Relationship intentions, race, and gender: Student differences in condom use during hookups involving vaginal sex

References

• Garcia JR, Reiber C, Massey SG, Merriwether AM. Sexual hookup culture: a review. Rev Gen Psychol. 2012;16(2):161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle KA. Hooking up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus. New York: New York University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Heldman C, Wade L. Hook-up culture: setting a new research agenda. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2010;7(4):323–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson RD. Hooking up in young adulthood: a review of factors influencing the sexual behavior of college students. J College Stud Psychother. 2010;24(2):98–115. doi:10.1080/87568220903558596.
   Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh EM, Gute G. Hookups and sexual regret among college women. J Soc Psychol. 2008;148(1):77–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder RL, Carey MP. Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: a short-term prospective study. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(5):1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert TA, Kahn AS, Apple KJ. Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. J Sex Res. 2003;40(2):129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul EL, McManus B, Hayes A. Hookups”: characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. J Sex Res. 2000;37(1):76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2015. Atlanta, GA: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis MA, Granato H, Blayney J, Lostutter T, Kilmer J. Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(5):1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder RL, Carey MP. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. J Sex Marital Ther. 2010;36(4):346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Undergraduate Student Reference Group Data Report Spring 2016. Hanover, MD; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bearak JM. Casual contraception in casual sex: life-cycle change in undergraduates’ sexual behavior in hookups. Soc Forces. 2014;93(2):483–513. doi:10.1093/sf/sou091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing-Matibag TM, Geisinger B. Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: a health belief model perspective. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(9):1196–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin J. Risk taking as developmentally appropriate experimentation for college students. J Adolesc Res.2005;20(2):219–241. doi:10.1177/0743558404273073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood KB, Shook NJ. Who cares what others think? The indirect effect of others’ attitudes on condom use intentions. Int J Sex Heal. 2014;26(4):282–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Ghaidarov TM, Lac A, Kenney SR. Hooking up in the college context: the event-level effects of alcohol use and partner familiarity on hookup behaviors and contentment. J Sex Res. 2014;51(1):62–73. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.714010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia JR, Reiber C. Hook-up behavior: a biopsychosocial perspective. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol. 2008;2(4):192–208.
   Google Scholar
• Owen J, Fincham FD. Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman FE. African American college women: constructing a hierarchy of sexual arrangements. AIDS Care. 2003;15(4):493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman FE. Intimate risk: sexual risk behavior among African American college women. J Black Stud. 2003;33(5):637–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson YO, Quinn SC, Eng E, Sandelowski M. The gender ratio imbalance and its relationship to risk of HIV/AIDS among African American women at historically black colleges and universities. AIDS Care. 2006;18(4):323–331. doi:10.1080/09540120500162122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alleyne B, Gaston G. Gender disparity and HIV risk among young black women in college: a literature review. Affil J Women Soc Work. 2010;25(2):135–145. doi:10.1177/0886109910364348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder TD, Dillow SA. Digest of Education Statistics 2013. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson S, Laumann EO, Paik A, Mahay J. The theory of sexual markets. In: Laumann EO, Ellingson S, Mahay J, Paik A, Youm Y, eds. The Sexual Organization of the City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004:3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly C. Feminist ethics evaluating the hookup culture. J Fem Stud Relig (Indiana Univ Press 2012;28(2):27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoads S. Hookup culture: the high costs of a low “price” for sex. Society. 2012;49(6):515–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uecker JE, Regnerus MD. Bare market: campus sex ratios, romantic relationships, and sexual behavior. Sociol Q. 2010;51(3):408–435. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01177.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw C, Kahn A, Saville B. To hook up or date: which gender benefits? Sex Roles. 2010;62(9–10):661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins T, England P, Risman BJ, Ford J. Student bodies: does the sex ratio matter for hooking up and having sex at college? Soc Curr. 2015;2(2):144–162.
   Google Scholar
• Guttentag M, Secord PF. Too Many Women? The Sex Ratio Question. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Hall NM, Lee AK, Witherspoon DD. Factors influencing dating experiences among African American emerging adults. Emerg Adulthood. 2014;2(3):184–194. doi:10.1177/2167696813520154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkins Hall W, Tanner AE. US Black college women’s sexual health in hookup culture: intersections of race and gender. Cult Heal Sex 2016;18(11):1058. doi:10.1080/13691058.2016.1183046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome VR, Airhihenbuwa CO, Snipes SA. Educated and at-risk: how the shortage of available partners influences disparities in HIV risk for college-educated African-American women. J Heal Disparities Res Pract. 2014;7(Suppl. 2):47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Owen J, Rhoades G, Stanley S, Fincham F. Hooking up among college students: demographic and psychosocial correlates. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(3):653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin SL. Who is epidemiologically fathomable in the HIV/AIDS epidemic? Gender, sexuality, and intersectionality in public health. Cult Health Sex. 2005;7(6):615–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCree DH, Rompalo A. Biological and behavioral risk factors associated with STDs/HIV in women: Implications for behavioral intervention. In: Aral SO, Douglass, Jr., JM, Lipshutz JA, eds. Behavioral Interventions for Prevention and Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. New York, NY: Springer; 2007:310–324.
   Google Scholar
• Moench TR, Chipato T, Padian NS. Preventing disease by protecting the cervix: the unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices. AIDS. 2001;15(13):1595–1602. doi:10.1097/00002030-200109070-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asare M. Using the theory of planned behavior to determine the condom use behavior among college students. Am J Health Stud. 2015;30(1):43–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh JL, Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Changes in women’s condom use over the first year of college. J Sex Res. 2013;50(2):128–138. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.642024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhi ER, Marhefka SL, Hoban MT. The state of the union: sexual health disparities in a national sample of US college students. J Am Coll Heal. 2010;58(4):337–346. doi:10.1080/07448480903501780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis C, Sloan M, MacMaster S, Kilbourne B. HIV/AIDS knowledge and sexual activity: an examination of racial differences in a college sample. Health Soc Work. 2007;32(3):211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas PE, Voetsch AC, Song B. HIV risk behaviors and testing history in historically black college and university settings. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(Suppl 3):115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge M, Wade BH. HIV/AIDS perceptions, attitudes and behaviors among HBCU students. Challenge. 2007;13(2):13–36.
   Google Scholar
• El Bcheraoui C, Sutton MY, Hardnett FP, Jones SB. Patterns of condom use among students at historically Black colleges and universities: implications for HIV prevention efforts among college-age young adults. AIDS Care. 2013;25(2):186–193. doi:10.1080/09540121.2012.687864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong EA, England P, Fogarty ACK. Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. Am Sociol Rev. 2012;77(3):435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece M, Herbenick D, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States. J Sex Med. 2010;7:266–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell L, O'Donnell CR, Stueve A. Early sexual initiation and subsequent sex-related risks among urban minority youth: the reach for health study. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33(6):268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burdette AM, Ellison CG, Hill TD, Glenn ND. Hooking up at college: does religion make a difference? J Sci Study Relig. 2009;48(3):535–551. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01464.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimeyer TM, Smith WL. Religion, race, social class, and gender differences in dating and hooking up among college students. Sociol Spectr. 2012;32(5):462–473. doi:10.1080/02732173.2012.694799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Carey KB, Carey MP. Health behavior and college students: does Greek affiliation matter? J Behav Med. 2008;31(1):61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reel JJ, Joy E, Hellstrom EM. Reducing high-risk sexual behaviors among college athletes. J Sport Psychol Action. 2012;3(1):21–29. doi:10.1080/21520704.2011.649193.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby BJ, Carroll JS. The impact of living in co-ed resident halls on risk-taking among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2009;58(3):241–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik A. Hookups, dating, and relationship quality: does the type of sexual involvement matter? Soc Sci Res. 2010;39(5):739–753. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou S-I. HIV-related behaviors among black students attending Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) versus white students attending a traditionally white institution (TWI). AIDS Care. 2009;21(8):1050–1057. doi:10.1080/09540120802626196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning WD, Longmore MA, Giordano PC. The relationship context of contraceptive use at first intercourse. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000;32(3):104–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowleg L. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1267–1273. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum. 1989;1989:139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Younge SN, Corneille MA, Lyde M, Cannady J. The paradox of risk: historically black college/university students and sexual health. J Am Coll Heal. 2013;61(5):254–262. doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.799480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar