71
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Prevalence and policy implications of communication disabilities among adults

, &
Pages 273-280 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Beukelman, D. R., & Garrett, K. L. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired severe communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 4, 104–121.
  • Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1989). Augmentative and alternative communication application for persons with severe acquired communication disorders: An introduction. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 5,42–48.
  • Bloomberg, K., & Johnson, H. (1990). A statewide demographic survey of people with severe communication impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,182–183.
  • Daner, J., & Drummond, S. S. (1985). Communication problems of the elderly: A survey. Nursing Homes, 34, 26–29.
  • Enderby, P. M. (1989). The epidemiology of communication dis-orders. In M. M. Leahy (Ed.), Disorders of communication: The science of intervention (pp. 39–52). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Fein, D. J. (1983). The prevalence of speech and language impairments. Asha, 25, 37.
  • Forbes, W. F., Hayward, L. M., & Agwani, N. (1991). Factors associated with the prevalence of various self-reported impair-ments among older people residing in the community. Cana-dian Journal of Public Health, 82, 240–244.
  • Fozard, J. (1990). Vision and hearing. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 150–170). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • George, L. K., & Landerman, R. (1984). Health and subjective well-being: A replicated secondary data analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19, 133–156.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In L. Samuel (Ed.), Social networks: A developing paradigm (pp. 347–367). New York: Academic Press.
  • Hirdes, J. P., Pearson Hirdes, B., & Sharratt, J. (1992). The prevalence of grasping disorders and the use of microcomput-ers as adaptive writing aids among older adults. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 5,63–78.
  • Jacobs-Condit, L. (1985). Implications of physical, psychological, and social changes of aging for communication. In L. Jacobs-Condit (Ed.), Gerontology and communication disorders. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Associa-tion.
  • Ladtkow, M. C., & Culp, D. M. (1992). Augmentative communica-tion with traumatic brain injury. In K. M. Yorkston (Ed.), Aug-mentative communication in the medical setting (pp. 139–189). Tucson, AZ: Communication Skills Builders.
  • Lee, K. S., & Jay, T. D. (1990). Control of computer-based technology for people with physical disabilities. Toronto: Uni-versity of Toronto Press.
  • Martin, A. D. (1984). Language problems in the elderly. In C. N. Wilder & B. E. Weinstein (Eds.), Aging and communication: Problems in management(pp. 31–40). New York: The Haworth Press.
  • Matas, J. A., Mathy-Laikko, P., Beukelman, D. R., & Legrosley, K. (1985). Identifying the non-speaking population: A demo-graphic study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 17–31.
  • Mitsuda, P. M., Baarslag-Benson, R., Hazel, K., & Therriault, T. M. (1992). Augmentative communication in intensive and acute care unit settings. In K. M. Yorkston (Ed.), Augmentative communication in the medical setting (pp. 5–58). Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
  • McPherson, B. D. (1990). Aging as a social process (2nd ed.). Toronto: Butterworths.
  • Sorin-Peters, R., Tse, S., & Kapelus, G. (1989). Communication screening program for a geriatric continuing care unit. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Association, 13, 63–70.
  • Statistics Canada. (1989). The health and activity limitation sur-vey: Microdata user's guide, adults in households. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
  • Statistics Canada. (1990). The health and activity limitation sur-vey: Microdata user's guide, adults in institutions. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
  • Wong, C. H. (1992). Use of weights in sample surveys. Public Health and Epidemiology Report Ontario, 3,230–232.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.