Preliminary investigation of the effects of a prelinguistic AAC intervention on social gaze behaviors from school-age children with multiple disabilities

References

• Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS One, 6(11), e27926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 6–9. doi:10.1037/a0030860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson, A. K., Granlund, M., & Wilder, J. (2013). Engagement in family activities: A quantitative, comparative study of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and children with typical development. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 523–534. doi:10.1111/cch.12044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios, B. A., & Hartmann, D. P. (1988). Recent developments in single-subject methodology: Methods for analyzing generalization, maintenance, and multi-component treatments. Progress in Behavior Modification, 22, 11–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter, M., & Iacono, T. (2002). Professional judgments of the intentionality of communicative acts. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(3), 177–191. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281261
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. (2002). Expanding children’s early augmented behaviors to support symbolic development. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 219–272). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., Bunning, K., Porter, J., & Olsson, C. (1999). See what I mean: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3), 190–203. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyfield, C., Caron, J. G., Drager, K., & Light, J. (2019). Effect of mobile technology featuring visual scene displays and just-in-time programming on communication turns by preadolescent and adolescent beginning communicators. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 201–211. doi:10.1080/17549507.2018.1441440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyfield, C., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., & Gormley, J. (2018). Effect of AAC partner training using video on peers’ interpretation of the behaviors of presymbolic middle-schoolers with multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 301–310. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1508306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Carter, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(2), 102–114. doi:10.1080/07434619812331278246
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, L. I. (2003). Functional Communication Profile—Revised. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R., Levin, J., Odom, S., Rindskopf, D., & Shadish, W. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 124–144. doi:10.1037/a0017736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligeza, T. S., Tymorek, A. D., & Wyczesany, M. (2017). Top-down and bottom-up competition in visual stimuli processing. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 77(4), 305–316. doi:10.21307/ane-2017-063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, C., & Granlund, M. (2003). Presymbolic communication intervention. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 299–322). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olswang, L. B., Dowden, P., Feuerstein, J., Greenslade, K., Pinder, G. L., & Fleming, K. (2014). Triadic gaze intervention for young children with physical disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 1740–1753. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogletree, B., & Pierce, K. (2010). AAC for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities: Ideas for nonsymbolic communicators. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22(3), 273–287. doi:10.1007/s10882-009-9177-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150. doi:10.1177/001440290907500201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1997). Facilitating transitions in language development for children using AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(3), 141–148. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277958
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Brady, N. (2012). Teaching pragmatic skills to individuals with severe disabilities. AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities. In S. Johnston, J. Reichle, K. Feeley, & E. Jones (Eds.), AAC strategies for individual with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 3–23). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R., Hyatt, A., & Cheslock, M. (2002). A continuum of AAC language intervention strategies for beginning communicators. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 1–23). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(1), 36–44. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., & Lee, D. (2000). Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(4), 208–226. doi:10.1080/07434610012331279074
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, E., & Cress, C. (2002). Overview of the emergence of early AAC behaviors: Progression from communicative to symbolic skills. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 25–57). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Drasgow, E., & Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Strategies for beginning communicators. In R. W. Schlosser, The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 323–346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simacek, J., Pennington, B., Reichle, J., & Parker-McGowan, Q. (2018). Aided AAC for people with severe to profound and multiple disabilities: A systematic review of interventions and treatment intensity. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(1), 100–115. doi:10.1007/s41252-017-0050-4
   Google Scholar
• Striano, T., & Rochat, P. (1999). Developmental link between dyadic and triadic social competence in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(4), 551–562. doi:10.1348/026151099165474
   Google Scholar
• Tait, K., Sigafoos, J., Woodyatt, G., O'Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. (2004). Evaluating parent use of functional communication training to replace and enhance prelinguistic behaviours in six children with developmental and physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(21-22), 1241–1254. doi:10.1080/09638280412331280253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todman, J., & Dugard, P. (1999). Accessible randomization tests for single-case and small-n experimental designs in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(1), 69–82. doi:10.10080/07434619912331278585
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S. F., Yoder, P. J., Gazdag, G. E., Kim, K., & Jones, H. A. (1993). Facilitating prelinguistic communication skills in young children with developmental delay. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(1), 83–97. doi:10.1044/jshr.3601.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P. J., & Warren, S. F. (2001). Intentional communication elicits language-facilitating maternal responses in dyads with children who have developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106(4), 327–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar