Trends in long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use, LARC use predictors, and dual-method use among a national sample of college women

References

• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020. 2014. Available at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/ Accessed August 12, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United states, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):843–852. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper CC, Rocca CH, Thompson KM, Morfesis J, Goodman S, Darney PD, Westhoff CL, Speidel JJ. Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: A cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):562–568. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62460-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Hubacher D, Kost K, Finer LB. Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(6):1349–1357. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c47c9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison LF, Sieving RE, Pettingell SL, Hellerstedt WL, McMorris BJ, Bearinger LH. Protective factors, risk indicators, and contraceptive consistency among college women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016;45(2):155–165. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KS, Ela E, Zochowski MK, Caldwell A, Moniz M, McAndrew L, Steel M, Challa S, Dalton VK, Ernst S. “I don't know enough to feel comfortable using them:” Women's knowledge of and perceived barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus. Contraception. 2016;93(6):556–564. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng SCJ, Van Leuven KA. Intrauterine contraception and the facts for college health. J Nurse Pract. 2015;11(4):417–423. doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2014.10.029.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey AR, Billingsley CC, Savage AH, Korte JE. Predictors of long-acting reversible contraception use among unmarried young adults. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):526.e1–526.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodsong C, Shedlin M, Koo H. The “natural” body, God and contraceptive use in the southeastern United States. Cult Health Sex. 2004;6(1):61–78. doi:10.1080/13691050310001611165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manlove J, Terry-Humen E. Contraceptive use patterns within emales' first sexual relationships: The role of relationships, partners, and methods. J Sex Res. 2007;44(1):3–16. doi:10.1080/00224490709336788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost JJ, Darroch JE. Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(2):94–104. doi:10.1363/4009408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal P, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):121–137. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaydos LM, Neubert BD, Hogue CJ, Kramer MR, Yang Z. Racial disparities in contraceptive use between student and nonstudent populations. J Women's Health. 2010;19(3):589–595. doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. American college health association-national college health assessment II: Reference group executive summary Fall 2015. Hanover, MD; American College Health Association: 2016. http://www.acha-ncha.org/
   Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women Aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Natl Health Stat Report. 2015;(86):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Contraceptive use in the United States. 2015. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.pdf Accessed February 23, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):e1257–e1281. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):184–196. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f05e.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Espey E, Ogburn T. Long-acting reversible contraceptives: Intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):705–719. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ce2f0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, Secura G. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(5):1105–1113. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821188ad.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubacher D, Finer LB, Espey E. Renewed interest in intrauterine contraception in the United States: Evidence and explanation. Contraception. 2011;83(4):291–294. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Finer LB. Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. women, 2009–2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):1. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, MacAluso M, Frost J, Anderson JE, Curtis K, Grosse SD. Characteristics of users of intrauterine devices and other reversible contraceptive methods in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1138–1144. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker AK, Dude AM, Neustadt A, Gilliam ML. Correlates of use of long-acting reversible methods of contraception among adolescent and young adult women. Contraception. 2010;81(4):299–303. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker AK, Sisco KM, Tomlinson AN, Dude AM, Martins SL. Use of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(3):401–406. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner RJ, Liddon N, Swartzendruber AL, Rasberry CN, Sales JM. Long-acting reversible contraception and condom use among female US high school students. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(5):428–434. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cates W, Steiner MJ. Dual protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. What is the best contraceptive approach? Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(3):168–174. doi:10.1097/00007435-200203000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier A. Should healthcare professionals be advocating long-acting reversible contraception? Womens Health. 2009;5(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh JL, Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Dual method use among a sample of first-year college women. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(2):73–81. doi:10.1363/46e1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RL, Fortenberry JD. Dual use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and condoms among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4 SUPPL.):S29–S34. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg DL, Allsworth JE, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Correlates of dual-method contraceptive use: An analysis of the national survey of family growth (2006–2008). Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296176/pdf/IDOG2012-717163.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of education statistics, 2014 (NCES 2016-006). Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/. Published 2016, Accessed August 13, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. American college health association-national college health assessment. 2014. Available at: http://www.acha-ncha.org/. Accessed August 13, 2016].
   Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. National college health assessment: Reliability and validity analyses, 2000. Baltimore, MD; American College Health Association: 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the U.S., 2007–2009. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):893–897. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Foster DG, de Bocanegra HT, Brindis C, Bradsberry M, Darney P. Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001–2007. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43(3):181–7. doi:10.1363/4318111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Foster DG, de Bocanegra HT, Brindis C, Bradsberry M, Darney P. Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: Methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001–2007. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43(3):181–187. doi:10.1363/4318111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branum AM, Jones J. Trends in long-acting reversible contraception use among U.S. women aged 15–44. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;(188):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson AV, Karasek D, Dehlendorf C, Foster DG Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2016;93(5):406–411. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Rodriguez MI, Levy K, Borrero S, Steinauer J. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):214–220. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattray C, Wiener J, Legardy-Williams J, et al. Effects of initiating a contraceptive implant on subsequent condom use: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2015;92(6):560–566. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost JJ, Darroch JE, Remez L. Improving contraceptive use in the United States. Guttmacher In Brief. 2008;(1):1–8.43.
   Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Diedrich J, Drey E, Postone A, Steinauer J. Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;8(3):343–348. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.021.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JA. Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception. 2014;89(4):237–241. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold RB. Guarding against coercion while ensuring access: A delicate balance. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2014;17(3):8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(3):171–5. doi:10.1363/46e1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar