Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities

References

• Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and com-munication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S.1988. Promoting the acquisition and generalization of conversational skills by individuals with severe disabilities. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, J. (1974). Nonspeech noun usage training with severely and profoundly retarded children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Re-search, 17, 510–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R., & Miller, J. (1980). Analyzing language and communi-cation in the child. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication: Analysis and intervention (pp. 159–196). Bal-timore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cirrin, F., & Rowland, C. (1985). Communicative assessment of nonverbal youths with severe/profound mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 23, 52–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, C. (1981). Learning words using traditional orthography and the symbols of Rebus, Bliss, and Carrier. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 191–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connell, P., Spradlin, J., & McReynolds, L. (1977). Some suggested criteria for evaluation of language programs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 563–567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deich, R., & Hodges, P. (1977). Language without speech. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R., Reichle, J., Williams, W., & Vogelsberg, R. T. (1982). Motoric factors influencing the selection of vocabulary for sign production programs. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• DonneIlan, A., Mirenda, P., Mesaros, R., & Fassbender, L. (1984). Analyzing the communicative functions of aberrant behavior. Jour-nal of the Association for Severely Handicapped, 9, 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Silverman, F. (1977). Impacts of learning Amer-Ind on mentally retarded children: A preliminary report. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst, C., & Lowe, L. (1986). From reflex to symbol: Describing, explaining, and fostering communicative competence. Augmenta-rive and Alternative Communication, 2, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, S., & Reichle, J. (1987). A comparison of normal children's ability to recall symbols from two logographic systems. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gobbi, L., Copani, E., Hudson, C., & Lapenta-Neudeck, R. (1986). Developing spontaneous requesting among children with severe retardation. Mental Retardation, 24, 357–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goossens, C. (1983). The relative iconicity and leamability of verb reference differentially represented by manual signs, Blissymbols, and rebus symbols: An investigation with moderately retarded individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, C., & Kraat, A. (1985). Technology as a tool for conver-sation and language learning for the physically disabled. Topics in Language Disorders, 6, 56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, P., & Robinson, J. (1980). Influence of iconicity and phono logical similarity on sign learning by mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 291–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guess, D., & Homer, R. (1978). The severely and profoundly handi-capped. In E. L. Meyen (Ed.), Exceptional children and youth: An introduction (pp. 218–268). Denver: Love Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Guess, D., Sailor, W., & Baer, D. (1974). To teach language to retarded children. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation and intervention (pp. 529–563). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, J. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handicapped: An integrative model of natural environment teaching techniques. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, J., Baer, D., & Spradlin, J. (1981). Teacher's generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, /4, 389–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halle, J., Marshall, A., & Spradlin, J. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, /2, 431–439.
   Google Scholar
• Harris-Vanderheiden, D., Brown, W., MacKenzie, P., Reinen, S., & Scheibe, C. (1975). Symbol communication for the mentally hand-icapped. Mental Retardation, 73, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, P., & Schwethelm, B. (1984). A comparison of the effective-ness of graphic symbol and manual sign training with profoundly retarded children. Applied Psycholinquistics, 5, 223–253.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, J., Reichle, J., Van Tasell, D., & Cole, D. (1987). The intelligibility of synthesized speech: Echo ll versus Votrax. Journal of Speech and Heating Research, 30, 425–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hooper, C., & Hemlick, R. (1977). Nonverbal communication and the severely handicapped: Some considerations. AAESPH Review, 2, 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbut, B., lwata, B., & Green, J. (1982). Non-vocal language acqui-sition in adolescents with severe physical disabilities: Blissymbol versus iconic stimulus formats. Journal of Applied Behavior Analy-sis, 15, 241–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh, W., & Reichle, J. (1985). Communication intervention for the "difficult-to-teach" severely handicapped. In S. Warren & A. K. Rogers-Warren (Eds.), Teaching functional language (pp. 157–194). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C. (1982). Signs and symbols: Use of non-vocal communi-cation systems. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, M., & Mervis, C. (1984). Interactive basis of severely handi-capped and normal children's acquisition of referential language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 534–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knudson, C. A. (1980). Rare of enactive vs. iconic manual sign acquisition by retarded learners. Unpublished master's thesis, Uni-versity of Kansas, Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A., & Levinson, E. (1984, October). Intelligibility of two speech synthesizers used in augmentative communication devices for the severely speech impaired. Paper presented at the Third Interna-tional Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, J., Carrier, J., & Hollis, J. (1978). A nonvocal system of teaching retarded children to read and write. In C. E. Meyers (Ed.), Quality of life in severely and profoundly mentally retarded people: Research foundations for improvement (pp. 145-191) (American Association on Mental Deficiency Monograph No. 3). Washington, DC: AAMD.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. (1986, September). Augmentative and alternative commu-nication symbols: Recent developments and research issues. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Cardiff, Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alter-native communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed superordi-nate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, P., & Mirenda, P. (1988). A computer-supported communica-tion approach for a child with severe communication, visual, and cognitive impairments: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mclvane, W., Bass, R., O'Brien, J., Gerovac, B., & Stoddard, L. (1984). Spoken and signed naming of foods after receptive exclu-sion training in severe retardation. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 1–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLean, J., & Snyder-McLean, L. (1978). A transactional approach to early language training. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, J., & Snyder-McLean, L. (1988). Application of pragmatics to severely mentally retarded children and youth. In R. L. Schiefel-busch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language Perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 255–288). Austin, TX: Pro ED.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1985). Designing pictorial communication systems for physically able-bodied students with severe handicaps. Augment-ative and Alternative Communication, 1, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Dattilo, J. (1987). Instructional techniques in alternative communication for students with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Santogrossi, J. (1985). A prompt-free strategy to teach pictorial communication system use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C., & Ruscello, D. (1984). Transparency of three com-munication symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Re-search, 27, 436–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C., & St. Louis, K. (1982). Communication programming for the severely handicapped. San Diego: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., & Halle, J. (1982). Language training in the everyday environment: Teaching functional signs to a retarded child. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Punzi, L., & Kraat, A. (1984, October). The effect of context on preschool children's understanding of synthetic speech: A pilot study. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (1978). Gestural facilitation of expressive language in mod-erately/severely retarded preschoolers. Mental Retardation, 16, 113–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reichle, J., Barrett, C., Tetlie, R., & McQuarter, R. (1987). The effect
