Nomenclature of category levels in graphic symbols, Part II: role of similarity in categorization

References

• Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Impli-cations for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101–140). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Structure, flexibility, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29–101). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In D. Morehead & A. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 99–179). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M. (1989). Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? In M. Rice & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), The teachability of language (pp. 133–169). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, L. R. (1978). Non-analytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 169–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, L. R. (1987). Decentralized control of categorization: The role of prior processing episodes. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 141–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1956). Language and categories. In J. S. Bruner, J . J. Goodnow, & G. A. Austin (Eds.), A study of thinking (pp. 247–322). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N. L., Brown, R. M., & Robinson, H. B. (1988). Basic-level categorization in preschoolers, school-age children, and col-lege students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 149, 239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan, M. A. (1985). How parents label objects for young chil-dren: The role of input in the acquisition of category hierarchies. Child Development, 56,508–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1991). Acquisitional principles in lexical development. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on lan-guage and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 31–71). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corter, J. E. (1986). Relevant features and statistical models of generalization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9,653-654. Estes, W. K. (1986). Array models for category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fivush, R. (1987). Scripts and categories: Interrelationships in development. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categoriza-tion (pp. 201–233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in two-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 26, 796–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1991). Language and categoriza-tion: The acquisition of natural kind terms. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Inter-relations in development (pp. 146–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induc-tion in young children. Cognition, 23, 183–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Young children's induc-tions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appear-ances. Child Development, 58, 1532–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 225–277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, S., & Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC sys-tems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamad, S. (1987). Category induction and representation. In S. Hamad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cog-nition (pp. 535–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hock, H. S., Tromley, C., & Polmann, L. (1988). Perceptual units in the acquisition of visual categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, H. S., Webb, E., & Cavedo, L. C. (1987). Perceptual learning in visual category acquisition. Memory and Cognition, 15, 544–556.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Homa, D., Rhoads, D., & Chambliss, D. (1979). Evolution of con-ceptual structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. A. (1992). Individual language learning styles and aug-mentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur, P., & Besner, D. (1987). Additivity and interaction between size ratio and response category in the comparison of size-discrepant shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 478–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. M. (1994). The Picture Communication Symbols-Combination book. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (1987). Conceptual development and category structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 175–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds and development. Cambridge: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987a). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What cate-gories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987b). Cognitive models and prototype theory. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecolog-ical and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 63–100). Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebowitz, M. (1986). When explanation is too hard (or understanding hijacking for novices). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9,662–663.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1990). The role of iconicity in aug-mentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. I. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Low, L. A. (1988). Effects of contextual composition of category tri-ads on semantic interrelatedness among members. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 403–406.
   Google Scholar
• Luciarello, J., & Nelson, K. (1985). Slot-filler categories as mem-ory organizers for young children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 272–282.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, E. (1982). Teaching and using Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1985). Communicating with Blissymbols. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1989). Teaching and learning Bliss. Communi-cating Together, 7,12–13.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1993). Graphic representational systems and lit-eracy learning. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., & Lindsay, P. (1995). Approaching literacy with AAC graphics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 212–228.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44,1469–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classifi-cation learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Wattenmaker, W. D. (1987). Category cohesiveness, theories, and cognitive archeology. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and concept development: Ecological and intellectual factors in cat-egorization (pp. 25–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B. (1987). Child-basic object categories and early lexi-cal development. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categoriza-tion (pp. 201–233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Crisafi, M. A. (1982). Order of acquisition of sub-ordinate-, basic-, and superordinate-level categories. Child Development, 53,258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., & Smith, E. E. (1982). Basic-level superiority in pic-ture categorization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense: The acquisition of shared mean-ing. Orlando, FL: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language compe-tence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychol-ogy: General, 115, 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Exemplar-based approach to relating cate-gorization, identification, and recognition. Journal of Experimen-tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 282–304.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract idea. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77,353–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankin, J. L., Harwood, K., & Mirenda, P. (1994). Influence of graphic symbol use on reading comprehension. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadu & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity, analogy, and thought (pp. 21–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1992). Developing augmented lan-guage in children with severe mental retardation. In S. F. War-ren & J. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 113–130). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psy-chology, 8, 382–439.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., Collins, G. C., & Hunter, L. E. (1986). Transcend-ing inductive category formation in learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9,639–651.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1997). Nomenclature of category levels in graphic symbols, Part I: Is a flower a flower a flower? Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 13, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Belfiore, P. J., Nigam, R., Blischak, D., & Het-zroni, 0. (1995). The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Journal of Applied Behavior Analy-sis, 28, 537–549.
   Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Fraisse, R. (1968). Le temps de reaction verbale, Ill. Responses specifiques et responses categorielles a des stim-ulus objets. LAnnee Psychologique, 68, 69–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7,161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., Balzano, G. J., & Walker, J. H. (1978). Nominal, per-ceptual, and semantic codes in picture categorization. In J. Cot-ton & R. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cam-bridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & McCullough, B. (1986). The role of visual sim-ilarity in picture categorization. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (1991). Diverse conversational contexts for the acqui-sition of language skills. In J. E. Miller (Ed.), Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 105–124). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, R. D., Davies, D., Merrill, E. C., & McCauley, C. (1982). Cross-category differences in the processing of subordinate-superordinate relationships. Child Development, 53,1249–1253.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R. (1990). Linguistic biases and the establishment of conceptual hierarchies: Evidence from preschool children. Cog-nitive Development, 5,123–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R. (1991). Convergences between semantic and con-ceptual organization in the preschool years. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 107–145). New York: Cam-bridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. A. (Eds.) (1992). Blissymbol refer-ence guide. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication International.
   Google Scholar