Expressive and receptive performance with graphic symbol sentences by individuals who use aided communication

References

• Batorowicz, B., Stadskleiv, K., Renner, G., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Assessment of aided language comprehension and use in children and adolescents with severe speech and motor impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(1), 54–67. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1420689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. WORD, 14(2–3), 150–177. doi:10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Harrington, N., & Hollerbach, Q. C. (2020). Tracking early sentence-building progress in graphic symbol communication. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 317–328. doi:10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., & Mansfield, L. (2017). Early sentence productions of 3- and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(7), 1930–1945. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., Webb, E., & Buenviaje, E. (2017). Early sentence productions of 5-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(3), 131–142. doi:10.1177/1525740116655804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. (2003). Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG). PsychCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, T., & Corbit, J. (2015). The development of symbolic representation. In L. S. Liben, U. Müller, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Cognitive processes (pp. 250–295). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V., & Hecht, B. F. (1983). Comprehension, production, and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34(1), 325–349. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.34.020183.001545
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., Soto, G., & Nelson, K. (2017). Language learning, recasts, and interaction involving AAC: Background and potential for intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(1), 42–50. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1278130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clendon, S., & Anderson, K. (2016). Syntax and morphology in aided language development. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? (pp. 119–140). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). PPVT-4: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody (ÉVIP). Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. (2000). Cognitive (Intelligence) Test: Nonverbal (CIT: Nv). Stoelting.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L. (1994). The picture communication symbols. Mayer Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & Binger, C. (2018). Methodological advances, opportunities, and challenges in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 93–103. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1456560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecocq, P. (1996). Épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique (ÉCOSSE). Presses Université de Septentrion.
   Google Scholar
• Mascolo, M.-É. (2013). Adaptation de tâches d’interprétation symbolique pour une population d’enfants ayant une paralysie cérébrale (travail dirigé) [Unpublished master’s research paper]. École d’orthophonie et d’audiologie, Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Neuvonen, K. A., Launonen, K., Smith, M. M., Stadskleiv, K., & von Tetzchner, S. (2022). Strategies in conveying information about unshared events using aided communication. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 38(1), 78–94. doi:10.1177/02656590211050865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, G. (2003). The development of communication with alternative means for Vygotsky’s cultural-historical perspective. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 67–82). Whurr/John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Roid, G., & Miller, L. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised (Leiter-R). Stoelting.
   Google Scholar
• Savaldi-Harussi, G., Lustigman, L., & Soto, G. (2019). The emergence of clause construction in children who use speech generating devices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(2), 109–119. doi:10.1080/07434618.2019.1584642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(1), 36–44. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1993). Effects of initial element teaching in a storytelling context on Blissymbol acquisition and generalization. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(5), 979–995. doi:10.1044/jshr.3605.979
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(3), 215–233. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1062553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. (2016). Symbolic representation and graphic symbol use: Insights from typical development. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 65–118). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Morford, J. P., & Gallagher, T. M. (2004). Production and comprehension of graphic symbol utterances expressing complex propositions by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication systems. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(3), 349–371. doi:10.1017/S014271640400116X
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(3), 192–204. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281271
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J. P., & Smith, M. M. (2021). Expressive and receptive use of speech and graphic symbols by typically developing children: What skills contribute to performance on structured sentence-level tasks? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), 155–167. doi:10.1080/17549507.2020.1756406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M., & Poirier, M.-A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37(1), 1–26. doi:10.1017/S0305000909009477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2013). Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(3), 235–245. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., & Morford, J. P. (2014). An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(3), 187–199. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Morford, J. P., Côté-Giroux, P., Pauzé, A.-M., & Vallée, V. (2010). Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(4), 299–312. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.529619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on aided language processes, development, and use: An international perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1422020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Tetzchner, S., & Stadskleiv, K. (2016). Constructing a language in alternative forms. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 17–34). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar