1,722
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Tutorial and Synthesis

Programing AAC just-in-time for beginning communicators: the process

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 309-318 | Received 27 Feb 2019, Accepted 23 Oct 2019, Published online: 02 Dec 2019

References

  • Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Deckner, D. F., & Romski, M. (2009). Joint engagement and the emergence of language in children with autism and Down syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 84–96. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0601-7
  • Allen, A., Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H. C., & Brock, K. (2017). The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 149–159. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1338752
  • Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
  • Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. Somerset, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Caron, J., Light, J., Davidoff, B. E., & Drager, K. D. (2017). Comparison of the effects of mobile technology AAC apps on programming visual scene displays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(4), 239–248. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1388836
  • Caron, J., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2016). Operational demands of AAC mobile technology applications on programming vocabulary and engagement during professional and child interactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(1), 12–24. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1126636
  • Carter, M., & Iacono, T. (2002). Professional judgments of the intentionality of communicative acts. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(3), 177–191. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281261
  • Drager, K. D., Light, J., Currall, J., Muttiah, N., Smith, V., Kreis, D., … Wiscount, J. (2017). AAC technologies with visual scene displays and just-in-time programming and symbolic communication turns expressed by students with severe disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44, 1–16. doi:10.3109/13668250.2017.1326585
  • Drager, K. D., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 112–125. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012)
  • Grove, N., Bunning, K., Porter, J., & Olsson, C. (1999). See what I mean: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3), 190–203. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00076.x
  • Holland, A. L. (1975). Language therapy for children: Some thoughts on context and content. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40(4), 514–523. doi:10.1044/jshd.4004.514
  • Holyfield, C., Brooks, S., & Schluterman, A. (2019). Comparative effects of high-tech visual scene displays and low-tech isolated picture symbols on engagement from students with multiple disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 693–702. doi:10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-0007
  • Holyfield, C., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., & Gormley, J. (2018). Effect of AAC partner training using video on peers’ interpretation of the behaviors of presymbolic middle-schoolers with multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 301–310. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1508306
  • Holyfield, C., Caron, J. G., Drager, K., & Light, J. (2019). Effect of mobile technology featuring visual scene displays and just-in-time programming on communication turns by preadolescent and adolescent beginning communicators. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 201–211. doi:10.1080/17549507.2018.1441440
  • Holyfield, C., Drager, K., Light, J., & Caron, J. G. (2017). Typical toddlers' participation in “Just-in-Time” programming of vocabulary for visual scene display augmentative and alternative communication apps on mobile technology: A descriptive study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(3), 737–749. doi:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-15-0197
  • Iacono, T., Carter, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(2), 102–114. doi:10.1080/07434619812331278246
  • Johnston, S. S., Reichle, J., & Evans, J. (2004). Supporting augmentative and alternative communication use by beginning communicators with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1), 20–30. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/004)
  • Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Caron, J. (2019). New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 26–41. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1557251
  • Light, J., Drager, K., & Currall, J. (2012). November). Effects of AAC technologies with “Just in Time” programming. Presentation at America Speech-Language Hearing Association Convention in Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from https://aac.psu.edu/?p=1281
  • Light, J., Parsons, A., Drager, K., (2002). “There's more to life than cookies”: Developing interactions for social closeness with beginning communicators who require augmentative and alternative communication. In Reichle, J., Beukelman, D., & Light, J. (Eds.). Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 187–218). Baltimore, MD: Paul. H. Brookes.
  • Light, J., Wilkinson, K., Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D., & Fager, S. (2018, July). Designing effective AAC interface displays for individuals with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Oral presentation at the RERC on AAC State of the Science Conference, Arlington, VA.
  • McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Pople, M. T. (1985). Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(5), 522–535. doi:10.2307/747940
  • Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. A. (1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(2), 131–140. doi:10.1044/jshd.5402.131
  • Muttiah, N., Drager, K. D., McNaughton, D., & Perera, N. (2018). Evaluating an AAC training for special education teachers in Sri Lanka, a low-and middle-income country. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 276–287. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1512651
  • O’Brien, A., O’Brien, M., Schlosser, R. W., Yu, C., Allen, A. A., Flynn, S., …, Shane, H. C. (2017). Repurposing consumer products as a gateway to just-in-time communication. Seminars in Speech and Language, 38, 297–312. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604277
  • O’Neill, T., Light, J., & Pope, L. (2018). Effects of interventions that include aided augmentative and alternative communication input on the communication of individuals with complex communication needs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61, 1743–1765. doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0132
  • Paul, R. (1997). Facilitating transitions in language development for children using AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(3), 141–148. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277958
  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H. C., Allen, A. A., Abramson, J., Laubscher, E., & Dimery, K. (2016). Just-in-time supports in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(1), 177–193. doi:10.1007/s10882-015-9452-2
  • Sigafoos, J., Drasgow, E., & Schlosser, R. (2003). Strategies for beginning communicators. In Schlosser  , The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 324–346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Smith, M., & Grove, N. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 163–195). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
  • Stahl, S. A. (1991). Beyond the instrumentalist hypothesis: Some relationships between word meanings and comprehension. In P. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 157–178). Hillsdale, N.H.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wilkinson, K. M., & Light, J. (2011). Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(6), 1644–1657. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0098)
  • Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(3), 137–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704522

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.