Initial study into the effects of translucency and complexity on the learning of Blissymbols by children and adults with normal cognitive abilities

References

• American National Standards Institute. (1969). American national standard specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1969). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. (1976). Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In S. R. Hamad (Ed.), Origins and evolution of lan-guage and speech. Vol. 280, (pp. 514–538). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G.R., & Lloyd, L.L. (1990). The compara-tive translucency of initial lexical items represented by five graphic symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, R. (1977, June). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Keynote address presented at the National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1978). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Part two. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 32, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. E., & Lloyd, L. L. (1983, May). The effects of produc-tion mode, translucency, and manuality on sign acquisition by retarded adults. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Confer-ence of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Dallas.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test: Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1977, March). The use of manual com-munication with the retarded. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Gatlinburg Conference on Research in Mental Retarda-tion and Developmental Disabilities, Gatlinburg, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1979). Nonspeech communication. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 401–430). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R. (1985). A response to Luftig and Bersani: An investi-gation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 1, 122–123.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1987). A study of physical and seman-tic characteristics of a graphic symbol system as predictors of perceived complexity. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 3, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. A. (1984). The relative iconicity and learnability of verb referents differentially represented as manual signs, Blis-symbolics, and Rebus symbols: An investigation with moder-ately retarded individuals. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue Uni-versity, 1983.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 809A.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, P. L., & Robinson, J. H. (1980). Influence of iconicity and phonological similarity on sign learning by mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 291–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hehner, B. (1980). Blissymbols for use. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantareas, M. M., Oxman, J., & Webster, C. D. (1978). Iconic-ity: Effects on the acquisition of sign language by autistic and other severely dysfunctional children. In P. Siple (Ed.), Under-standing language through sign language research (pp. 213–237). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present- day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Karlan, G. R., & Nail-Chiwetalu, B. (1994). Translu- cency values for 910 Blissymbols. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L. (1983). Manual sign translucency and referential concrete-ness in the sign learning of moderately/severely mentally retarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A. (1985a). An initial investigation of the effects of translucency, transparency, and component com-plexity of Blissymbolics. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 8, 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A., Jr. (1985b). An investigation of two vari-ables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (1981). Manual sign translucency and referential concreteness in the learning of signs. Sign Language Studies, 30, 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, M. (1977). Iconicity of signs and their leamability by non-signers. Paper presented to the National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Training, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., & Kates, B. (1980). The application of Blissym-bolics. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication: Analysis and intervention (pp. 303–321). Balti-more: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M. I. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbolics, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., Yuille, J. D., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76,1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polzer, K. R., Wankoff, L. L., & Wollner, S. G. (1979, April). The acquisition of arbitrary and iconic signs: Imitation versus com-prehension. Paper presented at the New York State Speech and Hearing Association, Ellenville, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., & Fristoe, M. (1990). "A spinach with a 'V on it": What 3-year-olds see in standard and enhanced Blissymbols. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 149–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Reumann, R. (1986). Effects of Blissymbol element configuration on the matching behavior of mentally retarded individuals. Unpublished manuscript, Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder-McLean, L. (1978, November). Functional stimulus and response variables in sign training with retarded subjects. Paper presented at the 53rd Annual Convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W. S., & Paivio, A. (1980). Cognitive processing of Bliss-like symbols by normal populations: A report on four studies. Proceedings of the European Association for Special Education, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar