Comprehension of synthetic speech with three text-to-speech systems using a sentence verification paradigm

REFERENCES

• Clark, H., & Chase, W. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. (1972). Cognitive economy in semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 149–154.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., & Kraatt, A. (1985). Technology as a tool for conversation and language learning for the physically dis-abled. Topics in Language Disorders, 6, 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. (1965). Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behav-ior, 4, 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. (1966). The verification of sentences: The effects of delay of evidence and sentence length. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 492–496.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, J., Reichle, J., Van Tasell, D., & Cole, D. (1987). The intelligibility of synthesized speech: Echo ll versus Votrax. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 425–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly, L., & Chial, M. (1989, November). Patterns of communica-tion repair during tasks directed by speech synthesizers. Pa-per presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, P., & Mirenda, P. (1988). A computer-supported commu-nication approach for a child with severe communication, vis-ual, and cognitive impairments: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. S., Greene, B., & Pisoni, D. (1989). Segmental intelli-gibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86(2), 566–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manous, L., Pisoni, D., Dedina, J., & Nusbaum, H. (1985). Com-prehension of natural and synthetic speech using a sentence verification task (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 11). Bloomington, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. In U. Frauenfelder & L. Tyler (Eds.), Spoken word recognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marthy-Laikko, P., Iacono, T., Ratcliffe, A., Villarruel, F., Yoder, D., & Vanderheiden, G. (1989). Teaching a child with multiple disabilities to use a tactile augmentative communication de-vice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Buekelman, D. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1990). A comparison of intelligi-bility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 6, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P., & Atkins, C. (1989). A comparison of the single word intelligibility of two voice output communication aids. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 5, 84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, H., & Pisoni, D. (1984). Perceptual evaluation of synthetic speech generated by rule (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10). Bloomington, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D., & Hunnicutt, S. (1980). Perceptual evaluation of MI-Talk: The MIT unrestricted text-to-speech system. In 1980 IEEE International Conference Record on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal processing (pp.572-575). New York: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D., Manous, L., & Dedina, M. (1987). Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech: II. Effects of predictability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelligibility. Computer, Speech and Language, 2, 303–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ralston, J. V., Pisoni, D. B., Mullennix, J. W. (1989). Comprehen-sion of synthetic speech produced by rule (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 15). Bloomington, Indiana University
   Google Scholar
• Ralston, J. V., Pisoni, D. B., Lively, S. E., Greene, B. G., & Mullennix, J. W. (1991). Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times. Human Factors, 33, 471–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A., (1988). Augmentative and alter-native communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, 4, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, E., Nusbaum, H., & Pisoni, D. (1985). Some effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech. Human Factors, 27, 395–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar