Exploring College Students’ Use of General and Alcohol-Related Social Media and Their Associations With Alcohol-Related Behaviors

REFERENCES

• Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2011: Volume II, College Students and Adults Ages 19–50. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Core Institute. Executive Summary 2006–2008 Annual Data: CORE Alcohol and Drug Study Long Form. Carbondale, IL: Core Institute; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez VM. Association of solitary binge drinking and suicidal behavior among emerging adult college students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26:609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parada M, Corral M, Mota N, Crego A, Holguín SR, Cadaveira F. Executive functioning and alcohol binge drinking in university students. Addict Behav. 2012;37:167–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M, Wechsler H. Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24: changes from 1998 to 2001. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:259–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley PM, Johnston LD. Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002;63(suppl 14):23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson P, de Bruijn A, Angus K, Gordon R, Hastings G. Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44:229–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Grube JW. TV beer and soft drink advertising: what young people like and what effects? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:900–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester J, Montgomery K, Dorfman L. Alcohol marketing in the digital age. Center for Digital Democracy & Berkeley Media Studies Group. Available at: www.ftc.gov/os/…/alcoholstudy2011-pra/00014-58260.pdf. Published 2010. Accessed June 7, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mart S, Mergendoller J, Simon M. Alcohol promotion on Facebook. J Global Drug Policy Pract. 2009;3(3):3–10. . Available at: http://globaldrugpolicy.org/Issues/Vol%203%20Issue%203/Journalof;GlobablDrugPolicyVol3Issue3.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed September 23, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zickuhr K. Generations and their gadgets. Pew Internet & American Life Project. . Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Generations-and-gadgets.aspx. Published 2011. Accessed October 2, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. . Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports /2010 /SocialMedia -and -Young -Adults.aspx. Published 2010. Accessed September 8, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno MA, Briner LR, Williams A, Brockman L, Walker L, Christakis DA. A content analysis of displayed alcohol references on a social networking website. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47:168–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffer H, Dave D. Alcohol advertising and alcohol consumption by adolescents. Health Econ. 2006;15:617–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugan L. Once banned, alcohol brands are now buying ads on twitter. Twitter Marketing. . Available at: http://www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/once-banned-alcohol-brands-are-now-buying-ads-on-twitter_b8046. Accessed March 27, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SA, McGue M, Maggs J, et al. A developmental perspective on alcohol and youths 16 to 20 years of age. Pediatrics. 2008;121:S290–S310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken PP, Eadie DR, Leather DS, McNeill REJ, Scott AC. Television advertisements for alcoholic drinks do reinforce under-age drinking. Br J Addict. 1988;83:1399–1419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Austin EW, Chen MJ, Grube JW. How does alcohol advertising influence underage drinking? The role of desirability, identification and skepticism. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:376–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyllie A, Zhang JF, Casswell S. Positive responses to televised beer advertisements associated with drinking and problems reported by 18 to 29-year-olds. Addiction. 1998;93:749–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder LB, Milici FF, Slater M, Sun H, Strizhakova Y. Effects of alcohol advertising exposure on drinking among youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher KJ, Rutledge PC. Heavy drinking across the transition to college: predicting first-semester heavy drinking from precollege variables. Addict Behav. 2006;32:819–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin EW, Pinkleton BE, Hust SJT, Miller AC. The locus of message meaning: differences between trained coders and untrained message recipients in the analysis of alcoholic beverage advertising. Commun Methods Measures. 2007;1:91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky JL. Conceptualizing involvement. J Advert. 1986;15:4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky JL. The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. J Advert. 1994;23:59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews JC, Durvasula S, Akhter SH. A framework for conceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct in advertising research in advertising research. J Advert. 1990;19:27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratkanis AR, Greenwald AG. Consumer involvement, message attention, and the persistence of persuasive impact in a message-dense environment. Psychol Market. 1993;10:321–332.
   Google Scholar
• Roser C. Involvement, attention, and perceptions of message relevance in the response to persuasive appeals. Commun Res. 1990;17:571–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celsi RL, Olson JC. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. J Consum Res. 1988;15:210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Leavitt C. Audience involvement in advertising: four levels. J Consum Res. 1984;11:581–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvin CD. Social norms and motivations associated with college binge drinking. Sociol Inquiry. 2012;82:257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins HW, Haines MP, Rice RM. Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms, and student alcohol misuse. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66:470–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira MT, Smith LA, Foxcroft D. Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in university and college students. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;. 8(3):. CD006748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt T. The Whuffie Factor: Using the Power of Social Networks to Build Your Business. New York, NY: Crown Business; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Weber L. Sticks and Stones: How Digital Business Reputations Are Created Over Time and Lost in a Click. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Austin EW, Pinkleton BE, Fujioka Y. Assessing prosocial message effectiveness: effects of message quality, production quality, and persuasiveness. J Health Commun. 1999;4:195–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Fujioka Y. The relationship of beer ad and PSA quality to high school students’ alcohol-related beliefs and behaviors. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2001;45:575–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Van de Vord R. The role of realism, similarity, and expectancies in adolescents’ interpretation of abuse-prevention messages. Health Commun. 2010;25:258–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin EW, Pinkleton BE, Fujioka Y. The role of interpretation processes and parental discussion in the media's effects on adolescents’ use of alcohol. Pediatrics. 2000;105:343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Chen Y, Cohen M. Assessing effects of a media literacy-based intervention on US adolescents’ responses to and interpretations of sexual media messages. J Child Media. 2013;7:463–479.
   Google Scholar
• Austin EW, Pinkleton BE, Funabiki RP. The desirability paradox in the effects of media literacy training. Commun Res. 2007;34:483–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar