Enlisting friends to reduce sexual victimization risk: There's an app for that… but nobody uses it

References

• Abbey A. Alcohol-related sexual assault: a common problem among college students. J Stud Alc. 2002;14:118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blayney J, Read J, Colder C. Role of alcohol in college sexual victimization and postassault adaptation. Psychol Trauma. 2016;8:421–430. doi:10.1037/tra0000100. PMID: 26950014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun K, Mouilso E, Edwards K. Sexual assault among college students. Sex In College: The Things They Don't Write Home About [e-book]. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-CLIO; 2012:263–288.
   Google Scholar
• Testa M, Livingston J. Alcohol consumption and women's vulnerability to sexual victimization: can reducing women's drinking prevent rape? Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44:1349–1376. doi:10.1080/10826080902961468. PMID:19938922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz K, Ullman S. Alcohol and sexual assault victimization: research findings and future directions. Aggress Violent Behav. 2016;31:82–94. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens C, Rich M, Ullman J. Rehearsing for real life: the impact of the InterACT Sexual Assault Prevention Program on self-reported likelihood of engaging in bystander interventions. Violence Against Women. 2011;17:760–776. doi:10.1177/1077801211410212. PMID: 21628338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banyard V, Moynihan M, Plante E. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an experimental evaluation. J Community Psychol. 2007;35:463–481. doi:10.1002/jcop.20159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar L, Vivolo-Kantor A, Hardin J, Berkowitz A. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial. JMIR. 2014;16:3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Banyard V. Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: the case of interpersonal violence. Violence Vict. 2008;23:83–97. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83. PMID: 18396583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banyard V, Moynihan M. Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: correlates in a sample of college students. Psychol Violence. 2011;1:287–301. doi:10.1037/a0023544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Banyard V, Garnhart L. To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29:476–496. doi:10.1177/0886260513505210. PMID: 24097909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn S. A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles. 2009;60:779–792. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine M, Cassidy C, Brazier G, Reicher S. Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: two experimental studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32:1452–1463. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson. Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2015 National Report: College students. www.pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/2015-Pearson-Student-Mobile-Device -Survey-College.pdf. Published June, 2015. Accessed November 30, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lepp A, Barkley J, Karpinski A. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Comput Human Behav. 2014;31:343–350. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp A, Li J, Barkley J. College students' cell phone use and attachment to parents and peers. Comput Human Behav. 2016;64:401–408. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan R, Stone A. Bringing the laboratory and clinic to the community: mobile technologies for health promotion and disease prevention. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:471–498. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143736. PMID: 22994919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. Announcing the winners of the apps against abuse technology challenge. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2011/11/01/announcing-winners-apps-against-abuse-technology-challenge. Published November, 2011. Accessed November 30, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Latané B, Darley J. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Banyard V, Moynihan M, Cares A, Warner R. How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses. Psychol Violence. 2014;4:101–115. doi:10.1037/a0033470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell L, Sobell M. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992:41–72.
   Google Scholar
• Testa M, VanZile-Tamsen C, Livingston J, Koss M. Assessing women's experiences of sexual aggression using the sexual experiences survey: evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychol Women Quarterly. 2004;28:256–265. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00143.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh H, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687. PMID: 16204405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J, Pazienza R, Olin R, Rich H. That's what friends are for: bystander responses to friends or strangers at risk for party rape victimization. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30:2775–2792. doi:10.1177/0886260514554290. PMID: 25349015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turchik J, Probst D, Chau M, Nigoff A, Gidycz C. Factors predicting the type of tactics used to resist sexual assault: a prospective study of college women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;75:605–614. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.605.
   Google Scholar
• Orchowski L, Creech S, Reddy M, Capezza N, Ratcliff T. College women's perceived risk to experience sexual victimization: a prospective analysis. Violence Vict. 2016;27:194–214. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.27.2.194.
   Google Scholar
• Gidycz C, McNamara J, Edwards K. Women's risk perception and sexual victimization: a review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav. 2006;11:441–456. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cue K, George W, Norris J. Women's appraisals of sexual-assault risk in dating situations. Psychol Women Quarterly. 1996;20:487–504. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00318.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris J, Nurius P, Graham T. When a date changes from fun to dangerous: factors affecting women's ability to distinguish. Violence Against Women. 1999;5:230–250. doi:10.1177/10778019922181202. PMID: 26023278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parks K, Miller B, Collins R, Zetes-Zanatta L. Women's descriptions of drinking in bars: reasons and risks. Sex Roles. 1998;38:701–717. doi:10.1023/A:1018864812706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis K, Stoner S, Norris J, George W, Masters N. Women's awareness of and discomfort with sexual assault cues: effects of alcohol consumption and relationship type. Violence Against Women. 2009;15:1106–1125. doi:10.1177/1077801209340759. PMID: 19675365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar