References
- Brown, R. (1977, August). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Keynote address presented at the Na-tional Association of the Deaf, Chicago.
- DePaul, R., & Yoder, D. E. (1986). Iconicity in manual sign systems for the augmentative communication user: Is that all there is? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 1–10.
- Dunham, J. K. (1986). The transparency of manual signs in a linguistic and an environmental nonlinguistic context. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 146A.
- Fuller, D. R. (1987). Effects of translucency and complexity on the associative learning of Blissymbols by cognitively normal children and adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
- Goossens', C. A. (1984). The relative iconicity and learnability of verb referents differentially repesented as manual signs, Blissymbolics, and Rebus symbols: An investigation with moderately retarded individuals. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1983). Dis-sertation Abstracts International, 45, 809A.
- Griffith, P. L. (1980). The influence of iconicity and phonological similarity in the perception of American Sign Language by retar-dates. (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1979). Disser-tation Abstracts International, 40, 5398A.
- Griffith, P. L., & Robinson, J. H. (1980). Influence of iconicity and phonological similarity on sign learning by mentally retarded chil-dren. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 291–298.
- Konstantareas, M. M., Oxman, J., & Webster, C. D. (1978). Iconicity: Effects on the acquisition of sign language by autistic and other severely dysfunctional children. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press.
- Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A. (1985). An investigation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 32–37.
- Luftig, R. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (1981). Manual sign translucency and referential concreteness in the learning of signs. Sign Language Studies, 30, 49–60.
- Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
- Musselwhite, C. R., & Ruscello, D. M. (1984). Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 436–443.
- Polzer, K. R., Wankoff, L. L., &, Wollner, S. G. (1979, April-May). The acquisition of arbitrary and iconic signs: Imitation versus compre-hension. Paper presented to the New York State Speech and Hearing Association.
- Snyder-McLean, L. (1978, November). Functional stimulus and re-sponse variables in sign training with retarded subjects. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Francisco.
- Yovetich, W. S., & Paivio, A. (1980). Cognitive processing of Bliss-like symbols by normal populations: A report on four studies. Proceedings of the European Association for Special Education, Helsinki, Finland.