Decision-making in communication aid recommendations in the UK: cultural and contextual influencers

References

• Anderson, K., Boisvert, M., Doneski-Nicol, J., Gutmann, M., Hall, N., Morelock, C., … Cohen, E. (2012). Tele-AAC resolution. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4, 79–82. doi:10.5195/ijt.2012.6106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angelo, D. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 37–47. doi:10.1080/07434610012331278894
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., & Shepherd, T. (2011). Teamwork in AAC: Examining clinical perceptions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 16–25. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.546809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (Eds.). (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D., Chung, Y., & Lever, S. (2010). What you might not find in a typical transition plan! Some important lessons from adults who rely on augmentative and alternative communication. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 32–40. doi:10.1044/aac19.2.32
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C., & Marvin, C.A. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 254–272. doi:10.1080/07434610310001598242
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Quach, W., Lund, S.K., & McKelvey, M. (2012). AAC assessment and clinical decision-making: The impact of experience. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 148–159. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbart, J., & Marshall, J. (2004). "Pushes and pulls" on the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 194–208. doi:10.1080/07434610400010960
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J. (2011). Two years on: Final report of the communication champion for children. https://www.rcslt.org/speechand
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99. doi:10.1080/07434610500483588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. (2010). Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5, 209–222. doi:10.3109/17483101003718195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matthews, R. (2001). A survey to identify therapists' high-tech AAC knowledge, application and training. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 64–69. doi:10.3109/13682820109177860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J., Lynch, Y., Meredith, S., Moulam, L., Goldbart, G., Smith, M., … Judge, S. (2019). Professionals’ decision making in recommending communication aids in the UK: Competing considerations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Service (NHS). (2018). Service specifications for complex disability equipment: Communication aids (specialised augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) services). Retrieved from www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/npc-crg/group-d/d01/
   Google Scholar
• Parette, P., VanBiervliet, A., & Hourcade, J. (1999). Family centered decision making in assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15, 45–55. doi:10.1177/016264340001500104
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., Shepherd, T., Renzoni, A., Anderson, C., Barber, M., Kingsnorth, S., & Ward, K. (2015). Towards advancing knowledge translation of AAC outcomes research for children and youth with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 137–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1030038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2018) Guidance of the provision of communication equipment and support in using that equipment. https://beta.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/guidance/2018/05/guidance-provision-communication-equipment-support-using-equipment/documents/00535995-pdf/00535995-pdf/govscot:document/
   Google Scholar
• Serpentine, E., Tarnai, B., Drager, K., & Finke, E. (2011). Decision making of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder concerning augmentative and alternative communication in Hungary. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 221–231. doi:10.1177/1525740109353938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Murray, J., von Tetzchner, S., & Langan, P. (2010). A tale of transitions: The challenges of integrating speech synthesis in aided communication. In J. Mullennix & S. Stern (Eds.), Computer synthesized speech technologies: Tools for aiding impairment (pp. 234–256). New York, USA: Medical Information Science Reference: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0-25 years. (2014). Statutory guidance for organisations which work with and support children an young people who have special educational needs or disabilities. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/398815/SEND_Code_of_Practice_January_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar