Effect of partner reauditorization on young adults’ attitudes toward a child who communicated using nonelectronic augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Achmadi, D., van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Lang, R., … Marschik, P. B. (2015). Undergraduates’ perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18(1), 22–25. doi:10.3109/17518423.2014.962767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). (2019). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589942773&section=Key_Issues#AAC_Populations
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Bock, S., Thompson, J., & Kosuwan, K. (2002). Influence of communicative competence and Augmentative and alternative communication technique on children’s attitudes towards a peer who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 217–227. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281301
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., & Dennis, M. (1996). Attitudes of children toward a similar-aged child who uses augmentative communication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 78–87. doi:10.1080/07434619612331277528
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Fritz, H., Keller, A., & Dennis, M. (2000a). Attitudes of school-aged children towards their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(1), 13–26. doi:10.1080/07434610012331278874
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Kingsbury, K., Neff, A., & Dennis, M. (2000b). Influence of length of augmented message on children’s attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 239–249. doi:10.1080/07434610012331279094
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Thomson, J. R., Clay, S. L., Hutchins, M., Vogt, W. P., Romaniak, B., & Sokolowski, B. (2001). Preservice professionals’ attitudes towards children who use augmentative/alterative communication. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 255–271.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Calculator, S. N., & Molineux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative communication system user. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(5), 1105–1113. doi:10.1044/jshr.3505.1105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Johnson, D., & Calculator, S. N. (1998). Communicative competence as perceived in adults with severe speech impairments associated with cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(3), 667–675. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4103.667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., & McCoy, K. F. (2020). Service provider attitudes regarding conversational rule violations in three public settings. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(1), 4–17. doi:10.1080/07434618.2020.1740941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Yorkston, K. (1982). Communication interaction of adult communication augmentation system use. Topics in Language Disorders, 2(2), 39–53. doi:10.1097/00011363-198203000-00006
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., Armstrong, R., O'Connor, A., & Freeman, R. (1993). Children’s attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(4), 243–250. doi:10.1080/07434619312331276661
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, C., Trudeau, N., & Sutton, A. (2012). Performance of children with typical development when reading and interpreting graphic-symbol sequences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(2), 96–105. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.679236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2 nd ed.). New York London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C., & Marvin, C. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(4), 254–272. doi:10.1080/07434610310001598242
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2002). A comparison of the attitudes of teachers at special and educationally inclusive schools towards learners with little or no functional speech using communication devices. South African Journal of Education, 22, 213–218.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Horn, T., Samuels, A., & Schlosser, R. (2016). Children’s attitudes toward interaction with an unfamiliar peer with complex communication needs: Comparing high- and low-technology devices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 305–311. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1216597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff, B. E. (2017). AAC with energy—Earlier: Research shows that children with communication challenges do best when introduced to augmentative and alternative communication as early as 12 months. The ASHA Leader, 22(1), 48–53. doi:10.1044/leader.FTR2.22012017.48
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, S., Timler, G., & Yoder, D. (1985). Strategies for the prevention and repair of communication breakdown in interactions with communication board users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1(1), 38–51. doi:10.1080/07434618512331273511
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, C. W., & Gorenflo, D. W. (1991). The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(1), 19–26. doi:10.1044/jshr.3401.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1989). The interplay of communication device output mode and interaction style between nonspeaking persons and their speaking partners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(3), 320–333. doi:10.1044/jshd.5403.320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Bisantz, A. M., Sunm, M., Adams, K., & Yik, F. (2009). The effect of context priming and task type on augmentative communication performance. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 25, 19–31. doi:10.1080/07434610802131869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, L. A., & Bedrosian, J. L. (1992). Effects of speech output type, message length, and reauditorization on perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult AAC user. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(6), 1363–1366. doi:10.1044/jshr.3506.1363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, L. A., Bedrosian, J. L., Johnson, D. E., & Molineux, B. (1994). Variables affecting perceptions of social aspects of the communicative competence of an adult AAC user. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10(3), 129–137. doi:10.1080/07434619412331276840
   Google Scholar
• Hyppa-Martin, J., Collins, D., Chen, M., Amundson, C., Timinski, K., & Mizuko, M. (2016). Comparing first graders’ attitudes and preferences toward a peer using an iPad© -based speech-generating device and a non-electronic AAC system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(2), 94–104. doi:10.3109/07434618.2016.1146332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyppa-Martin, J., & Reichle, J. (2018). The effect of partner reauditorization on undergraduates’ attitudes toward a peer who communicates with augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(2), 657–671. doi:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S., & Feeley, K. (2012). AAC systems features. In AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 51–80). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S., Reichle, J., Feeley, K., & Jones, E. (2012). AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J. E., & Light, J. C. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 19, 104. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112043
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J. E., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 195–204. doi:10.1080/07434610400006646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58–75. doi:10.1177/0146167295211007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 1–18. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2002). Attitudes of children toward an unfamiliar peer using an AAC device with and without voice output. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 91–101. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281191
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Light, J. (2005). Attitudes towards individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(1), 41–55. doi:10.1080/07434610410001699753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D. (2002). enhancing participation in employment through AAC technologies. Assistive Technology, 14(1), 58–70. doi:10.1080/10400435.2002.10132055
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. B. (2002). Getting your wheel in the door”: successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 59–76. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281171
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Bopp, K. (2003). Playing the game”: Strategic competence in AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC (pp. 401–440). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Mustonen, T., Locke, P., Reichle, J., Solbrack, M., & Lindgren, A. (1991). An overview of augmentative and alternative communication systems. In J. Reichle, J. York, & J. Sigafoos (Eds.), Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities (pp. 1–38). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Richter, M., Ball, L. J., Beukelman, D. R., Lasker, J., & Ullman, C. (2003). Attitudes toward communication modes and message formulation techniques used for storytelling by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(3), 170–186. doi:10.1080/0743461031000116544
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, J., Curtis, C., Jesunathadas, J., & Strong, C. (1989). The modification of attitudes toward persons with disabilities: Is there a best way? International Journal of Special Education, 4, 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1997). Special education teacher attitudes toward AAC: Preliminary survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(3), 186–198. doi:10.1080/07434619712331278008
   Google Scholar
• Stern, S., Chobany, C., Beam, A., Hoover, B., Hull, T., Linsenbigler, M., … Rubright, C. (2017). Use of speech generating devices can improve perception of qualifications for skilled, verbal, and interactive Jobs. Work, 56(2), 199–211. doi:10.3233/WOR-172489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern, S. E., Mullennix, J., Fortier, A., & Steinhauser, E. (2010). Stereotypes of people with physical disabilities and speech impairments as detected by partially structured attitude measures. In Mullennix, J., & Stern, S. (Ed.), Computer synthesized speech technologies: Tools for aiding impairment. Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. (1971). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, D. D. (2002). Employers’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities in the workforce: Myths or realities? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(1), 2–10. doi:10.1177/108835760201700101
   Google Scholar