Augmentative and alternative communication: A field in transition

References

• Beukelman, D. R., & Garrett, K. L. (1988). Augmentative and alter-native communication for adults with acquired severe communi-cation disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 104–121.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1988). Promoting the acquisition and generalization of conversational skills by individuals with severe disabilities. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1979). Nonspeech communication. In N. R. Ellis, (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research (2nd Ed.) (pp. 401–430, Chap. 11). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Galyas, K. (1987). Microcomputer technology and speech synthesis in communication aids. A paper presented at the August 14–17 think tank, entitled Augmentative and Alternative Communication: State of the Art and Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Galyas, K., Lundman, M., & Lagerman, U. (1982). (Eds.). Kommuni-cation for Gravt Talhandikappade (Communication for Severely Speech Handicapped). Broma, Sweden: Handikappinstitutet. (Some papers in Swedish & some in English).
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, K. A., & Lloyd, L. L. (1987). Early cognitive skills as prereq-uisites to augmentative and alternative communication use: What are we waiting for? Unpublished manuscript under review.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C. (1977). Alternative to speech: A review of research on manual and other forms of communication with the mentally hand-icapped and other noncommunicating populations. British Journal of Mental Subnormality, 23, 6–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C., Reid, B., & Jones, L. (1982). Signs and symbols: A review of literature and survey of the use of non-vocal communication. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, L. J. S. (1987). AAC Strategies in reading and writing. A paper presented at the August 14–16 think tank, entitled Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication: Stare of the Art and Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. W. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A stare of the art report and appendices. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled (for IPCAS).
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1980). Unaided non-speech communication for severely handicapped individuals: An extensive bibliography. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Editorial (Historic comments). Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 67–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G. R. (1984). Nonspeech communication symbols and systems: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 28, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardino, L., & Langley, B. (1987). Consideration for the commu-nication development of very young (high-risk) children, and phys-ically and/or intellectually handicapped individuals. A paper pre-sented at the August 14–16 think tank, entitled Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Stare of the Art and Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. E. (1986). Future needs and directions in augmentative communication. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Aug-mentative Communication: An Introduction (pp. 471–494). Rock-ville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton, K. T., & Algozzine, B. (1980). Manual communication and mental retardation: A review of research and implications. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 145–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Karlan, G. (1988). Selecting augmentative communi-cation interventions, a critique of candidacy criteria and a proposed alternative. In R. L. Schiefelbusch, & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 321–329). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Lloyd, L. L., & Sevcik, R. A. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication issues. In R. L. Schiefelbusch, & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.) Language Perspectives: Acquisition, retardation and Intervention (2nd ed., pp. 343–366). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., &, Sevcik, R. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tions, 4, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D. (1976). A model for communication. In L. L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 1–32). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Yoder, D. E. (1986). Overview. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 1–28). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, D. E., & Kraat, A. (1983). Intervention issues in nonspeech communication. In J. Miller, D. E. Yoder, & R. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Language Intervention (AS HA Report #12) (pp. 27–51). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar