The Communication Resource Center: A New Jersey AAC service delivery model

REFERENCES

• Blackstone, S. W. (1988). Augmentative communication: Clinical management process model. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 136–163). Philadel-phia: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., & Isaacson, R. (1988). Service delivery in augmen-tative communication. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally im-paired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 312–329). Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J., & Romich, B. (1989). Beyond device characteristics. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 5,203–204.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. G. (1988). Establishing equipment requirements for an evaluation facility: A generic guide. In S. Blackstone, E. L. Cassatt-James, & D. Bruskin (Eds.), Augmentative communication: Imple-mentation strategies (pp. 4:2-4:8). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. (1988). Referral mechanisms for a communication aids program in an urban school district. In S. Blackstone, E. L. Cas-satt-James, & D. Bruskin (Eds.), Augmentative communication: Implementation strategies (pp. 3:22-3:30). Rockville, MD: Ameri-can Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Coston, C. A. (Ed.) (1988). Proceedings of the National Planners Conference on Assistive Device Service Delivery. Washington, DC: RESNA, Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. M., Ambrosia, D. M., Berniger, T. M., & Mitchell, J. O. (1986). Augmentative communication aid use-A follow-up study. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter, F., & Lafontaine, L. M. (1987). The nonspeaking brain-in-jured: A clinical and demographic database report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P., Beukelman, D. R., & Lossing, C. (1986). Serving non-speaking patients in acute care settings: Intervention outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, R. A., Soede, M., & van Balkom, H. (1987). Statistical disam-biguation of multi-character keys applied to reduce motor require-ments for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,192–195.
   Google Scholar
• Haddow, J. (1988). The implementation of the service delivery system at the Rocky Mountain Regional Center for Augmentative Commu-nication at Memorial Hospital of Boulder. In C. A. Coston (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Planners Conference on Assist/ye Device Service Delivery (pp. 123–128). Washington, DC: RESNA, Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorne, C. W., Voda, J. A., & Leibowitz, L. J. (1987). Design rationale and evaluation of the portable anticipatory communica-tion aid-PACA. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1989). The interplay of communication device output mode and interaction style between nonspeaking persons and their speaking partners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Dis-orders, 54, 320–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinderscheit, L. R., & Reichle, J. (1987). Teaching direct select color encoding to an adolescent with multiple handicaps. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Kirstein, I. J., & Peters, N. A. (1988). Establishing an equipment library. In S. Blackstone, E. L. Cassatt-James, & D. Bruskin (Eds.), Augmentative communication: Implementation strategies (pp. 4:18-4:27). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lafontaine, L. M., & DeRuyter, F. (1987). The nonspeaking cerebral palsied: Aclinical and demographic database report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Beesly M., & Collier, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication systems: A three-year case study of a head-injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1990). A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listen-ers from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 6,61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Mustonen, T., Sigafoos, J., Hinderscheit, L., Wiemann, G., & Locke, P. (1989). Comments on augmentative and alternative communication evaluation and system selection: A response to Woltosz. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,204–207.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Kelso, D. P. (1987). Comparative analysis of fixed-vocabulary communication acceleration techniques. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 3,196–206.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1988). Issues in planning a statewide tech service delivery program for special education. In C. A. Coston (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Planners Conference on Assis-tive Device Service Delivery (pp. 24–29). Washington, DC: RESNA, Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Tech-nology.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tatenhove, G., & Osborn, S. (1988). Setting up and marketing an augmentative communication inservice program. In S. Black-stone, E. L. Cassatt-James, & D. Bruskin (Eds.), Augmentative communication: Implementation strategies (pp. 7:6-7:16). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Woltosz, W. S. (1988). A proposed model for augmentative and alternative evaluation and system selection. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 233–236.
   Google Scholar