References
- Green, B. G., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1986). Perception of synthetic speech produced automatically by rule: Intelligibility of eight text-to-speech systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 100–107.
- Higginbotham, J., & Drazek, A. (1991). Speech output. Commu-nicating Together, 9, 11–13.
- Hoover, J., Reichle, J., van Tassel, D., & Cole, D. (1987). The intelligibility of synthesized speech: Echo ll versus Votrax. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 425–431.
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (1969). Recommended practice for speech quality measurements. (IEEE No. 297). New York: IEEE.
- Keating, D. L., Evans, A. L., Wyper, D. J., & Cunningham, E. (1986). A comparison of the intelligibility of some low cost speech synthesis devices. British Journal of Disorders of Com-munication, 21, 167–172.
- Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,120–128.
- Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1990). A comparison of intelli-gibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 6,61–68.
- Mitchell, P. R., & Atkins, C. P. (1989). A comparison of the single word intelligibility of two voice output communication aids. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,84–88.
- Pisoni, D. (1987). Some measure of intelligibility and comprehen-sion. In J. Allen, M. S. Hunnicut, & D. Klatt (Eds.), From text to speech: The MI TALK system (pp. 151–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Quist, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (1992). Assistive communication devices: Call for specifications. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 312–317.
- Raghavendra, P., & Allen, G. D. (1993). Comprehension of syn-thetic speech with three text-to-speech systems using a sentence verification paradigm. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,126–133.
- Schwab, E. C., Nusbaum, H. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1983). Some effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech. (Progress Report No. 9). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory.
- Venkatagiri, H. S. (1991). Effects of rate and pitch variations on the intelligibility of synthesized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7,284–289.
- Wolf, S., & Mizuko, M. (1992, November). The intelligibility of synthesized speech: Monosyllabic words versus bisyllabic words. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Antonio, TX.