Analysis of listeners' summaries of synthesized speech passages

References

• Alm, N. (1993). The development of augmentative and alternative communication systems to assist with social communication. Technology and Disability, 2,1–18.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. (1969). Specifications for audiometers. (ANSI 53.6-1969). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, A. (1987). Communication in the backchannel: Social struc-tural analysis of nonspeech/speech conversations. Disserta-tion Abstracts International, 47, 3237A. (University Microfilms No. DA 862967A).
   Google Scholar
• Damico, J., Maxwell, M., & Kovarsky, D. (Eds.). (1990). Ethno-graphic inquiries into communication sciences and disorders. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 13(1).
   Google Scholar
• Drazek, A. L. (1992). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech by naive versus experienced listeners. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buf-falo, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1992). Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: A review and theoretical interpreta-tion. Language and Speech, 35,351–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (1987). Speech comprehension and lexical failure. In R. Reilly (Ed.), Communication failure in dialogue and dis- course: Detection and repair processes (pp. 81–98). New York: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Drazek, A. L., Kowarsky, K., Scally, C., & Segal, E. (1994). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation rates. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 10(3), 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Drazek, A., & Sussman, J. (1995). The effect of experience on the single-word intelligibility and dis-course comprehension of synthetic speech. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Lubinski, R. L. & Rotella, R. (1995). Com-prehension of synthetic speech by well-elderly persons. Manu-script submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Scally, C., & Lundy, D., & Kowarsky, K. (1995). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech across three augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) out-put methods. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. Manu-script accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Lundy, D. C., & Scally, C. (1993). Qualita-tive ratings of discourse summaries: Definitions and proce-dure manual. Unpublished manuscript, Communication and Assistive Device Laboratory, State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. E. (1988). Studying conversations of augmentative communication sys-tem users. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 206–248). Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Hosenfeld, C., Duchan, J. F., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Deixis in persuasive texts written by bilinguals of differing degrees of expertise. In J. F. Duchan, G. Bruder, & L. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science project. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse compre-hension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Re-view, 95,163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmen-tative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P. (1992). Comprehension of augmentative and alternative communication device output methods. Unpub-lished dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madi-son, Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, M. (1990). Authenticity of ethnographic research. Jour-nal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 13(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., Ralston, J. V., & Lively, S. E. (1990). Some new directions in research on comprehension of synthetic speech. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 16. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., & Allen, G. D. (1993). Comprehension of syn-thetic speech with three text-to-speech systems using a sen-tence verification paradigm. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,126–133.
   Google Scholar
• Sabin, L., & Donnellan, A. (1993). A qualitative study of the process of facilitated communication. Journal of the Associa-tion for People with Severe Handicaps, 18(3), 200–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scally, C. (1993). The effect of voice output method on VOCA mediated social interaction. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, E., Duchan, J., & Scott, P. (1991). The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults' interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes, 14, 27–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative behav-ioral observation data. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sweidel, G. B. (1992). Management strategies in the communi-cation of speaking persons and persons with a speech dis-ability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 195–214.
   Google Scholar