College students’ reasons for using different e-cigarette products: A mixed methods analysis

References

• Arrazola RA, Kuiper NM, Dube SR. Patterns of current use of tobacco products among U.S. high school students for 2000-2012–findings from the National Youth Tobacco Survey. J Adoles Health. 2014;54(1):54–60. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi K, Forster JL. Beliefs and experimentation with electronic cigarettes: a prospective analysis among young adults. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):175–178. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King BA, Patel RP, Nguyen KH, Dube SR. Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010–2013. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2015;17(2):219–227. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson JL, Richardson A, Niaura RS, Vallone DM, Abrams DB. e-Cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(9):1758–1766. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams DB, Glasser AM, Pearson JL, Villanti AC, Collins LK, Niaura RS. Harm minimization and tobacco control: reframing societal views of nicotine use to rapidly save lives. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):193–213. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013849.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glantz SA, Bareham DW. E-cigarettes: use, effects on smoking, risks, and policy implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):215–235. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013757.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green LW, Fielding JE, Brownson RC. The debate about electronic cigarettes: harm minimization or the precautionary principle. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:189–191. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-102417-124810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajek P, Phillips-Waller A, Przulj D, et al. A randomized trial of e-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):629–637. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1808779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Borland R, Lindblom EN, et al. Potential deaths averted in USA by replacing cigarettes with e-cigarettes. Tob Control. 2018;27(1):18–25. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2014;23(2):133–139. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington-Trimis JL, Berhane K, Unger JB, et al. The e-cigarette social environment, e-cigarette use, and susceptibility to cigarette smoking. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(1):75–80. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington-Trimis JL, Urman R, Berhane K, et al. E-cigarettes and future cigarette use. Pediatrics 2016;138(1):e20160379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East K, Hitchman SC, Bakolis I, et al. The association between smoking and electronic cigarette use in a cohort of young people. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(5):539–547. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal AM, Strong DR, Kirkpatrick MG, et al. Association of electronic cigarette use with initiation of combustible tobacco product smoking in early adolescence. JAMA 2015;314(7):700–707. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primack BA, Soneji S, Stoolmiller M, Fine MJ, Sargent JD. Progression to traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(11):1018–1023. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger JB, Soto DW, Leventhal A. E-cigarette use and subsequent cigarette and marijuana use among Hispanic young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;163:261–264. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills TA, Knight R, Sargent JD, Gibbons FX, Pagano I, Williams RJ. Longitudinal study of e-cigarette use and onset of cigarette smoking among high school students in Hawaii. Tob Control. 2017;26(1):34–39. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan ASL, Lee C, Bigman CA. Comparison of beliefs about e-cigarettes’ harms and benefits among never users and ever users of e-cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;158:67–75. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson L, Hoek J, Blank M-L, Richards R, Ling P, Popova L. Dual use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smoked tobacco: a qualitative analysis. Tob Control. 2018;28:13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzahrani T, Pena I, Temesgen N, Glantz SA. Association between electronic cigarette use and myocardial infarction. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(4):455–461. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camenga DR, Tindle HA. Weighing the risks and benefits of electronic cigarette use in high-risk populations. Med Clin N Am. 2018;102(4):765–779. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2018.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen KF, Willig J, Cayo Talavera S, et al. E-cigarettes and cigarettes worsen peripheral and central hemodynamics as well as arterial stiffness: a randomized, double-blinded pilot study. Vasc Med. 2018;23(5):419–425. doi:10.1177/1358863X18779694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavizadeh P, Liu J, Havel CM, et al. Vascular endothelial function is impaired by aerosol from a single IQOS HeatStick to the same extent as by cigarette smoke. Tob Control. 2018;27(Suppl 1):s13–s19. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee H-W, Park S-H, Weng M-w, et al. E-cigarette smoke damages DNA and reduces repair activity in mouse lung, heart, and bladder as well as in human lung and bladder cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(7):E1560–E1569. doi:10.1073/pnas.1718185115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp PW, Jaspers I. Electronic cigarettes: their constituents and potential links to asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2017;17(11):79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower M, Nandakumar L, Singh M, Wyld D, Windsor M, Fielding D. Respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease secondary to electronic nicotine delivery system use confirmed with open lung biopsy. Respirol Case Rep. 2017;5(3):e00230. doi:10.1002/rcr2.230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen JG, Flanigan SS, LeBlanc M, et al. Flavoring chemicals in e-cigarettes: diacetyl, 2,3-pentanedione, and acetoin in a sample of 51 products, including fruit-, candy-, and cocktail-flavored e-cigarettes. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(6):733–739. doi:10.1289/ehp.1510185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grana RA, Benowitz N, Glantz SE. E-cigarettes: a scientific review. Circulation 2014;129(19):1972–1986. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.007667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S-H, Sun JY, Bonnevie E, et al. Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation. Tob Control. 2014;23(suppl 3):iii3–iii9. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchman SC, Brose LS, Brown J, Robson D, McNeill A. Associations between e-cigarette type, frequency of use, and quitting smoking: findings from a longitudinal online panel survey in Great Britain. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1187–1194. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner WV, Meier E, Wiener JL, et al. The comparative efficacy of first- versus second-generation electronic cigarettes in reducing symptoms of nicotine withdrawal. Addiction. 2015;110(5):862–867. doi:10.1111/add.12870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsalinos KE, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Voudris V. Characteristics, perceived side effects and benefits of electronic cigarette use: a worldwide survey of more than 19,000 consumers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(4):4356–4373. doi:10.3390/ijerph110404356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokhrel P, Herzog TA, Muranka N, Fagan P. Young adult e-cigarette users’ reasons for liking and not liking e-cigarettes: a qualitative study. Psychol Health. 2015;30(12):1450–1469. doi:10.1080/08870446.2015.1061129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson A, Pearson J, Xiao H, Stalgaitis C, Vallone D. Prevalence, harm perceptions, and reasons for using noncombustible tobacco products among current and former smokers. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(8):1437–1444. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkhoran S, Alvarado N, Vijayaraghavan M, Lum PJ, Yuan P, Satterfield JM. Patterns of and reasons for electronic cigarette use in primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(10):1122–1129. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4123-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel D, Davis KC, Cox S, et al. Reasons for current E-cigarette use among U.S. adults. Prev Med. 2016;93:14–20. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen R, Tanski S, Wilson K, Klein JD, Winickoff JP. Adolescent use of different e-cigarette products. Pediatrics. 2018;142:e20180260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Farsalinos KE, Spyrou A, Stefopoulos C, et al. Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between experienced consumers (vapers) and naive users (smokers). Sci Rep. 2015;5(11269).doi:10.1038/srep11269.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Middlestadt SE, Bhattacharyya K, Rosenbaum J, Fishbein M, Shepperd M. The use of theory based semistructed elicitation questionnaires: formative research for CDC's prevention marketing initative. Public Health Rep. 1996;111(1):18–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geshnizjani A, Jozkowski KN, Middlestadt SE. Factors influencing the intention of getting the HPV vaccine among college women: an application of the reasoned action approach. Calif J Health Promot. 2013;11(2):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jozkowski KN, Crawford BL, Hunt ME. Complexity in attitudes toward abortion access: results from two studies. Sex Res Soc Policy 2018;15:464–482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light RJ. Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol Bull. 1971;76(5):365–377. doi:10.1037/h0031643.
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1988;75(4):800–802. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allem J-P, Forster M, Neiberger A, Unger JB. Characteristics of emerging adulthood and e-cigarette use: findings from a pilot study. Addict Behav. 2015;50:40–44. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddleson ML, Kozlowski LT, Giovino GA, et al. Enjoyment and other reasons for electronic cigarette use: results from college students in New York. Addict Behav. 2016;54:33–39. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RJ, Jr., Meshack A, Lin MT, Hill M, Abughosh S. The social norms and beliefs of teenage male electronic cigarette use. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2013;12(4):300–307. doi:10.1080/15332640.2013.819310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawkins L, Kimber C, Puwanesarasa Y, Soar K. First- versus second-generation electronic cigarettes: predictors of choice and effects on urge to smoke and withdrawal symptoms. Addiction. 2015;110(4):669–677. doi:10.1111/add.12807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo CW, Harper R. Perceived characteristics of e-cigarettes as an innovation by young adults. Health Behav Policy Rev. 2015;2(2):154–162. doi:10.14485/HBPR.2.2.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malas M, van der Tempel J, Schwartz R, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(10):1926–1936. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkhoran S, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(2):116–128. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00521-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo CW, Harper R. Use and perception of electronic cigarettes among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2013;61(3):149–155. doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.776052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo CW, Kim S-J. The effect of electronic cigarette advertising on intended use among. Addict Behav. 2015;46:77–81. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychologoy Press (Taylor & Francis); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs PD, Hammig B, Henry LJ. E-cigarette use among US adolescents: perceptions of relative addiction and harm. Health Educ J. 2016;293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins L, Turner J, Roberts A, Soar K. 'Vaping' profiles and preferences: an online survey of electronic cigarette users. Addiction. 2013;108(6):1115–1125. doi:10.1111/add.12150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Duan Z, Kwok J, et al. Vaping versus JUULing: how the extraordinary growth and marketing of JUUL transformed the US retail e-cigarette market. Tob Control 2019;28:146–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers JW, Leas EC, Allem J-P, et al. Why do people use electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes)? A content analysis of Twitter, 2012-2015. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0170702. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar