Common ground in AAC: how children who use AAC and teaching staff shape interaction in the multimodal classroom

References

• Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In S. Sidnell & J. T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315687537
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Mavers, D. (2011). Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 191–206. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.563616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2011). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems: Acquired dysarthria in conversation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(5), 510–523. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00076.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511620539
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2016). Co-construction, asymmetry and multimodality in children’s conversations. In M. M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 177–198). J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Soto, G., & Nelson, K. (2017). Language learning, recasts, and interaction involving AAC: Background and potential for intervention. Augmentative and alternative communication, 33(1), 42–50. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1278130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 336–348. doi:10.1080/07434610701390350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Communicative competence in children’s peer interactions. In N. Norén, C. Samuelsson, & C. Plejert (Eds.), Aided communication in everyday interaction (pp. 23). J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. doi:10.1080/10508400903452884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeThorne, L. S., & Searsmith, K. (2021). Autism and neurodiversity: Addressing concerns and offering implications for the school-based speech-language pathologist. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 6(1), 184–190. doi:10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00188
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: some research procedures and their rationales. In Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fasulo, A., & Fiore, F. (2007). A valid person: Non-competence as a conversational outcome. In A. Hepburn, & S. Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction (pp. 224–246). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fasulo, A., & Monzoni, C. (2009). Assessing mutable objects: A multimodal analysis. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42(4), 362–376. doi:10.1080/08351810903296481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170. doi:10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283–307. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V., & Kern, F. (2021). The co-construction of competence: Trusting autistic children’s abilities in interactions with peers and teachers. Linguistics and Education, 65, 100975. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2021.100975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (2009). In-person interaction in AAC: New perspectives on utterances, multimodality, timing, and device design. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 154–160. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.154
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Caves, K. (2002). AAC performance and usability issues: The effect of AAC technology on the communicative process. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 14(1), 45–57. doi:10.1080/10400435.2002.10132054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Engelke, C. R. (2013). A primer for doing talk-in-interaction research in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative communication, 29(1), 3–19. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Fulcher, K., & Seale, J. M. (2016). Time and timing in ALS in interactions involving individuals with ALS, their unimpaired partners and their speech generating devices. In M. Smith (Ed.), Language learning and language use in aided communication. J&R Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. B., Vasalou, A., Clarke, M. (2018). Design opportunities for AAC and children with severe speech and physical impairments. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 227:1–227:13. doi:10.1145/3173574.3173801
   Google Scholar
• Jagoe, C., & Smith, M. (2016). Relevance in the context of multimodality and aided communication. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language learning and language use in aided communication. J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J. J., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korkiakangas, T., & Rae, J. (2014). The interactional use of eye-gaze in children with autism spectrum disorders. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 15(2), 233–259. doi:10.1075/is.15.2.12kor
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manyukhina, Y., Wyse, D. (2021). Children’s agency: What is it, and what should be done? Children’s Agency: What Is It, and What Should Be Done? https://www.bera.ac.uk/blog/childrens-agency-what-is-it-and-what-should-be-done
   Google Scholar
• Müller, E., & Soto, G. (2002). Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: Variations across partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 77–90. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281181
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning—A cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 763–780. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00042-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén, N., Svensson, E., & Telford, J. (2013). Participants’ dynamic orientation to folder navigation when using a VOCA with a touch screen in talk-in-interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(1), 20–36. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940691989922. doi:10.1177/1609406919899220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pilesjö, M. S. (2014). Creating meaning through the coordination of gaze direction and arm/hand movement. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 5(1), 63–96. doi:10.1558/jircd.v5i1.63
   Google Scholar
• Pullin, G., Treviranus, J., Patel, R., & Higginbotham, J. (2017). Designing interaction, voice, and inclusion in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 139–148. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1342690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, I., Klippi, A., Tykkyläinen, T., & Launonen, K. (2020). Linguistic and temporal resources of pre-stored utterances in everyday conversations. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 36(3), 195–214. doi:10.1177/0265659020950388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon-Rice, P., & Soto, G. (2011). Co-construction as a facilitative factor in supporting the personal narratives of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(2), 70–82. doi:10.1177/1525740109354776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Olmstead, W. (1993). A semiotic perspective for AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(2), 134–141. doi:10.1080/07434619312331276521
   Google Scholar
• Sterponi, L., & de Kirby, K. (2016). A multidimensional reappraisal of language in autism: Insights from a discourse analytic study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 394–405. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2679-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegler, H., Demmelmaier, I., Johansson, M. B., & Norén, N. (2020). Creating a response space in multiparty classroom settings for students using eye-gaze accessed speech-generating devices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(4), 203–213. doi:10.1080/07434618.2020.1811758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetzchner, S. V., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(3), 141–149. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.610356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. J., & Kretschmer, R. R. (1999). How adult beliefs shape the speech communities of a child who has multiple disabilities. Mental Retardation, 37(5), 395–406. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037<0395:HABSTS>2.0.CO;2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valencia, S., Pavel, A., Santa Maria, J., Yu, S. G., Bigham, J. P., Admoni, H. (2020). Conversational agency in augmentative and alternative communication. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. doi:10.1145/3313831.3376376
   Google Scholar