Professionals’ decision-making in recommending communication aids in the UK: competing considerations

References

• Barbour, R. (2008). Doing focus groups. London, UK: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (Eds.). (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D., Chung, Y., & Lever, S. (2010). What you might not find in a typical transition plan! Some important lessons from adults who rely on augmentative and alternative communication. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 32–40. doi:10.1044/aac19.2.32
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Murphy, Y., & Tönsing, K. (2017). Augmentative and alternative communication practices: A descriptive study of the perceptions of South African speech-language therapists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 189–200. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1375979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Quach, W., Lund, S., & McKelvey, M. (2012). AAC assessment and clinical decision-making: The impact of experience. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 148–159. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2012). Critical thinking in clinical practice: Improving the quality of judgments and decisions (3rd ed.). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44. doi:10.1080/10400435.2011.648717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. (2010). Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5, 209–222. doi:10.3109/17483101003718195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lund, S., Quach, W., Weissling, K., McKelvey, M., & Dietz, A. (2017). Assessment with children who need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): Clinical decisions of AAC specialists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48, 56–68. doi:10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Y., Murray, J., Moulam, L., Meredith, S., Goldbart, J., Smith, M., … Judge, S. (2019). Decision making in communication aid recommendations in the UK: Cultural and contextual influencers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadd, E., & Wilkinson, K. (2010). Qualitative analysis of decision making by speech-language pathologists in designing aided visual displays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 136–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, P., & Kelly, B. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability and Society, 24, 47–62. doi:10.1080/09687590802535410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication: A review of current issues. Paediatrics and Child Health, 19, 464–468. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2009.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2011). Emergence of working memory in children using aided communication. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5, 213–232. doi:10.1108/17549451111190623
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service. (2018). Service specifications for complex disability equipment: Communication aids. Retrieved from https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/npc-crg/group-d/d01/
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., Shepherd, T., Renzoni, A., Anderson, C., Barber, M., Kingsnorth, S., & Ward, K. (2015). Towards advancing knowledge translation of AAC outcomes research for children and youth with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 137–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1030038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 215–233. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1062553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk, K., Dada, S., & Tonsing, K. (2017). Influences on selection of assistive technology for young children in South Africa: Perspectives from rehabilitation professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1416500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar