal of Epidemiology, 3, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4, 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.10836101.1999.tb00106.x
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S., & Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In D. Tannen, H. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, B., Palmer, S., Dann, S., & Balandin, S. (2018). Using Twitter to access the human right of communication for people who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 20, 50–58. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1413137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidecker, M.A.R.Y.J.O.C.O.O.L.E.Y., Paneth, N.I.G.E.L., Rosenbaum, P.E.T.E.R.L., Kent, R.A.Y.M.O.N.D.D., Lillie, J.A.N.E.T., Eulenberg, J.O.H.N.B., … Taylor, K.A.R.A. (2011). Developing and validating the communication function classification system for individuals with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53, 704–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., & Wilkins, D.P. (1999). Slipping through the timestream: Social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. In D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan & M. Maxwell (Eds.), Constructing (in)competence (pp. 49–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogsteen, L., & Woodgate, R.L. (2010). Can I play? A concept analysis of participation in children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 30, 325–339. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2010.481661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynan, A., Goldbart, J., & Murray, J. (2015). A grounded theory of Internet and social media use by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability & Rehabilitation, 37, 1559–1575. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1056387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, D., & Czaja, S. (2016). Recruitment and Retention: Two of the most important, yet challenging, tasks in behavioral intervention research. In L. Gitlin & S. Czaja (Eds.), Behavioral intervention research: Designing, evaluating, and implementing. New York, NY
   Google Scholar
• Johns, J. (2012). Basic Reading Inventory (11th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Karcher, M. (2014). Cross-age peer mentoring. In D. DuBois & M. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (2nd ed., pp. 233–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Batorowicz, B., Rigby, P., McMain-Klein, M., Thompson, L., & Pinto, M. (2014). Development of a measure to assess youth self-reported experiences of activity settings (SEAS). International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61, 44–66. doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2014.878542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Batorowicz, B., Rigby, P., Pinto, M., Thompson, L., & Goh, F. (2014). The leisure activity settings and experiences of youth with severe disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 259–269. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2013.799244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Rigby, P., & Batorowicz, B. (2013). Conceptualizing participation in context for children and youth with disabilities: An activity setting perspective. Disability & Rehabilitation, 35, 1578–1585. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.748836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Rigby, P., Batorowicz, B., McMain-Klein, M., Petrenchik, T., Thompson, L., & Gibson, M. (2014). Development of a direct observation measure of environmental qualities of activity settings. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 56, 763–769. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T., & Levin, J. (2014). Single-Case Intervention Research: Methodological and Statistical Advances. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 31, 85–96. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2015.1036458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., & Livingston, M. (2008). Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50, 744–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03089.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Newman, L., Grace, E., & Wood, D. (2013). “I could never do that before”: Effectiveness of a tailored Internet support intervention to increase the social participation of youth with disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 552–561. doi: 10.1111/cch.12048doi:
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Newman, L., Wood, D., Grace, E., & Hutchinson, C. (2015). “It’s helped me connect with more friends”: Supporting social media use to enhance the social networks of young people with disabilities living in rural South Australia Adelaide. Retrieved from Research Report to the National Disability Research and Development Agenda https://www.dss.gov.au/disability-and-carers/facilitating-social-participation-of-children-and-young-people-with-disabilities-in-rural-and-regional-australia-using-mobile-and-computer-based-technologies
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Virgo, R., Olsson, C., Connell, T., & Lane, A. (2011). Activity participation of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities and typically-developing peers. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14, 145–155. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2011.568994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., Letourneau, N., Masuda, J., Anderson, S., & McGhan, S. (2013). Impacts of online peer support for children with asthma and allergies: "It just helps you every time you can't breathe well.". Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 28, 439–452. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2013.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, J., A., Kohut, S., Forgeron, P., Amaria, K., Bell, M., Kaufman, M., …., Spiegel L, (2016). The iPeer2Peer program: A pilot randomized controlled trial in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology, 14, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12969-016-0108-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., & Rönnberg, J. (2010). A qualitative analysis of email interactions of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 26, 255–266. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.528796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumanickam, A., Raghavendra, P., & Olsson, C. (2011). Participation and social networks of school-age children with complex communication needs: A descriptive study. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 27, 195–204. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.610818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar