Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of American College Health Volume 66, 2018 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
291
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Using smartphones to collect daily sexual behavior data from college students

Malachi WillisDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
, MA &
Kristen N. JozkowskiDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA;The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USAView further author information
, PhD
Pages 529-532 | Received 03 Aug 2017, Accepted 11 Feb 2018, Published online: 06 Apr 2018

References

  • McCallum EB, Peterson ZD. Investigating the impact of inquiry mode on self-reported sexual behavior: theoretical considerations and review of the literature. J Sex Res. 2012;49(2–3):212–226. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.658923. PMID: 22380589.
  • Schrimshaw EW, Rosario M, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL, Scharf-Matlick AA. Test–retest reliability of self-reported sexual behavior, sexual orientation, and psychosexual milestones among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(2):220–229. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9006-2.
  • Vannier SA, O'Sullivan LF. The feasibility and acceptability of handheld computers in a prospective diary study of adolescent sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 2008;17(4):183–192.
  • Schroder KE, Carey MP, Vanable PA. Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(2):104–123. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2602_03. PMID: 14534028.
  • McAuliffe TL, Difranceisco W, Reed BR. Effects of question format and collection mode on the accuracy of retrospective surveys of health risk behavior: a comparison with daily sexual activity diaries. Health Psychol. 2007;26(1):60–67. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.60. PMID: 17209698.
  • Stopka TJ, Springer KW, Khoshnood K, Shaw S, Singer M. Writing about risk: use of daily diaries in understanding drug-user risk behaviors. AIDS Behav. 2004;8(1):73–85. doi:10.1023/B:AIBE.0000017527.25533.f4. PMID: 15146135.
  • Gillmore MR, Leigh BC, Hoppe MJ, Morrison DM. Comparison of daily and retrospective reports of vaginal sex in heterosexual men and women. J Sex Res. 2010;47(4):279–284. doi:10.1080/00224490903050584. PMID: 19544136.
  • Garry M, Sharman SJ, Feldman J, Marlatt GA, Loftus EF. Examining memory for heterosexual college students sexual experiences using an electronic mail diary. Health Psychol. 2002;21(6):629–634. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.21.6.629. PMID: 12433018.
  • Horvath KJ, Beadnell B, Bowen AM. A daily web diary of the sexual experiences of men who have sex with men: comparisons with a retrospective recall survey. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(4):537–548. doi:10.1007/s10461-007-9206-y. PMID: 17318430.
  • Schroder KE, Johnson CJ, Wiebe JS. Interactive voice response technology applied to sexual behavior self-reports: a comparison of three methods. AIDS Behav. 2006;11(2):313–323. doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9145-z.
  • Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2015 National Report. College students. Available at: http://www.pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/2015-Pearson-Student-Mobile-Device-Survey-College.pdf. Published June 2015. Accessed June 1, 2017.
  • Jessup G, Bian S, Chen YW, Bundy AC. Manual of P.I.E.L. Survey application [iPhone/iPod Touch/iPad/iPad mini Application]. Available at: http://pielsurvey.org/. Published 2016. Accessed December 1, 2016.
  • Miller ET, Neal DJ, Roberts LJ, et al. Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods? Psychol Addict Behav. 2002;16(1):323–341. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.16.1.56.
  • Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  • Wiseheart M. Effect size calculator. Available at: http://cognitiveflexibility.org/effectsize/. Published December 2013. Accessed June 1, 2017.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.