What’s said in a subject line? Framing the email subject lines in health messages sent to university students

References

• Locke B. 2018. Center for collegiate mental health. University Park, PA. Available at: https://ccmh.psu.edu/files/2018/02/2017_CCMH_Report-1r4m88x.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lust K. 2018. Health and health-related behaviors 2018 college student health survey report. Minneapolis, MN. Available at: https://boynton.umn.edu/sites/boynton.umn.edu/files/2018-11/CSHS-2018-UMN-Twin-Cities.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Conley CS, Durlak JA, Dickson DA. An evaluative review of outcome research on universal mental health promotion and prevention programs for higher education students. J Am Coll Heal. 2013;61(5):286–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2013.802237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvořáková K, Kishida M, Li J, et al. Promoting healthy transition to college through mindfulness training with first-year college students: pilot randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Heal. 2017;65(4):259–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2017.1278605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley CS, Shapiro JB, Kirsch AC, Durlak JA. A meta-analysis of indicated mental health prevention programs for at-risk higher education students. J Couns Psychol. 2017;64(2):121–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusufov M, Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, Grey NE, Moyer A, Lobel M. Meta-analytic evaluation of stress reduction interventions for undergraduate and graduate students. Int J Stress Manag. 2019;26(2):132–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull. 1997;121(1):3–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Source Econom. 1979;47(2):263–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(3):500–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothamn A, Updegraff J. Specifying when and how gain-and loss-framed messages motivate healthy behavior: an integrated approach. In: Perspectives on Framing. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis; 2011:257–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854167.
   Google Scholar
• Mann T, Sherman D, Updegraff J. Dispositional motivations and message framing: a test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychol. 2004;23(3):330–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA, Rothman AJ, Sims L. Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Heal Psychol. 2011;30(2):145–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Updegraff JA, Brick C, Emanuel AS, Mintzer RE, Sherman DK. Message framing for health: moderation by perceived susceptibility and motivational orientation in a diverse sample of Americans. Heal Psychol. 2015;34(1):20–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10(1):113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsbury JH, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. The effects of social and health consequence framing on heavy drinking intentions among college students. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20(1):212–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein MH, Wood MD, Erickson LR. The effectiveness of message framing and temporal context on college student alcohol use and problems: a selective e-mail intervention. Alcohol Alcohol. 2016;51(1):106–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendl CM, Higgins ET, Lemm KM. Sensitivity to varying gains and losses: the role of self- discrepancies and event framing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(6):1028–1051. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra A, Rothman A, Pietersma S. The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory. Psychol Health. 2011;26(8):1036–1048. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2010.526715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury RS, Jenkins HM. Feature-positive effect in discrimination learning. Proc Annu Conv Am Psychol Assoc. 1967;2:17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sawmynaden P, Atherton H, Car J, Meyer B. Email for the provision of information on disease prevention and health promotion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(11):CD007982. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007982.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Atherton H, Huckvale C, Car J. Communicating health promotion and disease prevention information to patients via email: a review. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(4):172–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2010.004002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Meyer B, Car J. Email for the coordination of healthcare appointments and attendance reminders. In: Atherton H, ed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007981.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Email Statistics Report, 2015-2019. Palo Alto, CA; 2015. Available at: http://www.radicati.comhttp//www.radicati.com. Accessed October 14, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Miller R, Charles EYA. A psychological based analysis of marketing email subject lines. In: 2016 Sixteenth International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer). IEEE; 2016:58–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTER.2016.7829899.
   Google Scholar
• Sappleton N, Lourenço F. Email subject lines and response rates to invitations to participate in a web survey and a face-to-face interview: the sound of silence. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016;19(5):611–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1078596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter SR, Whitcomb ME. E-mail subject lines and their effect on web survey viewing and response. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2005;23(3):380–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305275912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou EY, Murnighan JK. Life or death decisions: framing the call for help. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Updegraff JA, Emanuel AS, Gallagher KM, Steinman CT. Framing flu prevention—An experimental field test of signs promoting hand hygiene during the 2009–2010 H1N1 pandemic. Heal Psychol. 2011;30(3):295–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracen A, Naughton A, Reilly JO, Panoutsakopoulou V, Rooney N. Peer support training manual. Trinity Coll Dublin Student Couns Serv. Dublin, Ireland: Student Counseling Service, Trinity College Dublin; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM. Goal achievement: the role of intentions. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 1993;4(1):141–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000059.
   Google Scholar
• McCaul KD, Johnson RJ, Rothman AJ. The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Heal Psychol. 2002;21(6):624–628. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.21.6.624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe D. Your chi-square test is statistically significant: now what? - Practical assessment. Research & Evaluation. 2015;20(8). doi:https://doi.org/10.7275/tbfa-x148
   Google Scholar
• Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H, Hester J, Francois R. Readr: read rectangular text data. 2017. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package-readr.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H, Francois R, Henry L, Muller K. Dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. 2018. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=dplyr.
   Google Scholar
• Warnes GR, Bolker B, Lumley T, Johnson RC. Gmodels: various r programming tools for model fitting. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski M. Email marketing benchmarks. GetResponse; Available at: https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks#average-results-by-message-type. Published 2019. Accessed January 4, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Salo J. Effects of link placements in email newsletters on their click-through rate. J Mark Commun. 2018;24(5):535–548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1147485.
   Google Scholar
• Lim KH, Lim E-P, Jiang B, Achananuparp P. Using Online Controlled Experiments to Examine Authority Effects on User Behavior in Email Campaigns. In: 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2016. 255–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2914586.2914619.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels RD, Kelly KM, Rothman AJ. Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: the effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychol Health. 2010;25(7):821–838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440902893708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell S, Perugini M, Rakow T. Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: consideration of future consequences. Heal Psychol. 2004;23(4):388–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar