Toward a common usage of iconicity terminology

REFERENCES

• Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. (1976). Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In S. Harmad, H. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), The origins and evolution of language and speech (pp. 514–538). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, A. F. (1987). A response to Lloyd and Fuller: Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed superordinate classification. Augmentative and Altema-tie Communication, 3, 97–99.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Re-search, 33, 717–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1977, May-June). Why are signed languages easier to /earn than spoken languages? Keynote address at the National Association of the Deaf Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1978). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Part two. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 32, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). On cognitive growth. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 1–29). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E. (1986). The effects of translucency and handshape difficulty on sign acquisition and retention by preschool children. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1985). Dissertation Ab-stracts International, 46, 3317A.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E., & Lloyd, L. L. (1983, May). The effects of production mode, translucency, and manuality on sign acquisition by retarded adults. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Conference of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham, J. K. (1986). The transparency of manual signs in a linguistic and an environmental nonlinguistic context. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 146A.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M. (1987). Terminology in augmentative communication. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 188–190.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1977, March). The use of manual commu-nication with the retarded. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Gatlinburg Conference on Research in Mental Retardation, Gatlin-burg, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1979). Nonspeech communication. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental retardation: Psychological the-ory and research (2nd ed., pp. 401–430). New York: Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R. (1988). Effects of translucency and complexity on the paired associate learning of Blissymbols by cognitively normal children and adults. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 710B.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., & Stratton, M. M. (1991). Representativeness versus translucency: Different theoretical backgrounds, but are they really different concepts? A position paper. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. A. (1984). The relative iconicity and learnability of verb referents differentially represented as manual signs, Blissymbolics, and Rebus symbols: An investigation with moderately retarded Individuals. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1983). Dis-sertation Abstracts International, 45, 809A.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, P. L., & Robinson, J. H. (1980). Influence of iconicity and phonological similarity on sign learning by mentally retarded chil-dren. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 291–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffith, P. L., Robinson, J. H., & Panagos, J. M. (1981). Perception of iconicity in American Sign Language by hearing and deaf subjects. Journal of Speech and Heating Disorders, 46, 388–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, J. M. (1989). Comment on terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 74.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantareas, M. M., Oxman, J., & Webster, C. D. (1978). Iconicity: Effects on the acquisition of sign language by autistic and other severely dysfunctional children. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 213–237). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1984). Comments on terminology. Communicating To-gether, February 2, 19-21. (Reprinted in Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 1985, 1, 95–97.)
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed super-ordinate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 2, 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. I. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Kangas, K. A. (1988). AAC terminology policy and issues. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Kangas, K. A. (1990). AAC terminology policy and issues update. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 167–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G. R. (1983). Translucency values for functional manual signs (working title). Unpublished data, Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Karlan, G. R., & Nail, B. (1990). Translucency values for 910 Blissymbols (working title). Unpublished data, Purdue Univer-sity.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L. (1983). Manual sign translucency and referential con-creteness in the sign learning of moderately/severely mentally retarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A. (1985a). An initial investigation of the effects of translucency, transparency, and component complexity of Blissymbolics. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 8, 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A. (1985b). An investigation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, /, 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (1981). Manual sign translucency and referential concreteness in the learning of signs. Sign Language Studies, 30, 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., Lloyd, L. L., & Page, J. L. (1982). Ratings of sign translucency and gloss concreteness of two grammatical classes of signs. Sign Language Studies, 37, 305–343.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., Page, J. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (1983). Ratings of translucency in manual signs as a predictor of sign learnability. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 6, 117–134.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. A. (1989). A comparison of symbol transpar-ency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Heating Disorders, 54, 131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R. (1987). Further comments on terminology. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 164–165.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., & Ruscello, D. M. (1984). Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, J. L. (1982). Comparison of translucency ratings of manual signs representing nomination, action, and attribution by pre-school, school-age, and adult subjects. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 3211B.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., & Fristoe, M. (1990). "A spinach with a V on it": What 3-year-olds see in standard and enhanced Blissymbols. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 149–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stokoe, W.C., Casterline, D.C., & Croneberg, C.G. (1965). A dictio-nary of American Sign Language based on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher, K., & Bray, N. (1984, March). Effects of iconicity, faction, and training technique on the initial acquisition of manual signing by the mentally retarded. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Gatlinburg Conference on Research in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Gatlinburg, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Waksvik, K. (1985). Readers forum. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 52–54.
   Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W. S. (1985). Cognitive processing of Blissymbols by nor-mal adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of West-ern Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W. S., & Young, T. A. (1988). The effects of representative-ness and concreteness on the "guessability" of Blissymbols. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 35–39.
   Google Scholar