Approaching literacy with AAC graphics

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge: MIT Press. Berninger, V. W., & Gans, B. M. (1986a). Assessing word pro- cessing capability of the nonvocal, nonwriting. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Gans, B. M. (1986b). Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Freeman, N. H. (1995). Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expres-sive phonological impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 446–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (1985). Spelling ability in congenital dysarthria: Evidence against articulatory coding in translating between phonemes and graphemes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 229–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., & Robson, J. (1989). Accurate non-word spell-ing despite congenital inability to speak: Phoneme-grapheme conversion does not require subvocal articulation. British Jour-nal of Psychology, 80, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, K., Rankin, J., & Mirenda, P. (1994). Impact of graphic symbol use on reading acquisition. Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, 10, 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., & Cassatt-James, E. L. (1988). Augmentative communication. In N. J. Lass, L. V. McReynolds, J. L. North-ern, & D. E. Yoder (Eds.), Handbook of speech-language pathology audiology (pp. 986–1013) Toronto: B. C. Decker.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, T. (1977). The perceptual world of the child. Glasgow: Fontana/Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (1992). Studies in the acquisition procedure for reading: Rationale, hypotheses, and data. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 1–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B., & Carroll, M. (1989). Learning artificial orthographies: Further evidence of a nonanalytic acquisition procedure. Mem-ory and Cognition, 17, 311–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1984). Picsyms categorical dictionary. Lawrence, KS: Baggeboda Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1991). DynaSyms manual and user's guide. Pitts-burgh, PA: Sentient Systems Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R., & Bereiter, C. (1984). From behaviourism to cognitive behaviourism to cognitive development: Steps in the evolution of instructional design. Instructional Science, 13, 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. R. (1981). Learning words using traditional orthography and the symbols of Rebus, Bliss, and Carrier. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46,191–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman, P. (1991, October). Literacy in AAC. Presentation at the Third Biennial State of the Art Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Crossroads Conference on Communicative Disorders, Purdue University, West La-fayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychol-ogy, 50, 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. S. (1989). The development of representation in young children. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child devel- opment and behavior. (pp. 2–39). Vol. 22. San Diego: Aca-demic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 311–338). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In J. Downing & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119–147). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1989). Movement into word reading and spelling: How spelling contributes to reading. In J. Mason (Ed.), Reading and writing connections (pp. 65–81). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume II (pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1987a). Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words? Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1987b). Cipher versus cue reading: An experiment in decoding acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79,3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, B. E. (1993). The development of literacy in individuals with severe congenital speech and motor impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 13 (2), 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, B. E., & Davis, G. A. (1990). Phonological recoding and congenital dysarthria: Implications for intervention [abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,133.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K.E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Sur-face dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R. (1987). Effects of translucency and complexity on the associative learning of Blissymbols by cognitively normal children and adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, C. A. (1983). The relative iconicity and leamability of verb referents differentially represented as manual signs, Blissymbolics, and Rebus symbols: An investigation with mod-erately retarded individuals. Unpublished doctoral disserta-tion, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 180–196. Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, J., & Lloyd, L. L. (1986). An investigation of the element explanation on the ability of preschool children to learn Blissymbols. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Huba, M. E. (1984). The relationship between linguistic aware-ness in prereaders and two types of experimental instruction. Reading World, 23, 347–363.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, B. (1990). Acquisition of reading and writing. A neuro-linguistic approach [abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,132.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, B., & Jennische, M. (1991, October). Clinical neurolin-guistics and its implications for reading/writing of symbols. Paper presented at the AAC Think Tank Conference, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katims, D. S. (1991). Emergent literacy in early childhood special education: Curriculum and instruction. Topics in Early Child-hood Special Education, 11, 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, D. P. (1990). Charting pathways to the development of expertise. Educational Psychologist, 25, 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelford Smith, A., Thurston, S., Light, J., Parnes, P., & O'Keefe, B. (1989). The form and use of written communication pro-duced by physically disabled individuals using microcomput-ers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• King-DeBaun, P. (1989). Storytime. Acworth, GA: Pati King-De-Baun.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A. (1991, October). Literacy in AAC. Presenta-tion at the Third Biennial State of the Art Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Crossroads Conference on Communicative Disorders, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M. (1983). Ghosts in the mind's machine. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Binger, C., & Kelford Smith, A. (1994). Story reading interactions between preschoolers who use AAC and their mothers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 225–268.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Kelford Smith, A. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and of their nondisabled peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmenta-tive and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 7,186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1990). On the communication process: Speaker-listener interaction and the development of speech. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 6,220–230.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed su-perordinate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 2, 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A., Jr. (1985a). An initial investigation of translucency, transparency, and component complexity of Blissymbolics. Journal of Childhood Communication Disor-ders, 8, 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A., Jr. (1985b). An investigation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandi-capped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I. (1992). Two dimensions of decontextualization in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1980). When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old children's letter and word reading competen-cies. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 203–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and bio-logical models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, E. T. (1980). Teaching and using Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, E. T., & Schultz, A. (1973). Communication boards for cerebral palsied children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Dis-orders, 38, 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1985). Communicating with Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1992a). Parents and symbols: Charting the language pathway together. Communicating Together, 10 (2), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1992b). Independence along the developmen-tal pathway. Communicating Together, 10 (3), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1993). Graphic representational systems and literacy learning. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(2), 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineo, B. (1991). Picture-based language representation: An analysis of the abilities of two young adults with severe mental retardation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., & Ruscello, D. M. (1984). Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. W. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language com-petence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., & Begg, I. (1981). Psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, P. L. & McWilliam, P. J. (1993). Emerging literacy and children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): Issues and possible intervention strategies. Topics in Lan-guage Disorders, 13, 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P. (1990). The effects of enhancements on learn-ing and using Blissymbols of normal three-year-old children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., & Fristoe, M. (1988). Standard and enhanced Blissymbols: Responses by Indian and U.S. children [abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 146.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., & Fristoe, M. (1990). "a spinach with a V on it": What three-year-old children see in standard and enhanced Blissymbols. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, J. L., Harwood, K., & Mirenda, P. (1994). Influence of graphic symbol use on reading comprehension. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1993). Roles of graphic symbols in concept formation by AAC users. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1993). Effects of initial element teaching in a story-telling context on Blissymbol acquisition and generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36,979–995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psy-chological Review, 96,523–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the augmented language acquisition pro-cess for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 7, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, P. H. K., & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading without phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3,1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1986). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, H., McNaughton, S., & Kates, B. (1978). Handbook of Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Insti-tute.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (1992). Reading abilities of nonspeaking students: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 8, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (1991). Diverse conversational contexts for the acquisition of various language skills. In J. Miller (Ed.), Re-search on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 105–124). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Word recognition: Changing perspec-tives. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume II (pp. 418–452). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and conse-quences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Steelman, J. D., Pierce, P. L., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (1993). The role of computers in promoting literacy in children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSP). Topics in Language Disorders, 13(2), 76–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sulzby, E. (1989). Assessment of writing and of children's lan-guage while writing. In L. Morrow & J. Smith (Eds.), The role of assessment and measurement in early literacy instruction (pp. 83–109). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sulzby, E., & Teale, W. (1991). Emergent literacy. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume ll (pp. 727–757). New York: Long-man.
   Google Scholar
• Turnure, J. E. (1986). Instruction and cognitive development: Coordinating communication and cues. Exceptional Children, 53, 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. C. (1990). AAC users and the development of word recognition and spelling [abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,133.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. C. (1992). Phonological recoding and phonological analytical skill in early literacy learning: A devel-opmental approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-versity of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Vicker, B. (1974). Non-oral communication system project, 1964-1973, Iowa University Hospital School. Iowa: University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willows, D. M. (1991). A "normal variation" view of written lan-guage difficulties and disabilities: Implications for whole lan-guage programs. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1, 73–103.
   Google Scholar
• Willows, D. M. (1995a, in press). A framework for understanding learning difficulties and disabilities. In R. P. Garzia (Ed.), Vision and reading. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Willows, D. M. (1995b, in press). Assessment and programming for reading and writing difficulties. In R. P. Garzia (Ed.), Vision and Reading. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., & Treiman, R. (1990). Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: Onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. (1992). Blissymbol reference guide. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication International.
   Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W. S., & Young, T. A. (1988). The effects of repre-sentativeness and concreteness on the "guessability" of Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., & Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.
   Google Scholar