References
- Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.
- Krebs C, Lindquist CH, Berzofsky M, et al. Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2016: 1–193. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ccsvsftr.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2017.
- Gluckman N, Read B, Katherine M, Quilantan B. Sexual harassment and assault in higher ed: what’s happened since weinstein. Chron High Educ. November 2017. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Sexual-HarassmentAssault/241757. Accessed October 19, 2019.
- White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. Not Alone: The First Report of the White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault; 2014. http://www.xcdsystem.com/ABA/abstract/presentations/PresentationFile_99.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2015.
- Jouriles EN, Krauss A, Vu NL, Banyard VL, McDonald R. Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(6):457–466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906.
- Banyard VL. Who will help prevent sexual violence: creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychol Violence. 2011;1(3):216–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023739.
- Brinkman BG, Manning L. Children’s intended responses to gender-based bullying as targets and bystanders. Childhood 2016;23(2):221–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568215595095.
- Kochenderfer-Ladd B, Pelletier ME. Teachers’ views and beliefs about bullying: influences on classroom management strategies and students’ coping with peer victimization. J Sch Psychol. 2008;46(4):431–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005.
- Hektner JM, Swenson CA. Links from teacher beliefs to peer victimization and bystander intervention: tests of mediating processes. J Early Adolesc. 2012;32(4):516–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431611402502.
- Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol. 1977;32(7):513–531. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513.
- Banyard VL. Toward the Next Generation of Bystander Prevention of Sexual and Relationship Violence: Action Coils to Engage Communities. London: Springer; 2015.
- Crowl JN. The effect of community policing on fear and crime reduction, police legitimacy and job satisfaction: an empirical review of the evidence. Police Pract Res. 2017;18(5):449–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2017.1303771.
- McMahon S. Call for research on bystander intervention to prevent sexual violence: the role of campus environments. Am J Community Psychol. 2015;55(3-4):472–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9724-0.
- Banyard VL, Rizzo AJ, Bencosme Y, Cares AC, Moynihan MM. How community and peer perceptions promote college students’ pro-social bystander actions to prevent sexual violence. J Interpers Violence. 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518777557.
- Brown AL, Messman-Moore TL. Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students’ willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(3):503–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334400.
- Kahan DM. Social meaning and the economic analysis of crime. J Leg Stud. 1998;27(S2):609–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/468037.
- Sulkowski ML. An investigation of students’ willingness to report threats of violence in campus communities. Psychol Violence. 2011;1(1):53–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021592.
- James VJ, Lee DR. Through the looking glass: exploring how college students’ perceptions of the police influence sexual assault victimization reporting. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30(14):2447–2469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553116.
- Moore BM, Baker T. An exploratory examination of college students’ likelihood of reporting sexual assault to police and university officials: results of a self-report survey. J Interpers Violence. 2018;33(22):3419–3438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516632357.
- Schwarz J, Gibson S, Lewis-Arévalo C. Sexual assault on college campuses: substance use, victim status awareness, and barriers to reporting. Build Healthy Acad Community J. 2017;1(2):45–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.18061/bhac.v1i2.5520.
- Stoner JE, Cramer RJ. Sexual violence victimization among college females: a systematic review of rates, barriers, and facilitators of health service utilization on campus. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017;20(4):520–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017721245.
- Ameral V, Palm Reed KM, Hines DA. An analysis of help-seeking patterns among college student victims of sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking. J Interpers Violence. 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517721169.
- Cantor D, Fisher BS, Chibnall S, et al. Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia; 2015:302.
- Holland KJ, Cortina LM. “It happens to girls all the time”: examining sexual assault survivors’ reasons for not using campus supports. Am J Community Psychol. 2017;59(1-2):50–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12126.
- Sabina C, Ho LY. Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15(3):201–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521322.
- Jouriles EN, Sargent KS, Salis KL, et al. TakeCARE, a video to promote bystander behavior on college campuses: replication and extension. J Interpers Violence. 2017:1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517718189.
- McConnell E. Bystander Intervention to Prevent Campus Sexual Violence: The Role of Sense of Community, Peer Norms, and Administrative Responding (Master's thesis). Portland State University; 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6439.
- Storer HL, Casey EA, Herrenkohl TI. Developing “whole school” bystander interventions: the role of school-settings in influencing adolescents responses to dating violence and bullying. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;74:87–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.01.018.
- Rowe M, Wilcox L, Gadlin H. Dealing with - or reporting - “unacceptable” behavior. J Int Ombudsman Assoc. 2009;2(1):52–64.
- Holland KJ, Rabelo VC, Cortina L. See something, do something: predicting sexual assault bystander intentions in the U.S. military. Am J Community Psychol. 2016;58(1-2):3–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12077.
- Tyler TR, Fagan J. Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State J Crim Law. 2008;6(1):231–276.
- Aiello MF, Lawton BA. Campus police cooperation and legitimacy: extending the procedural justice model. Deviant Behav. 2018;39(10):1371–1385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1410618.
- Cloutier J, Vilhuber L, Harrisson D, Béland-Ouellette V. Understanding the effect of procedural justice on psychological distress. Int J Stress Manag. 2018;25(3):283–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000065.
- Tyler TR. The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group-value model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(5):830–838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830.
- Benavides-Espinoza C, Cunningham GB. Bystanders’ reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles. 2010;63(3-4):201–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9781-7.
- Christian JS, Christian MS, Garza AS, Ellis A. Examining retaliatory responses to justice violations and recovery attempts in teams. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(6):1218–1232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029450.
- Moorman RH. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J Appl Psychol. 1991;76(6):845–855. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845.
- Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara P, Suárez-Acosta MA. Employees’ reactions to peers’ unfair treatment by supervisors: the role of ethical leadership. J Bus Ethics. 2014;122(4):537–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1778-z.
- Reisig MD, Lloyd C. Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Q. 2009;12(1):42–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611108327311.
- Labhardt D, Holdsworth E, Brown S, Howat D. You see but you do not observe: a review of bystander intervention and sexual assault on university campuses. Aggress Violent Behav. 2017;35:13–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.005.
- Oehme K, Stern N, Mennicke A. A deficiency in addressing campus sexual assault: the lack of women law enforcement officers. Harv J Law Gend 2015;38:337–372.
- Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Cares AC, Warner R. How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses. Psychol Violence. 2014;4(1):101–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033470.
- Folger R, Konovsky MA. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Acad Manage J. 1989;32(1):115–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/256422.
- Yeager DS, Purdie‐Vaughns V, Hooper SY, Cohen GL. Loss of institutional trust among racial and ethnic minority adolescents: a consequence of procedural injustice and a cause of life-span outcomes. Child Dev. 2017;88(2):658–676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12697.