REFERENCES
- Bernstein, L. (1990). Quoted in Newsweek Magazine October 29.
- Beukelman, D. (1990). AAC in the 1990's: A clinical perspective. In B. Mineo (ed.), Augmentative and alternative communica-tion in the next decade: Visions conference proceedings (pp. 105–107). Wilmington, DE: Applied Science and Engineering Laboratories, University of Delaware and Alfred I. du Pont.
- Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K., & Dowden, P. (1985). Communi-cation augmentation: A casebook of clinical management. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
- Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Aphasia and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.
- Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G., & Lloyd, L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented by five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33,717–725.
- Boyers, E., & Rice, R. E. (1990). The new American scholar. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Foundation.
- Crossley, R. (1991). Communication training involving facilitated communication. Communication Together, 9(2), 19–22.
- Crossley, R., & McDonald, A. (1984). Annie's coming out. New York: Viking Penguin.
- Crystal, D. (1986). ISAAC in chains: The future of communica-tion systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 140–145.
- Dowden, P., Beukelman, D., & Lossing, C. (1986). Serving non-speaking patients in acute care settings: Intervention out-comes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 38–44.
- Ecklund, S., & Reichle, J. (1987). A comparison of normal chil-dren's ability to recall symbols from two logographic systems. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 34–40.
- Hoover, J., Reichle, J., Van Tassell, D., & Cole, D. (1987). The intelligibility of synthesized speech: Echo ll versus Votrax. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 425–431.
- Light, J., Beesly, M., & Collier, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication sys-tems: A three-year case study of a head-injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 2–14.
- Logan, J., Pisoni, D., & Greene, B. (1985). Measuring the seg-mental intelligibility of synthetic speech: Results from eight text-to-speech systems. Research on Speech Perception (Progress Report No. 11). Bloomington: Indiana University.
- Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 58–64.
- Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1990). A comparison of intelligi-bility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 6,61–68.
- Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. (1989). A comparison of symbol trans-parency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131–140.
- Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of sym-bols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 3,129–136.
- Mizuko, M., & Reichle, J. (1989). Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectually handicapped adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 627–633.
- Musselwhite, C., & St. Louis, K. (1988). Communication pro-gramming for persons with severe handicaps (2nd ed). Bos-ton: College-Hill Press.
- Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing aug-mentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
- Schank, R. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, Macmillan Publishing Co.