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Rogers, N., & Barrett, C. (1984). Establishing pragmatic discriminations among the communicative functions of requesting, rejecting, and commenting in an adolescent. Journal of the Asso-ciation for the Severely Handicapped, 9, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Ward, M. (1985). Teaching discriminative use of an encoding electronic communication device and Signing Exact Eng-lish to a moderately handicapped child. Language, Speech and Heating Services in the Schools, /6, 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Williams, W., & Ryan, S. (1981). Selecting signs for the formulation of an augmentative communication modality. The Jour-nal of the Association for Severely Handicapped, 6, 48-56. of prior intervention to establish generalized requesting on the acquisition of object labels. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 3, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Karlan, G. (1985). The selection of an augmentative system in communication intervention: A critique of decision rules. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 10, 146–156.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Keogh, W. (1986). Communication instruction for learn-ers with severe handicaps: Some unresolved issues. In R. Homer, L. Meyer, & H. B. Fredericks (Eds.), Education of learners with severe handicaps (pp. 189–219). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Pub-lishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Yoder, D. (1985). Communication board use in severely handicapped learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 16, 146–157.
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler, G. (1985, November). The intelligibility of computer syn-thesized speech for language impaired children. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Lan-guage-Hearing Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. (1980). Cognition to language: Categories, word meanings, and training. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. (1983). Contemporary accounts of the cognition/language relationship: Implications for language clinicians. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 347–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice, M., & Kemper, S. (1984). Child language and cognition. Balti-more: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, T. (1975). Sign language for the SMR and PMR. Mental Retardation, 13, 17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers-Warren, A., & Warren, S. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly trained language in children. Be-havior Modification, 4, 362–382.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Lloyd, L. L., & Sevcik, R. A. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication issues. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation and intervention (2nd Ed., pp. 343–366). Austin, TX: Pro Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Reumann, R., & Sevcik, R. A. (1988). Youngsters with moderate or severe retardation and severe oral language impair-ments II: Partner communicative input. Unpublished manuscript: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1986). Implication for language intervention research: A nonhuman primate model. In E. S. Savage-Rumbaugh (Ed.), Ape language: From conditioned re-sponse to symbol (pp. 355–374). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Washburn, D. (1987, May). Micro-computer communication system implementation in homes and classrooms of nonspeaking youngsters with retardation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Joyner, S. E. (1984). Nonspeech communication systems: Implications for language intervention with mentally retarded children. Topics in Language Disorders, 5, 66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Pate, J. L. (1988). The establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe mental retar-dation. Journal of Speech and Heating Disorders, 53, 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Reumann, R., & Pate, J. L. (1988). Youngsters with moderate or severe retardation and severe oral language impairments I: Home and school communicative patterns. Unpublished manuscript: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (1985). Retention of symbolic communication in five severely retarded persons. Amer-ican Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 441–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruder, K., Hermann, P., & Schiefelbusch, R. (1977). Effects of verbal imitation and comprehension training on verbal production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6, 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ruder, K., Smith, M., & Hermann, P. (1974). Effects of verbal imitation and comprehension on verbal production of lexical items. In L.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds (Ed.), Developing systematic procedures for training children's language (ASHA Monographs No. 18, pp. 15–29). Rock-ville, MD: American Speech and Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Rumbaugh, D. M., & Boysen, S. (1980). Do apes have language? American Scientist, 68, 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. A. (1988). Comprehension of synthesized speech by nonspeaking adults with severe retardation. Unpublished manuscript: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. (1980). Approaches to assessing the communication of nonoral persons. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication (pp. 199–224). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H., & Bashir, A. (1980). Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: Preliminary considerations, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 408–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snell, M. (1987). Systematic instruction of persons with severe hand-icaps. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, L., Battle, C., & Hill, J. (1980). Prelanguage communication programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped. Journal of the Association of the Severely Handicapped, 5, 224–233.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, L., McNerney, C., & Pegnatore, L. (1985). Developing co-active imitative behaviors with profoundly mentally handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 260–267.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, L., & Owens, A. (1985). Establishing pre-language sig-nalling behavior with profoundly mentally handicapped students: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 29, 81–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sternberg, L., Pegnatore, L., & Hill, C. (1983). Establishing interactive communication behaviors with profoundly mentally handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. (1986a). Funding VOCAS for the lower cognitive function-ing population. Closing the Gap, 5, 26.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. (1986b). Funding VOCAS for the low functioning. Com-munication Outlook, 8, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Lloyd, L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. E. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative com-munication: An introduction (pp. 49–161). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Yoder, D. (1986). Overview. In S. E. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 1–28). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S., & Kaiser, A. (1986). Incidental language teaching: A critical review. Journal of Speech and Heating Disorders, 57, 291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Wickstrom, S., Goldstein, H., & Johnson, L. (1985). On the subject of subjects: Suggestions for describing subjects in language inter-vention studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 282–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar