Synthetic speech intelligibility under several experimental conditions

References

• Alm, N. (1993). The development of augmentative and alternative communication systems to assist with social communication. Technology and Disability, 2,1–18.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. (1969). Specifications for audiometers. (ANSI 53.6-1969). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, A. (1987). Communication in the backchannel: Social struc-tural analysis of nonspeech/speech conversations. Disserta-tion Abstracts International, 47, 3237A. (University Microfilms No. DA 862967A).
   Google Scholar
• Damico, J., Maxwell, M., & Kovarsky, D. (Eds.). (1990). Ethno-graphic inquiries into communication sciences and disorders. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 13(1).
   Google Scholar
• Drazek, A. L. (1992). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech by naive versus experienced listeners. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buf-falo, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1992). Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: A review and theoretical interpreta-tion. Language and Speech, 35,351–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (1987). Speech comprehension and lexical failure. In R. Reilly (Ed.), Communication failure in dialogue and dis- course: Detection and repair processes (pp. 81–98). New York: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Drazek, A. L., Kowarsky, K., Scally, C., & Segal, E. (1994). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation rates. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 10(3), 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Drazek, A., & Sussman, J. (1995). The effect of experience on the single-word intelligibility and dis-course comprehension of synthetic speech. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Lubinski, R. L. & Rotella, R. (1995). Com-prehension of synthetic speech by well-elderly persons. Manu-script submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Scally, C., & Lundy, D., & Kowarsky, K. (1995). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech across three augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) out-put methods. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. Manu-script accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Lundy, D. C., & Scally, C. (1993). Qualita-tive ratings of discourse summaries: Definitions and proce-dure manual. Unpublished manuscript, Communication and Assistive Device Laboratory, State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. E. (1988). Studying conversations of augmentative communication sys-tem users. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 206–248). Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Hosenfeld, C., Duchan, J. F., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Deixis in persuasive texts written by bilinguals of differing degrees of expertise. In J. F. Duchan, G. Bruder, & L. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science project. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse compre-hension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Re-view, 95,163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess, F., & Humes, L. E. (1995). Audiology: The fundamentals. (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1979). The relationship between information transfer and speech intelligibility of dysarthric speakers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 12, 189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckert, E. (1984). A new text-to-speech product produces dy-namic human-quality voice. Speech Technology, 2,114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. E. (1983). Intelligibility comparisons for two synthetic and one natural speech source. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. D. N. (1991). Speech synthesis: Technology for disabled people. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, G. (1960). Voice and articulation drillbook. (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, C., & Kraat, A. (1985). Technology as a tool for conversation and language learning for the physically dis-abled. Topics in Language Disorders, 6,56–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, J., Reichle, J., VanTasell, D., & Cole, D. (1987). The intelligibility of synthetic speech: Echo II vs. Votrax. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalikow, D. N., & Stevens, K. N. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, K. A., & Allen, G. D. (1990). Intelligibility of synthetic speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55,751–755.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, H. D., Benignus, V. A., Muller, K. E., Malott, C. M., & Barton, C. N. (1988). Babble and random-noise masking of speech in high and low context cue conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 108–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Logan, J. S., Greene, B. G., & Pisoni, D.B. (1989). Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 566–581.
   Google Scholar
• Marics, M. A., & Williges, B. H. (1988). The intelligibility of synthesized speech in data inquiry systems. Human Factors, 30, 719–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D.R. (1990). A comparison of intelli-gibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 6,61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P. R., & Adkins, C. P. (1989). A comparison of single word intelligibility of two voice output communication aids. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, H. A., & Popelka, G. R. (1992). Audiology. (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., Nusbaum, H. C., & Greene, B. G. (1985). Perception of synthetic speech generated by rule. Proceedings of the IEEE, 73,1665–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, R. L. (1987). Quantifying the performance of text-to-speech synthesizers. Speech Technology, 3,54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1984). Technology needs of individuals with communication impairments. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5,59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Yuchtman, M., Nusbaum, H., & Pisoni, D. (1985). Consonant confusions and perceptual spaces for natural and synthetic speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, (Suppl. 1), S83.
   Google Scholar